Functional significance of recruitable collaterals during temporary coronary occlusion evaluated by 99mTc-sestamibi single-photon emission computerized tomography

AbstractOBJECTIVESThe present study evaluated the impact of recruitable collaterals on regional myocardial perfusion measured by 99mtechnetium (Tc)-sestamibi single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) during temporary coronary occlusion and related these estimates to the coronary wedge pressure and electrocardiographic (ECG) ST-segment changes.BACKGROUNDClinical variables (angina and ECG changes) and intracoronary flow and pressure recordings have indicated a protective role of recruitable collaterals on myocardial perfusion during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA).METHODSThirty patients (mean age 55 years, SD 9; 20 men) with stable angina pectoris and proximal nonoccluding single-vessel left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD)-stenosis scheduled for PTCA were included. Visualization of recruitable collaterals by ipsilateral and contralateral contrast injection, registration of coronary wedge pressure and injection of 99mTc-sestamibi during 90-s LAD occlusions were undertaken. A rest perfusion study was performed within four days before PTCA. As an estimate of the severity of regional hypoperfusion during occlusion, an occlusion/rest count ratio was calculated (mean defect pixel count during occlusion divided by mean pixel count in identical regions at rest).RESULTSThe scintigraphic occlusion/rest count ratio was higher in patients with recruitable collaterals (n = 16), 67 ± 11%, compared to patients without collaterals (n = 14), 60 ± 6% (p < 0.05). The occlusion/rest count ratio correlated with the coronary wedge pressure (R2= 0.34; p < 0.001). The occlusion/rest count ratio was lower, 61 ± 6%, in patients with ST-segment elevation (n = 23) versus 74 ± 9% in patients without ST-segment elevation (n = 7) (p < 0.0001).CONCLUSIONSUsing 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT imaging during brief episodes of coronary occlusion, the severity of regional myocardial hypoperfusion was reduced by the presence of recruitable collaterals in a selected patient population with proximal LAD stenoses. Our results demonstrate a protective effect of recruitable collaterals on myocardial perfusion during temporary coronary occlusion

Prediction of Coronary Revascularization in Stable Angina: Comparison of FFRCT With CMR Stress Perfusion Imaging.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to compare head-to-head fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) (FFRCT) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) stress perfusion imaging for prediction of standard-of-care-guided coronary revascularization in patients with stable chest pain and obstructive coronary artery disease by coronary CTA. BACKGROUND: FFRCT is a novel modality for noninvasive functional testing. The clinical utility of FFRCT compared to CMR stress perfusion imaging in symptomatic patients with coronary artery disease is unknown. METHODS: Prospective study of patients (n=110) with stable angina pectoris and 1 or more coronary stenosis ≥50% by coronary CTA. All patients underwent invasive coronary angiography. Revascularization was FFR-guided in stenoses ranging from 30% to 90%. FFRCT ≤0.80 in 1 or more coronary artery or a reversible perfusion defect (≥2 segments) by CMR categorized patients with ischemia. FFRCT and CMR were analyzed by core laboratories blinded for patient management. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients (35%) underwent revascularization. Per-patient diagnostic performance for identifying standard-of-care-guided revascularization, (95% confidence interval) yielded a sensitivity of 97% (86 to 100) for FFRCT versus 47% (31 to 64) for CMR, p  0.05, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stable chest pain referred to invasive coronary angiography based on coronary CTA, FFRCT and CMR yielded similar overall diagnostic accuracy. Sensitivity for prediction of revascularization was highest for FFRCT, whereas specificity was highest for CMR.Danish Heart Foundation (grant no. 15-R99-A5837-22920)Health Research Fund of Central Denmark Regio

Coronary volume to left ventricular mass ratio in patients with diabetes mellitus

BackgroundDiabetes mellitus is a major risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD) and may provoke structural and functional changes in coronary vasculature. The coronary volume to left ventricular mass (V/M) ratio is a new anatomical parameter capable of revealing a potential physiological imbalance between coronary vasculature and myocardial mass. The aim of this study was to examine the V/M derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in patients with diabetes.MethodsPatients with clinically suspected CAD enrolled in the ADVANCE (Assessing Diagnostic Value of Non-invasive FFRCT in Coronary Care) registry and known diabetic status were included. Coronary artery volume and left ventricular myocardial mass were analyzed from CCTA and the V/M ratio was calculated and compared between patients with and without diabetes.ResultsOf the 3053 patients (age 66 ​± ​10 years; 66% male) with known diabetic status, diabetes was present in 21.9%. Coronary volume was lower in patients with diabetes compared to those without diabetes (2850 ​± ​940 ​mm3 vs. 3040 ​± ​970 ​mm3, p ​ConclusionThe V/M ratio was significantly lower in patients with diabetes compared to non-diabetics, even after correcting for obstructive coronary stenosis. The clinical value of the reduced V/M ratio in diabetic patients needs further investigation.</p

Impact of COVID-19 on cardiovascular testing in the United States versus the rest of the world

Objectives: This study sought to quantify and compare the decline in volumes of cardiovascular procedures between the United States and non-US institutions during the early phase of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the care of many non-COVID-19 illnesses. Reductions in diagnostic cardiovascular testing around the world have led to concerns over the implications of reduced testing for cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality. Methods: Data were submitted to the INCAPS-COVID (International Atomic Energy Agency Non-Invasive Cardiology Protocols Study of COVID-19), a multinational registry comprising 909 institutions in 108 countries (including 155 facilities in 40 U.S. states), assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on volumes of diagnostic cardiovascular procedures. Data were obtained for April 2020 and compared with volumes of baseline procedures from March 2019. We compared laboratory characteristics, practices, and procedure volumes between U.S. and non-U.S. facilities and between U.S. geographic regions and identified factors associated with volume reduction in the United States. Results: Reductions in the volumes of procedures in the United States were similar to those in non-U.S. facilities (68% vs. 63%, respectively; p = 0.237), although U.S. facilities reported greater reductions in invasive coronary angiography (69% vs. 53%, respectively; p < 0.001). Significantly more U.S. facilities reported increased use of telehealth and patient screening measures than non-U.S. facilities, such as temperature checks, symptom screenings, and COVID-19 testing. Reductions in volumes of procedures differed between U.S. regions, with larger declines observed in the Northeast (76%) and Midwest (74%) than in the South (62%) and West (44%). Prevalence of COVID-19, staff redeployments, outpatient centers, and urban centers were associated with greater reductions in volume in U.S. facilities in a multivariable analysis. Conclusions: We observed marked reductions in U.S. cardiovascular testing in the early phase of the pandemic and significant variability between U.S. regions. The association between reductions of volumes and COVID-19 prevalence in the United States highlighted the need for proactive efforts to maintain access to cardiovascular testing in areas most affected by outbreaks of COVID-19 infection