7 research outputs found

    Chromosome 10Q2432 Variants associate With Brain arterial Diameters in Diverse Populations: a Genome-Wide association Study

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Brain arterial diameters (BADs) are novel imaging biomarkers of cerebrovascular disease, cognitive decline, and dementia. Traditional vascular risk factors have been associated with BADs, but whether there may be genetic determinants of BADs is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: The authors studied 4150 participants from 6 geographically diverse population-based cohorts (40% European, 14% African, 22% Hispanic, 24% Asian ancestries). Brain arterial diameters for 13 segments were measured and averaged to obtain a global measure of BADs as well as the posterior and anterior circulations. A genome-wide association study revealed 14 variants at one locus associated with global BAD at genome-wide significance ( CONCLUSIONS: The current study reveals 3 novel risk loci

    Chromosome 10q24.32 Variants Associate With Brain Arterial Diameters in Diverse Populations: A Genome‐Wide Association Study

    No full text
    Background Brain arterial diameters (BADs) are novel imaging biomarkers of cerebrovascular disease, cognitive decline, and dementia. Traditional vascular risk factors have been associated with BADs, but whether there may be genetic determinants of BADs is unknown. Methods and Results The authors studied 4150 participants from 6 geographically diverse population‐based cohorts (40% European, 14% African, 22% Hispanic, 24% Asian ancestries). Brain arterial diameters for 13 segments were measured and averaged to obtain a global measure of BADs as well as the posterior and anterior circulations. A genome‐wide association study revealed 14 variants at one locus associated with global BAD at genome‐wide significance (P<5×10−8) (top single‐nucleotide polymorphism, rs7921574; β=0.06 [P=1.54×10−8]). This locus mapped to an intron of CNNM2. A trans‐ancestry genome‐wide association study meta‐analysis identified 2 more loci at NT5C2 (rs10748839; P=2.54×10−8) and AS3MT (rs10786721; P=4.97×10−8), associated with global BAD. In addition, 2 single‐nucleotide polymorphisms colocalized with expression of CNNM2 (rs7897654; β=0.12 [P=6.17×10−7]) and AL356608.1 (rs10786719; β=−0.17 [P=6.60×10−6]) in brain tissue. For the posterior BAD, 2 variants at one locus mapped to an intron of TCF25 were identified (top single‐nucleotide polymorphism, rs35994878; β=0.11 [P=2.94×10−8]). For the anterior BAD, one locus at ADAP1 was identified in trans‐ancestry genome‐wide association analysis (rs34217249; P=3.11×10−8). Conclusions The current study reveals 3 novel risk loci (CNNM2, NT5C2, and AS3MT) associated with BADs. These findings may help elucidate the mechanism by which BADs may influence cerebrovascular health

    The Advisory Group on Risk Evidence Education for Dementia: Multidisciplinary and Open to All.

    No full text
    The brain changes of Alzheimer's disease and other degenerative dementias begin long before cognitive dysfunction develops, and in people with subtle cognitive complaints, clinicians often struggle to predict who will develop dementia. The public increasingly sees benefits to accessing dementia risk evidence (DRE) such as biomarkers, predictive algorithms, and genetic information, particularly as this information moves from research to demonstrated usefulness in guiding diagnosis and clinical management. For example, the knowledge that one has high levels of amyloid in the brain may lead one to seek amyloid reducing medications, plan for disability, or engage in health promoting behaviors to fight cognitive decline. Researchers often hesitate to share DRE data, either because they are insufficiently validated or reliable for use in individuals, or there are concerns about assuring responsible use and ensuring adequate understanding of potential problems when one's biomarker status is known. Concerns include warning people receiving DRE about situations in which they might be compelled to disclose their risk status potentially leading to discrimination or stigma. The Advisory Group on Risk Evidence Education for Dementia (AGREEDementia) welcomes all concerned with how best to share and use DRE. Supporting understanding in clinicians, stakeholders, and people with or at risk for dementia and clearly delineating risks, benefits, and gaps in knowledge is vital. This brief overview describes elements that made this group effective as a model for other health conditions where there is interest in unfettered collaboration to discuss diagnostic uncertainty and the appropriate use and communication of health-related risk information

    Rationale and Design for a GRADE Substudy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring

    No full text
    corecore