Factors Associated with Wuchereria bancrofti Microfilaremia in an Endemic Area of Mali

Although Wuchereria bancrofti (Wb), the causative agent of lymphatic filariasis, is endemic throughout Mali, the prevalence of Wb microfilaremia (Mf) can vary widely between villages despite similar prevalence of infection as assessed by circulating antigen. To examine this variation, cross-sectional data obtained during screening prior to an interventional study in two neighboring villages in Mali were analyzed. The overall prevalence of Wb, as assessed by Wb Cag (circulating antigen), was 50.3% among 373 participants, aged 14-65. Wb Mf-positive and negative individuals appeared randomly distributed across the two villages (Moran’s I spatial statistic = -0.01, Z score = 0.1, P > 0.05). Among the 187 subjects positive for Wb CAg, 117 (62.5%) had detectable Mansonella perstans microfilaremia (Mp Mf) and 64(34.2%) had detectable Wb microfilaremia. The prevalence of Mp microfilaremia was 73.4% in the Wb Mf-positive group (as compared to 56.9% in the Wb Mf-negative group; p=0.01), and median Wb Mf load was increased in co-infected subjects (267 Mf/ml vs 100 Mf/ml; p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, village of residence, Mp Mf positivity and gender were significantly associated with Wb Mf positivity. After controlling for age, gender and village of residence, the odds of being Wb Mf positive was 2.67 times higher in Mp positive individuals (95% CI [1.42-5.01]). Given the geographical overlap between Mp and Wb in Africa, a better understanding of the distribution and prevalence of Mp could assist national LF control programs in predicting areas of high Wb mf prevalence that may require closer surveillance

Maternal HIV-1 disease progression 18-24 months postdelivery according to antiretroviral prophylaxis regimen (triple-antiretroviral prophylaxis during pregnancy and breastfeeding vs zidovudine/single-dose nevirapine prophylaxis): the Kesho Bora randomized controlled trial

Background. Antiretroviral (ARV) prophylaxis effectively reduces mother-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV). However, it is unclear whether stopping ARVs after breastfeeding cessation affects maternal HIV disease progression. We assessed 18-24-month postpartum disease progression risk among women in a randomized trial assessing efficacy and safety of prophylactic maternal ARVs. Methods. From 2005 to 2008, HIV-infected pregnant women with CD4(+) counts of 200-500/mm(3) were randomized to receive either triple ARV (zidovudine, lamivudine, and lopinavir/ritonavir during pregnancy and breastfeeding) or AZT/sdNVP (zidovudine until delivery with single-dose nevirapine without postpartum prophylaxis). Maternal disease progression was defined as the combined endpoint of death, World Health Organization clinical stage 4 disease, or CD4(+) counts of <200/mm(3). Results. Among 824 randomized women, 789 had at least 1 study visit after cessation of ARV prophylaxis. Following delivery, progression risk up to 24 months postpartum in the triple ARV arm was significantly lower than in the AZT/sdNVP arm (15.7% vs 28.3%; P = .001), but the risks of progression after cessation of ARV prophylaxis (rather than after delivery) were not different (15.0% vs 13.8% 18 months after ARV cessation). Among women with CD4(+) counts of 200-349/mm(3) at enrollment, 24.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.7-35.5) progressed with triple ARV, and 23.0% (95% CI, 17.8-29.5) progressed with AZT/sdNVP, whereas few women in either arm (= 350/mm(3) progressed. Conclusions. Interrupting prolonged triple ARV prophylaxis had no effect on HIV progression following cessation (compared with AZT/sdNVP). However, women on triple ARV prophylaxis had lower progression risk during the time on triple ARV. Given the high rate of progression among women with CD4(+) cells of <350/mm(3), ARVs should not be discontinued in this group