Raw and standardized canonical coefficients for the canonical discriminant analysis on log-transformed wing measurements data for the fruit fly populations.

<p>Raw and standardized canonical coefficients for the canonical discriminant analysis on log-transformed wing measurements data for the fruit fly populations.</p

Mahalanobis Squared Distances (D²) between clusters representing the species/populations of <i>Bactrocera invadens</i> and other <i>Bactrocera</i> species.

<p>Bcor – <i>B. correcta</i>, Bcu – <i>B. cucurbitae</i>, Bdo – <i>B. dorsalis</i>, Binvadens – <i>B. invadens</i>, Bka – <i>B. kandiensis</i>, Bole – <i>B. oleae</i> and Bzo – <i>B. zonata</i>.</p

Collection data of <i>B. invadens</i> populations and other <i>Bactrocera</i> species used in this study.

<p>Collection data of <i>B. invadens</i> populations and other <i>Bactrocera</i> species used in this study.</p

Key of the veins used in morphometrics analysis.

<p>Key of the veins used in morphometrics analysis.</p

Eigen values and coefficients (loadings) of the first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) for the log-transformed wing measurements data of the fruit fly populations.

<p>Eigen values and coefficients (loadings) of the first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) for the log-transformed wing measurements data of the fruit fly populations.</p

Plots of the principal coordinate analysis (PCA) from the covariance matrix with data standardization calculated using GenAlEx for the <i>Bactrocera</i> species.

<p>Plots of the principal coordinate analysis (PCA) from the covariance matrix with data standardization calculated using GenAlEx for the <i>Bactrocera</i> species.</p

Projection of the wing and tibia data of <i>Bactrocera invadens</i> compared with other <i>Bactrocera</i> species on the first two canonical variates.

<p>Projection of the wing and tibia data of <i>Bactrocera invadens</i> compared with other <i>Bactrocera</i> species on the first two canonical variates.</p

Projection of the wing and tibia data of <i>Bactrocera invadens</i> compared with the other <i>Bactrocera</i> species on the first two principal components.

<p>Projection of the wing and tibia data of <i>Bactrocera invadens</i> compared with the other <i>Bactrocera</i> species on the first two principal components.</p

Evolutionary relationships between <i>Bactocera invadens</i> populations, <i>B. dorsalis s.s</i> and <i>B. kandiensis</i> as inferred using Neighbour-Joining method by Mega 5 program (Tamura <i>et al.</i>, 2011).

<p>Evolutionary relationships between <i>Bactocera invadens</i> populations, <i>B. dorsalis s.s</i> and <i>B. kandiensis</i> as inferred using Neighbour-Joining method by Mega 5 program (Tamura <i>et al.</i>, 2011).</p

Risk assessment and spread of the potentially invasive <i>Ceratitis rosa</i> Karsch and <i>Ceratitis quilicii</i> De Meyer, Mwatawala & Virgilio sp. Nov. using life-cycle simulation models: Implications for phytosanitary measures and management - Fig 4

<p>Temperature-dependent senescence rates (1/days) for adult <i>C</i>. <i>rosa</i> females (4a) and <i>C</i>. <i>rosa</i> males (4b); and for <i>C</i>. <i>quilicii</i> females (4c) and <i>C</i>. <i>quilicii</i> males (4d). Fitted curves: Exponential model for both sexes for each fruit fly species. The upper and lower 95% confidence intervals of the models are indicated. Bar represent standard deviation of the mean.</p