12 research outputs found

    Association of the more favourable counsellor-assessed outcomes with larger improvements in the client rating scales.

    No full text
    <p>Box-plot shows the distribution of change in rating scales (complaint, functioning) for each status (increased, same, improved, resolved) at client’s last visit as assessed by the counsellor (n = 6,988).</p

    Efficacy in monitoring change of two client rating scales used to assess counselling outcome.

    No full text
    <p>Histogram shows difference in the changes in the complaint and functioning rating scales. Rating scale difference is defined as (complaint rating at client’s last visit–complaint rating at the first visit)–(functioning rating at the client’s last visit–functioning rating at the first visit).</p

    Flow diagram of participants of the supplementation study in Goronyo.

    No full text
    <p>MNP, micronutrient powder; RUTF, ready-to-use therapeutic food; SAM, severe acute malnutrition; TFC, therapeutic feeding centre.</p

    Mean weight gain (g).

    No full text
    a<p>mean (95% CI) SD.</p>b<p>RUTF n = 88, control n = 86.</p>c<p>RUTF n = 87, control n = 84.</p

    Baseline characteristics.

    No full text
    <p>RUTF: ready-to-use therapeutic food. MUAC: middle-upper arm circumference.</p>a<p>Number (%).</p>b<p>mean ± SD: standard deviation.</p>c<p>mean (median, IQR: interquartile range).</p>d<p>91 patients analysed in the intervention group and 83 in the control group.</p><p>symptom in the 14 days prior to study inclusion.</p>f<p>axillary temperature &gt;38°C.</p>g<p>3 or more liquid stools in any 24 hour period.</p>h<p>occasional persistent vomiting.</p

    Number gaining any weight (&gt;0 g).

    No full text
    a<p>n (%).</p>b<p>OR (95% CI).</p>c<p>RUTF n = 88, control n = 86.</p>d<p>RUTF n = 87, control n = 84.</p
    corecore