Interest in and barriers to practicing yoga among family caregivers of people with cancer

Background: Family caregivers of people with cancer report high levels of psychological distress. Yoga, with well-documented mental health benefits, could be a useful intervention to address distress in this population. However, little is known about yoga practices among cancer caregivers. The present study evaluates their interest in and barriers to yoga practice. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study of family caregivers of cancer patients at five suburban satellite locations of an academic cancer center. Survey items and statistical analyses focused on yoga usage as well as interest in and barriers to yoga practice. Results: Among 539 participants, most were females (64.8%), white (84.2%), and caring for a spouse or partner (54.7%). Interest in practicing yoga among study participants was 42.3%. Increased interest was independently associated with being females (odds ratio [OR] = 3.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.98–5.51, P < 0.001) and employed (part-time: OR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.1–6.18, P = 0.03; full-time: OR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.1–2.01, P = 0.02). Few participants (6.3%) were currently practicing yoga, although 31% had done so in the past. Sixty-one percent of those who had practiced before their loved one's diagnosis stopped practicing yoga afterward. Commonly cited barriers to yoga practice included time constraints (37.3%) and psychological obstacles (33.6%). About a quarter of those who had never practiced yoga lacked awareness of yoga's benefits (26.6%). Conclusion: Despite the low use of yoga, interest in practicing was moderately high, especially among women and employed caregivers. As caregivers face numerous barriers to yoga practice, strategies are needed to overcome these barriers and help them access yoga's health benefits

Translatomic response of retinal Müller glia to acute and chronic stress

Analysis of retina cell type-specific epigenetic and transcriptomic signatures is crucial to understanding the pathophysiology of retinal degenerations such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and delineating cell autonomous and cell-non-autonomous mechanisms. We have discovered that Aldh1l1 is specifically expressed in the major macroglia of the retina, Müller glia, and, unlike the brain, is not expressed in retinal astrocytes. This allows use of Aldh1l1 cre drivers and Nuclear Tagging and Translating Ribosome Affinity Purification (NuTRAP) constructs for temporally controlled labeling and paired analysis of Müller glia epigenomes and translatomes. As validated through a variety of approaches, the Aldh1l1cre/ERT2-NuTRAP model provides Müller glia specific translatomic and epigenomic profiles without the need to isolate whole cells. Application of this approach to models of acute injury (optic nerve crush) and chronic stress (aging) uncovered few common Müller glia-specific transcriptome changes in inflammatory pathways, and mostly differential signatures for each stimulus. The expression of members of the IL-6 and integrin-linked kinase signaling pathways was enhanced in Müller glia in response to optic nerve crush but not aging. Unique changes in neuroinflammation and fibrosis signaling pathways were observed in response to aging but not with optic nerve crush. The Aldh1l1cre/ERT2-NuTRAP model allows focused molecular analyses of a single, minority cell type within the retina, providing more substantial effect sizes than whole tissue analyses. The NuTRAP model, nucleic acid isolation, and validation approaches presented here can be applied to any retina cell type for which a cell type-specific cre is available