Sequoyah v. TVA, USDC Northern District of TN, Docket No. 3-79-418: TVA’s Brief in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss, or, for Summary Judgment, and in Opposition to Plaintiffs’’ Motion for restraining Order or Preliminary Injunction

Brief prepared by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) in the suit brought by Native American groups seeking an injunction on the Tellico Project. The brief is followed by extensive appendices, including sections of TVA annual reports, and affidavits by John E. Linn, Title Attorney, Tennessee Valley Authority, Ross O. Swimmer, Principal Chief of the Cherokee Nation, and Edward H. Lessne, Director of the Division of Water Resources in the Office of Natural Resources of the Tennessee Valley Authority

Brief of Tennessee Valley Authority in Support of Motion to Dismiss and in Opposition to Motion for Injunction, \u3cem\u3eTVA v. Hill et al\u3c/em\u3e, Civil Action No. 3-71-48

Brief for the defendants in support of a motion to dismiss and in opposition to a motion for an injunction in the case of TVA v. Hill et al in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Northern Division

TVA’s Brief in Reply to Plaintiffs’ Post-Trial Brief, \u3cem\u3eTVA v. Hill et al\u3c/em\u3e, Civil Action No. 3-76-48

Brief for the defendants in response to the plaintiffs\u27 post-trial brief in the case of TVA v. Hill et al in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Northern Division

Post-Trial Brief of Tennessee Valley Authority, \u3cem\u3eTVA v. Hill et al\u3c/em\u3e, Civil Action No. 3-76-48

Post-trial brief for the defendants in the case of TVA v. Hill et al in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Northern Division

Trial Brief of TVA, \u3cem\u3eTVA v. Hill et al\u3c/em\u3e, Civil Action No. 3-76-48

Brief for the defendants in the case of TVA v. Hill et al in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Northern Divisio

Reply Brief for the Petitioner, \u3cem\u3eTVA v. Hill\u3c/em\u3e, No. 76-1701

Reply brief for the petitioner in the case of Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hiram G. Hill Jr., et al., heard by the United States Supreme Court in the October Term of 1977

Brief for the Petitioner, \u3cem\u3eTVA v. Hill\u3c/em\u3e, No. 76-1701

Brief for the petitioner in the case of Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hiram G. Hill Jr., et al., heard by the United States Supreme Court in the October Term of 1977

Defendants\u27 Motion to Dismiss, \u3cem\u3eTVA v. Hill et al\u3c/em\u3e, Civil Action No. 3-76-48

TVA\u27s motion to dismiss the civil action on the grounds that the plaintiffs failed to comply with statutory notice requirements in the case of TVA v. Hill et al in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Northern Division

Sequoyah v. TVA, 6th Circuit, Docket No. 79-1633: Brief of Defendant-Appellee Tennessee Valley Authority

The Tennessee Valley Authority\u27s brief in the appeal of the case of Sequoyah v. TVA. Documents relevant to the case, including an affidavit by Ross O. Swimmer, Principal Chief of the Cherokee Nation, are appended to the brief