5 research outputs found
Scanning and transmission electron micrographs of biofilms, cells and hami.
<p>Left panels: MSI, right panel: SM. A: Scanning electron micrograph of MSI biofilm, showing SM1 euryarchaeal cells with defined distances and cell-cell connections. Bar: 1 µm. B: Scanning electron micrograph of SM biofilm, showing SM1 euryarchaeal cells with defined distances and fine-structured cell-cell connections. In-between: Bacterial filamentous and rod-shaped cells. Bar: 1 µm. C: Scanning electron micrograph of dividing SM1 euryarchaeal cell (MSI) with cell surface appendages. Bar: 200 nm. D: Scanning electron micrograph of dividing SM1 euryarchaeal cell (SM) with cell surface appendages. Bar: 200 nm. E: Transmission electron micrograph of cell surface appendages (hami) of SM1 euryarchaeal cells from the MSI biofilm. The hami carry the nano-grappling hooks, but besides that appear bare (square), without prickles (Moissl et al 2005). Bar: 100 nm. F: Transmission electron micrograph of cell surface appendages and matrix of SM1 euryarchaeal cells from the SM biofilm. The hami reveal the typical ultrastructure, with nano-grappling hooks and barbwire-like prickle region (square, Moissl et al 2005). Bar: 100 nm.</p
Quantification of archaeal and bacterial signatures via qPCR, FISH and SR-FTIR (values in brackes give standard deviation).
<p>*data from Probst et al., 2013.</p><p>ND: Not Determined.</p
The conversion of biofilm to string-of-pearls community in the spring water originating from the subsurface.
<p>A: Biofilm. B: Intermediate transition state. C: String-of-pearls community. Row 1: Schematic drawings. Orange: SM1 euryarchaeal cocci, Green: Filamentous, sulfide-oxidizing bacteria. Row 2: Photographs and scanning electron micrograph (2B) of different stages. Row 3: FISH images of different stages (for MSI samples please see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0099801#pone.0099801-Probst1" target="_blank">[15]</a>; Archaea orange (CY3), Bacteria green (RG)). A: SM-BF, showing high dominance of Archaea. B: Attachment of archaea to filamentous bacteria. C: String-of-pearls communities with large archaeal colony and bacterial mantle. Arrows point to archaeal microcolonies, manteled by filamentous bacteria. It is proposed that attachment of SM1 Euryarchaeota to filamentous bacteria (B) mediates the transition from biofilm (A) to the string-of-pearls community (C). Scale bars: A3: 10 µm, B2: 1 µm B3: 10 mm, C3: 25 µm.</p
Scanning electron micrograph of filamentous bacterium and surrounded and cocooned by the SM1 euryarchaeal cells (SM-BF).
<p>Bar: 1 µm.</p
Detailed community profiling using PhyloChip G3 and SR-FTIR.
<p>A: Ordination analysis of PhyloChip G3 data based on weighted UniFrac measure of eOTU abundances followed by non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS). Stress for NMDS of archaeal eOTUs (#37): 0.0088. Stress for NMDS of bacterial eOTUs (#1300): 0.0223. B: Heatmap displaying significantly different families found between the two biofilm types, MSI-BF and SM-BF by PhyloChip G3 assay. Significance is based on aggregated HybScores of eOTUs on family level followed by a Welch-test. For false discovery detection please see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0099801#pone.0099801.s006" target="_blank">Fig. S6</a>. C: Ordination analysis of SR-FTIR data based on a linear discriminant analysis and principal component analysis (PCA-LDA) in the spectral region of 2800–3100 cm<sup>−1</sup> on the archaea spectra extracted from the maps from the three different locations. On the right there is the plot of PCA-LDA loadings. PCA-LDA1 explains for the 93.4% of the variance, PCA-LDA2 for 5.3% and PCA-LDA3 for 0.9%. Arrows point to the infrared signals used to explain the difference between the samples: 2975 cm<sup>−1</sup>, 2965 cm<sup>−1</sup>, 2924 cm<sup>−1</sup> and 2850 cm<sup>−1</sup>. D: PCA-LDA in the spectral regions of 900–1280 cm<sup>−1</sup> and 2800–3100 cm<sup>−1</sup> on SR-FTIR spectra of the bacteria “pixels” from the chemical maps of the samples at the three different locations. On the right there is a plot of PCA-LDA loadings in the two spectral region of interest. PCA-LDA1 explains for the 54.5% of the variance, PCA-LDA2 for 28.6% and PCA-LDA3 for 7.3%. Arrows point to the main infrared signals used to explain the difference between the samples: 2958 cm<sup>−1</sup>, 2925 cm<sup>−1</sup>, 2870 cm<sup>−1</sup> and 2850 cm<sup>−1</sup>, in the second panel 1250 cm<sup>−1</sup>, 1110 cm<sup>−1</sup>, 1080 cm<sup>−1</sup> and 1045 cm<sup>−1</sup>.</p