Parameters for the scallop submodel.

<p>Items, except for discard mortality rates, have different values for Georges Bank (GB) and Mid Atlantic (MA).</p><p>Parameters for the scallop submodel.</p

Mean ± SD (n = 100) model forecasts out to 2050 using CO₂ forcing from RCP 8.5 and 1.4°C SST warming (blue) and forecasts with constant 2008 CO₂ concentration and temperature (red).

<p>Deep box (A) pH and (B) calcite saturation state from Georges Bank, (C) landings, (D) total spawning stock biomass (scallops >40mm shell height), (E) revenue (2011 USD), and (F) fractional landings in category U10 (meat weight 10 and under scallops/lb).</p

US sea scallop harvests through time (NMFS commercial harvest data accessed January 28, 2014).

<p>Values are adjusted to 2011 US dollars.</p

Relative change in adult/juvenile (>40 mm) bivalve growth or calcification vs. relative change in Ω from literature studies.

<p>Includes 8 different species from 6 different studies. Dashed lines are 95% confidence intervals.</p

Schematic of IAM.

<p>Biogeochemical submodel components are orange, scallop submodel components are blue, and socioeconomic submodel components are green.</p

Actual (NEFSC 2010, CASA estimated July 1) and modeled whole stock (A) biomass and (B) abundance.

<p>Data from year 2000 are model initial conditions.</p

Actual (NMFS commercial landings accessed Jan. 28, 2014) and modeled ex-vessel (A) revenue and (B) landings.

<p>Data from year 2000 are model initial conditions.</p

Initial conditions for the socioeconomic and scallop submodels for year 2000.

<p>All dollars reported in 2011 USD.</p><p>Initial conditions for the socioeconomic and scallop submodels for year 2000.</p

Regional dependence, by ocean province [49], on ecosystem services and average CO₂-related threats (ocean acidification measured as projected Ω_ar levels at coral reefs in 2050 and elevated sea surface temperature as measured by year that 8 DHW are projected to occur annually).

<p>The horizontal line in the threats panel represents the mean threat for all regions (scores above this line indicate above average severity of threat). The scales for the reef fish dependence scores are broken to reduce the size of the graph. Note that the Great Barrier Reef Ocean Province includes, but is not limited to, the Great Barrier Reef.</p

Scores of human dependence on coral reef ecosystem services, by country.

<p>Panel A provides the normalized scores for human dependence on shoreline protection, Panel B shows the normalized scores for dependence on reef fisheries, and Panel C shows combined human dependence. All scores are normalized on a scale from 0–10. Higher scores reflect higher human dependence. Countries are binned by quintile in the legend.</p