Convergent evolution of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants leading to the emergence of BQ.1.1 variant

In late 2022, various Omicron subvariants emerged and cocirculated worldwide. These variants convergently acquired amino acid substitutions at critical residues in the spike protein, including residues R346, K444, L452, N460, and F486. Here, we characterize the convergent evolution of Omicron subvariants and the properties of one recent lineage of concern, BQ.1.1. Our phylogenetic analysis suggests that these five substitutions are recurrently acquired, particularly in younger Omicron lineages. Epidemic dynamics modelling suggests that the five substitutions increase viral fitness, and a large proportion of the fitness variation within Omicron lineages can be explained by these substitutions. Compared to BA.5, BQ.1.1 evades breakthrough BA.2 and BA.5 infection sera more efficiently, as demonstrated by neutralization assays. The pathogenicity of BQ.1.1 in hamsters is lower than that of BA.5. Our multiscale investigations illuminate the evolutionary rules governing the convergent evolution for known Omicron lineages as of 2022

Virological characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 XBB variant derived from recombination of two Omicron subvariants

In late 2022, SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants have become highly diversified, and XBB is spreading rapidly around the world. Our phylogenetic analyses suggested that XBB emerged through the recombination of two cocirculating BA.2 lineages, BJ.1 and BM.1.1.1 (a progeny of BA.2.75), during the summer of 2022. XBB.1 is the variant most profoundly resistant to BA.2/5 breakthrough infection sera to date and is more fusogenic than BA.2.75. The recombination breakpoint is located in the receptor-binding domain of spike, and each region of the recombinant spike confers immune evasion and increases fusogenicity. We further provide the structural basis for the interaction between XBB.1 spike and human ACE2. Finally, the intrinsic pathogenicity of XBB.1 in male hamsters is comparable to or even lower than that of BA.2.75. Our multiscale investigation provides evidence suggesting that XBB is the first observed SARS-CoV-2 variant to increase its fitness through recombination rather than substitutions

DataSheet1_Unveiling the affinity–stability relationship in anti-measles virus antibodies: a computational approach for hotspots prediction.PDF

Recent years have seen an uptick in the use of computational applications in antibody engineering. These tools have enhanced our ability to predict interactions with antigens and immunogenicity, facilitate humanization, and serve other critical functions. However, several studies highlight the concern of potential trade-offs between antibody affinity and stability in antibody engineering. In this study, we analyzed anti-measles virus antibodies as a case study, to examine the relationship between binding affinity and stability, upon identifying the binding hotspots. We leverage in silico tools like Rosetta and FoldX, along with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, offering a cost-effective alternative to traditional in vitro mutagenesis. We introduced a pattern in identifying key residues in pairs, shedding light on hotspots identification. Experimental physicochemical analysis validated the predicted key residues by confirming significant decrease in binding affinity for the high-affinity antibodies to measles virus hemagglutinin. Through the nature of the identified pairs, which represented the relative hydropathy of amino acid side chain, a connection was proposed between affinity and stability. The findings of the study enhance our understanding of the interactions between antibody and measles virus hemagglutinin. Moreover, the implications of the observed correlation between binding affinity and stability extend beyond the field of anti-measles virus antibodies, thereby opening doors for advancements in antibody research.</p