69 research outputs found

    Performance of variable subsets on simulated datasets.

    No full text
    <p>A) LOI dataset (wKIERA settings: <i>poolsize</i>β€Š=β€Š10, <i>maxiter</i>β€Š=β€Š400, <i>rep</i>β€Š=β€Š2000, wkRBF Οβ€Š=β€Š0.1); B) NLG dataset (<i>poolsize</i>β€Š=β€Š10, <i>maxiter</i>β€Š=β€Š400, <i>rep</i>β€Š=β€Š2000, wkPoly dβ€Š=β€Š2). <u>Top</u>: Average SVM accuracy on 100 randomly train/test splits using subsets of variables obtained by thresholding the estimated factors of a weighted kernel with the corresponding cutoff on horizontal axis. Resulting subset size (number of variables) is shown in brackets. <u>Middle</u>: Comparison of classification accuracy of SVM trained using variables selected by best-wKIERA-ranked (red); worst-wKIERA-ranked (black); rank correlation coefficients (blue) and using all variables (green). Results are averaged over 100 randomly training/test splits. <u>Bottom</u>: ROC-space analysis of the SVM classifiers shown in the mid plot.</p

    Selected variables in synthetic datasets by wKIERA (<i>poolsize</i>β€Š=β€Š10, <i>maxiter</i>β€Š=β€Š400).

    No full text
    <p>Type of kernel used in each dataset, weighted RBF kernel (wkRBF) or weighted Polynomial kernel (wkPoly), is showed in rightmost column. Numbers in <b><i>bold-italic</i></b> represent true relevant variables.</p

    Performance of variable subsets on proteomic datasets.

    No full text
    <p>A) HAT dataset (wKIERA settings: <i>poolsize</i>β€Š=β€Š10, <i>maxiter</i>β€Š=β€Š400, <i>rep</i>β€Š=β€Š2000, wkRBF Οβ€Š=β€Š0.01); B) TB dataset (<i>poolsize</i>β€Š=β€Š10, <i>maxiter</i>β€Š=β€Š400, <i>rep</i>β€Š=β€Š2000, wkRBF Οβ€Š=β€Š1). C) MALARIA dataset (<i>poolsize</i>β€Š=β€Š10, <i>maxiter</i>β€Š=β€Š400, <i>rep</i>β€Š=β€Š2000, wkRBF Οβ€Š=β€Š1). <u>Top</u>, <u>Middle</u> and <u>Bottom</u>: See legend on <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0001806#pone-0001806-g002" target="_blank">Figure 2</a>.</p

    Performance of variable subsets on gene expression microarray datasets.

    No full text
    <p>A) COLON CANCER dataset (wKIERA settings: <i>poolsize</i>β€Š=β€Š100, <i>maxiter</i>β€Š=β€Š1000, <i>rep</i>β€Š=β€Š1000, wkRBF Οβ€Š=β€Š0.1); B) GLIAL CANCER dataset (<i>poolsize</i>β€Š=β€Š100, <i>maxiter</i>β€Š=β€Š1000, <i>rep</i>β€Š=β€Š1000, wkRBF Οβ€Š=β€Š1Γ—10<sup>βˆ’5</sup>). <u>Top</u>, <u>Middle</u> and <u>Bottom</u>: See legend on <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0001806#pone-0001806-g002" target="_blank">Figure 2</a>.</p

    The number and position of SNP sites per gene co-associating with the <i>P</i>. <i>knowelsi</i> genome-wide dimorphism.

    No full text
    <p>Non-synonymous polymorphisms (red) are shown above the line and synonymous polymorphisms (blue) are shown below the line. The line is drawn at zero. The chromosomes are drawn to scale and the height of the bars represents the number of SNP sites per gene per region of each chromosome. The scale is given in the boxed area and is the number of SNP sites per gene.</p

    A screen shot of Artemis DNA view comparing six <i>Plasmodium knowlesi</i> genome sequences from patient isolates to the <i>Plasmodium knowlesi</i> H strain reference genome sequence.

    No full text
    <p>The <i>P</i>. <i>knowlesi normocyte binding protein xa</i> locus on chromosome 14 is shown. The screen shot shows segregation of the sequences from patient isolates into two groups, (n = 3 in each group) and the dimorphism is clearly visible.</p
    • …
    corecore