314 research outputs found
Methods of electron beam bunching
A review of electron beam bunching methods and new bunching methods are
presented. Linear accelerator, storage ring and buncher technologies offer
high-beam quality and short bunches necessary for operation of high efficiency,
high-power, high-degree monochromatic prebunched FELs in optical and X-ray
regions.Comment: 4 pages, LaTe
Π£ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π²Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΉ Π½Π° ΡΡΠ·Π²ΠΈΠΌΡΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ Π² ΡΠΈΠΊΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΏΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°
Existing preventive measures have not been entirely efficient. Mainly they are aimed at solving social and economic issues, which demands both time and money. Considering this, it is necessary to find and sustain additional effective measures, based on patterns of development of infectious diseases, which could be more cost-effective. One of such approaches could be based on the theory of self-regulation of parasitic systems, which directs epidemiologists to conducting preventive measures before the rise of the number of cases to prevent increase in the agents virulence. Yet this theory does not provide the optimum time for preventive measures. Based on the main statements of the theory of self-regulation of parasitic systems and analysis of annual and/or long-term cyclicity, the article provides substantiation of the theory that the lowest level of incidence is the weakest period in its development. Epidemiological experiments, using bacterial dysentery as an example, showed that preventive administration of polyvalent dysenteric bacteriophage in risk groups (children going to preschool institutions) during two months of the lowest incidence level of the disease appeared to be effective. The positive effect took place in the stages of cyclic increase and decrease of long-term trends. The effect appeared in the groups of children and population in general with most marked decline in disease occurrence in its seasonal peak. The hypothesis that the lowest incidence level is directly related to seasonal climbs of the disease was proved by our earlier studies when we investigated influence of technogenic pollution of the environment on annual incidence rate of more than ten most common infectious diseases with different ways of transmission. Thus, the lowest incidence level of infectious diseases defines their future growth and/or decline, and, therefore, it can be used to conduct preventive measures.Π‘ΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ Π² Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΅ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠΏΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π» ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅Π³ΠΎ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Ρ, ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΌ Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ², ΡΡΠΎ ΡΡΠ΅Π±ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΊΡΡΠΏΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π»ΠΎΠ²Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ. Π‘ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠΈΡΠΊ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΉ, ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π½Π° Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ
ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΡΠΏΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡ Π±ΡΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ. ΠΠ΄ΠΈΠ½ ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ Π±ΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ Π½Π° ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ°Ρ ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠΏΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ² Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΉ Π΄ΠΎ Π½Π°ΡΠ°Π»Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ° Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ Ρ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΏΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²Π°ΡΠΈΠ°Π½ΡΠ° Π²ΠΎΠ·Π±ΡΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Ρ. ΠΠ΄Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎ Π² ΡΡΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ Π½Π΅ ΡΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠ΅Π²Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅Ρ. Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΡΠΏΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ° ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ, ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠΌ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΡΠ·Π²ΠΈΠΌΡΠΌ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ Π² Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΈ. Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΡΠΏΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ Π΄ΠΈΠ·Π΅Π½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΈ, ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»ΠΈ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π°Π»Π΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄ΠΈΠ·Π΅Π½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΉΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π±Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΡΠ°Π³Π° Π² Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ°Ρ
ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ° (ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π΄Π΅ΡΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ°) Π² ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π΄Π²ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ. Π£ΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΉ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π» ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΎ Π½Π° ΡΠ°Π·Π°Ρ
ΡΠΈΠΊΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ° ΠΈ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΡΠ½Π΅ΠΉ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ²ΠΈΠ»ΡΡ Π² Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ°Ρ
Π΄Π΅ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΊΡΠΏΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π² Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄. ΠΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠΌ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ Π½Π°Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΡ Π² ΠΏΡΡΠΌΠΎΠΉ Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ Ρ Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π°Π³ΡΡΠ·Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠΊΡΡΠΆΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Ρ Π½Π° Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΠ³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π΄Π΅ΡΡΡΠΈ Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΎΡΠΌ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄Π°ΡΠΈ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠΌ, ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ (ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ) ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ΅Ρ Π΅Π΅ Π±ΡΠ΄ΡΡΠΈΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΈ/ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ Π±ΡΡΡ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΉ
EPIDEMIC PROCESS IN MODERN CONDITIONS
Nowadays the evolution of epidemic process is under active influence of a new adjusting risk factor - technogenic environmental contamination. Negative influence of ecological pressure on manifestations of infectious diseases is realized in destabilization of epidemic process: significantly higher level of incidence, greater amplitude of its fluctuations around a trendline and. shortening cyclic componenta. Besides this, the more heavy clinical manifestations of infectious process and its longer duration with simultaneous development of the complications, accompanying diseases and. synchronization of process takes place. Decrease of immunological and epidemiological effectiveness of vaccination is also registered. This paper establishes, that the minimal period of infection incidence is the most vulnerable part in a uniform circuit of epidemic process. It is shown in epidemiological experiment that the complex of preventive actions at management of infection incidence is necessary for making active during a minimum level of development of epidemic process in its intraannual dynamics
Clinical manifestation of radiation-exposed tuberculosis when uranium production
Present study was performed in Krasnokamensk city. We conducted retrospective study of 34 incident cases of tuberculosis (TB) among employees of the Priargunsky Industrial Mining and Chemical Union exposed to radiation (uranium production and processing). The comparison group included 47 TB patients, permanent residents of Krasnokamensk. The study found out that long-term dynamics of TB morbidity in the main group exceeded the one of the comparison group. Among the employees, most cases were registered in the 20-35 age group (47.0 %), and among the Krasnokamensk residents - in the 35-50 age group (51.0 %). In the main group, the most common cases were gross and extrapulmonary forms of tuberculosis (53.0 % and 14.7 % respectively). In the comparison group, minor TB forms dominated (59.5 %) and only one case of extrapulmonary tuberculosis was registered (p < 0.05). The effectiveness of the treatment in compared groups did not differ
ΠΠ»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ±Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ³Π΅Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° ΡΠ°Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ·ΡΡΠΈΠΌΡΠ»ΠΈΡΡΡΡΡΡ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ
Objective: to study the ability of hyperbaric oxygenation (HBO) to eliminate impaired phagocytosis-stimulating hepatic function caused by hepatectomy (HE). Material and methods. Experiments were conducted on 82 outbred female albino rats exposed to HE (15β20% of the organ mass) and HBO at 3 ata for 50 min once daily three times within the first three days after surgery. The capacities of neutrophils and monocytes of arterial (aorta) and venous (portal vein, hepatic veins) blood to ingest and digest S.aureus were investigated. Results: Under HBO, the inhibitory impact of HE on the phagocytosis-stimulating ability of the liver to S.aureus was limited for neutrophils and completely precluded for monocytes. In the posthyperoxic period, the phagocytosis-stimulating function of the operated liver was found to be active against the microbe being examined for both types of phagocytes. This was attended by inhibition of the anhepatic mechanisms responsible for the amplified phagocytic activity of neutrophils and monocytes, which were triggered in HE. HBO selectively regulated the arterial and venous blood content of neutrophils, by ingesting and digesting S.aureus as much as possible. HBO prevented the post-HE delay of the neutrophils and monocytes which actively englobed S.aureus in the operated organ. Conclusion: HBO eliminates HE-induced impairment of phagocytosis-stimulating function of the liver and creates conditions for its delayed activation by day 11 posthy-peroxia. Key words: hyperoxia, phagocytosis, regulation, liver, resection.Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ β ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠΈΡΡ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ±Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ³Π΅Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ (ΠΠΠ) ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΡ Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ·ΡΡΠΈΠΌΡ-Π»ΠΈΡΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ, Π²ΡΠ·Π²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π·Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ (Π Π). ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π» ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ. ΠΠΏΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ Π½Π° 82 Π±Π΅ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡ
Π±Π΅Π»ΡΡ
ΠΊΡΡΡΠ°Ρ
(ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ
), ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π²Π΅ΡΠ³Π½ΡΡΡΡ
Π Π (15β20% ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½Π°) ΠΈ ΠΠΠ Π² ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌΠ΅ 3 Π°ΡΠ°, 50 ΠΌΠΈΠ½, 1 ΡΠ΅Π°Π½Ρ Π² ΡΡΡΠΊΠΈ, ΡΡΡΡ
ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎ, Π² ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠΎΠ΅ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π½Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ² Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ (Π°ΠΎΡΡΠ°) ΠΈ Π²Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΎΠΉ (ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π²Π΅Π½Π°, ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π²Π΅Π½Ρ) ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ³Π»ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΡ S.aureus. Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ. Π ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΠΠ ΠΈΠ½Π³ΠΈ-Π±ΠΈΡΡΡΡΠ΅Π΅ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ Π Π Π½Π° ΡΠ°Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ·ΡΡΠΈΠΌΡΠ»ΠΈΡΡΡΡΡΡ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΊ S.aureus Π΄Π»Ρ Π½Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ² ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ, Π° Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ. Π ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π΅ ΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½Π° Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ·ΡΡΠΈΠΌΡΠ»ΠΈΡΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² ΡΠ°Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ² ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈ Π² ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠ±Π°. ΠΡΠΎ ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ½Π³ΠΈΠ±ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π²Π½Π΅ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠ² Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ°Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ², Π·Π°ΠΏΡΡΠΊΠ°Π΅ΠΌΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈ Π Π. ΠΠΠ ΠΈΠ·Π±ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ Π²Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ², ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ³Π»ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡ
S.aureus. ΠΠΠ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π΅Ρ, ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ Π Π, Π·Π°Π΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΊΡ Π² ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½Π΅ Π½Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ², Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΠ°Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΡΡΡΠΈΡ
S.aureus. ΠΠ°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠΠΠ ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠ΅Ρ, Π²ΡΠ·ΡΠ²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ΅ Π Π, Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ·-ΡΡΠΈΠΌΡΠ»ΠΈΡΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°ΡΡ ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ Π΄Π»Ρ Π΅Ρ ΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΊ 11-ΠΌ ΡΡΡΠΊΠ°ΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π°. ΠΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π°: Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΡ, ΡΠ°Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ·, ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡ, ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½Ρ, ΡΠ΅Π·Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡ
NEW METHOD OFΒ EPIDEMIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OFΒ THEΒ INCIDENCE OFΒ COMPLICATIONS AFTER ANTI-TUBERCULOSIS VACCINATION
TheΒ article offers aΒ new method forΒ calculation ofΒ incidence ofΒ complications after primary anti-tuberculosis vaccination. Using theΒ example ofΒ analysis ofΒ continuous sampling ofΒ complications after anti-tuberculosis vaccination (n =Β 110) inΒ Irkutsk Region inΒ 2005-2014 theΒ article shows theΒ advantage ofΒ theΒ offered method compared toΒ theΒ existing ones
- β¦