Synteny conservation between two distantly-related Rosaceae genomes: (the stone fruits) and (the strawberry)-2

Ith = 9 chromosomes (A1–A9). Only major chromosomal rearrangements (fusion/fission or translocation events involving more than two common markers between the two genomes) have been considered.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Synteny conservation between two distantly-related Rosaceae genomes: (the stone fruits) and (the strawberry)"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2229/8/67</p><p>BMC Plant Biology 2008;8():67-67.</p><p>Published online 18 Jun 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2442709.</p><p></p

Synteny conservation between two distantly-related Rosaceae genomes: (the stone fruits) and (the strawberry)-0

In the framework of the reference maps of both genera. In parentheses after the markers is the distance from the origin of the linkage group to the marker for markers that have been mapped using the whole or population. RFLP names are written in black and EST-derived markers in grey. The distance from the origin is not shown for markers that were bin-mapped, which are located within the region of the bin, indicated by a solid vertical bar at the corresponding locations on each of the linkage groups. Markers of one linkage group with correspondence in the other genome to linkage groups other than those that are in the neighbourhood have been indicated by the name of the corresponding group in parenthesis.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Synteny conservation between two distantly-related Rosaceae genomes: (the stone fruits) and (the strawberry)"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2229/8/67</p><p>BMC Plant Biology 2008;8():67-67.</p><p>Published online 18 Jun 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2442709.</p><p></p

Synteny conservation between two distantly-related Rosaceae genomes: (the stone fruits) and (the strawberry)-3

In the framework of the reference maps of both genera. In parentheses after the markers is the distance from the origin of the linkage group to the marker for markers that have been mapped using the whole or population. RFLP names are written in black and EST-derived markers in grey. The distance from the origin is not shown for markers that were bin-mapped, which are located within the region of the bin, indicated by a solid vertical bar at the corresponding locations on each of the linkage groups. Markers of one linkage group with correspondence in the other genome to linkage groups other than those that are in the neighbourhood have been indicated by the name of the corresponding group in parenthesis.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Synteny conservation between two distantly-related Rosaceae genomes: (the stone fruits) and (the strawberry)"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2229/8/67</p><p>BMC Plant Biology 2008;8():67-67.</p><p>Published online 18 Jun 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2442709.</p><p></p

Mean squares, GCA/SCA ratio [26], and narrow sense (<i>h</i>^<i>2</i>) and broad sense heritabilities (<i>H</i>^<i>2</i>) for the ANOVA for conventional morphological and Tomato Analyzer fruitdescriptors.

<p>Materials evaluated include 10 parents and 45 hybrids of eggplant. Griffing’s (1956) Method 2 Model 1 (fixed effects) of diallel analysis was used.</p

Fruits of the 10 eggplant parentals used in the diallel analysis.

<p>Materials include nine cultivated <i>S</i>. <i>melongena</i> (A0416, ANS26, ASIS1, DH621, H15, IVIA371, MEL1, MEL5, and MM1597) and one weedy <i>S</i>. <i>insanum</i> (INS2) accessions. Fruits are not depicted at the same scale; the size of the grid cells is 1 cm × 1 cm.</p

General combining ability estimates of parents for conventional morphological and Tomato Analyzer fruit descriptors for the 10 eggplant parents evaluated.

<p>General combining ability estimates of parents for conventional morphological and Tomato Analyzer fruit descriptors for the 10 eggplant parents evaluated.</p

Correlations between genetic distances among parents and hybrid trait values, heterosis (<i>Het</i>), and specific combining ability (SCA).

<p>Results are presented considering the 10 eggplant parents (nine cultivated <i>S</i>. <i>melongena</i> and one weedy <i>S</i>. <i>insanum</i>; n = 45 hybrids), and only the nine <i>S</i>. <i>melongena</i> parents (n = 36 hybrids).</p

Average values and ranges of variation.

<p>Traits evaluated include conventional morphological and Tomato Analyzer descriptors in eggplant parents and their hybrids. Probability of the <i>t</i>-test for comparison between parent and hybrid means is also included.</p

Range of specific combining ability (SCA) estimates.

<p>Values are expressed as percentage over the mean of the 45 hybrids obtained among 10 eggplant parents.</p

UPGMA dendrogram displaying relationships of nine <i>S</i>. <i>melongena</i> (A0416, ANS26, ASIS1, DH621, H15, IVIA371, MEL1, MEL5, and MM1597) and one <i>S</i>. <i>insanum</i> (INS2) accessions based on 7,335 polymorphic SNPs.

<p>Phenetic relationships among accessions were derived from Hamming distance (bitwise distance). Bootstrap values (based on 1000 replications; expressed in percentage) are indicated at the corresponding nodes.</p