8,731 research outputs found

    Marketing Tips for Small-scale, Local Honey Bee Keepers in Northwest Arkansas

    Get PDF
    The objective of this thesis was to gain market information for beekeepers regarding different honey bee products and to provide information about economic feasibility when produced on a small, local scale. Since cost-of-production information about operating an apiary is widely available, the focus of this work was on gaining marketing knowledge. One of the objectives of the surveys was to develop a better sense of what potential resellers of honey bee products considered locally produced. Another objective was to determine preferences for honey bee product packaging as well as bee pollination services. Using that feedback, a marketing plan for different niche markets can be developed for part-time beekeeping operations. The survey results pertaining to local retailers and end users in Northwest Arkansas in 2016 suggested a supply radius near 100 miles and a preference for small packaging in general. Least cost supply, and at least regional brand recognition were not deemed as important as ensuring locally sourced products that can be sold at a premium. Different niche markets revealed both similar and different priorities related to these marketing aspects

    Can Process Theory Constrain Courts?

    Get PDF
    The political process theory introduced by the Carolene Products footnote and developed through subsequent scholarship has shaped much of the modern constitutional landscape. Process theory posits that courts may justifiably intervene in the political arena when institutional obstacles impede corrective action by political actors themselves. Judged by this standard, the United States Supreme Court\u27s decision in Bush v. Gore was a failure, because the majority could not explain why its interference was necessary. More broadly, Bush v. Gore points to a central deficiency in process theory: it relies upon the Justices to guard against their own overreaching, but does not prescribe correctives to such overreaching when it occurs. This Essay argues that the legislative and executive branch cannot check judicial overreaching without threatening judicial independence. The authors suggest that principled criticism of judicial decisions by members of the legal academy can play a checking function but that much of the academic criticism of Bush v. Gore - especially those broadsides that accuse the majority Justices of subjective bad faith - will not be productive in that way. The authors then offer criteria for principled criticism

    Existential characterizations of monadic NIP

    Full text link
    We show that if a universal theory is not monadically NIP, then this is witnessed by a canonical configuration defined by an existential formula. As a consequence, we show that a hereditary class of relational structures is NIP (resp. stable) if and only if it is monadically NIP (resp. monadically stable). As another consequence, we show that if such a class is not monadically NIP, then it has superexponential growth rate.Comment: Added section 5 on growth rates; minor corrections; 23 page

    Can Process Theory Constrain Courts?

    Get PDF
    The political process theory introduced by the Carolene Products footnote and developed through subsequent scholarship has shaped much of the modern constitutional landscape. Process theory posits that courts may justifiably intervene in the political arena when institutional obstacles impede corrective action by political actors themselves. Judged by this standard, the United States Supreme Court\u27s decision in Bush v. Gore was a failure, because the majority could not explain why its interference was necessary. More broadly, Bush v. Gore points to a central deficiency in process theory: it relies upon the Justices to guard against their own overreaching, but does not prescribe correctives to such overreaching when it occurs. This Essay argues that the legislative and executive branch cannot check judicial overreaching without threatening judicial independence. The authors suggest that principled criticism of judicial decisions by members of the legal academy can play a checking function but that much of the academic criticism of Bush v. Gore - especially those broadsides that accuse the majority Justices of subjective bad faith - will not be productive in that way. The authors then offer criteria for principled criticism
    corecore