Drug Use and Receipt of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy among HIV-Infected Persons in Two U.S. Clinic Cohorts

Drug use and receipt of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) were assessed in HIV-infected persons from the Comprehensive Care Center (CCC; Nashville, TN) and Johns Hopkins University HIV Clinic (JHU; Baltimore, MD) between 1999 and 2005.Participants with and without injection drug use (IDU) history in the CCC and JHU cohorts were evaluated. Additional analysis of persons with history of IDU, non-injection drug use (NIDU), and no drug use from CCC were performed. Activity of IDU and NIDU also was assessed for the CCC cohort. HAART use and time on HAART were analyzed according to drug use category and site of care.1745 persons were included from CCC: 268 (15%) with IDU history and 796 (46%) with NIDU history. 1977 persons were included from JHU: 731 (35%) with IDU history. Overall, the cohorts differed in IDU risk factor rates, age, race, sex, and time in follow-up. In multivariate analyses, IDU was associated with decreased HAART receipt overall (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: [0.45-0.84] and OR = 0.58, 95% CI: [0.46-0.73], respectively for CCC and JHU) and less time on HAART at JHU (0.70, [0.55-0.88]), but not statistically associated with time on HAART at CCC (0.78, [0.56-1.09]). NIDU was independently associated with decreased HAART receipt (0.62, [0.47-0.81]) and less time on HAART (0.66, [0.52-0.85]) at CCC. These associations were not altered significantly whether patients at CCC were categorized according to historical drug use or drug use during the study period.Persons with IDU history from both clinic populations were less likely to receive HAART and tended to have less cumulative time on HAART. Effects of NIDU were similar to IDU at CCC. NIDU without IDU is an important contributor to HAART utilization

Drug use and receipt of highly active antiretroviral therapy among HIV-infected persons in two U.S. clinic cohorts

Objective: Drug use and receipt of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) were assessed in HIV-infected persons from the Comprehensive Care Center (CCC; Nashville, TN) and Johns Hopkins University HIV Clinic (JHU; Baltimore, MD) between 1999 and 2005. Methods: Participants with and without injection drug use (IDU) history in the CCC and JHU cohorts were evaluated. Additional analysis of persons with history of IDU, non-injection drug use (NIDU), and no drug use from CCC were performed. Activity of IDU and NIDU also was assessed for the CCC cohort. HAART use and time on HAART were analyzed according to drug use category and site of care. Results: 1745 persons were included from CCC: 268 (15%) with IDU history and 796 (46%) with NIDU history. 1977 persons were included from JHU: 731 (35%) with IDU history. Overall, the cohorts differed in IDU risk factor rates, age, race, sex, and time in follow-up. In multivariate analyses, IDU was associated with decreased HAART receipt overall (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: [0.45-0.84] and OR = 0.58, 95% CI: [0.46-0.73], respectively for CCC and JHU) and less time on HAART at JHU (0.70, [0.55-0.88]), but not statistically associated with time on HAART at CCC (0.78, [0.56-1.09]). NIDU was independently associated with decreased HAART receipt (0.62, [0.47-0.81]) and less time on HAART (0.66, [0.52-0.85]) at CCC. These associations were not altered significantly whether patients at CCC were categorized according to historical drug use or drug use during the study period. Conclusions: Persons with IDU history from both clinic populations were less likely to receive HAART and tended to have less cumulative time on HAART. Effects of NIDU were similar to IDU at CCC. NIDU without IDU is an important contributor to HAART utilization. © 2011 McGowan et al

The relationship between injection and noninjection drug use and HIV disease progression

Background: Injection drug use is associated with poor HIV outcomes even among persons receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), but there are limited data on the relationship between noninjection drug use and HIV disease progression. Methods: We conducted an observational study of HIV-infected persons entering care between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2004, with follow-up through December 31, 2005. Results: There were 1,712 persons in the study cohort: 262 with a history of injection drug use, 785 with a history of noninjection drug use, and 665 with no history of drug use; 56% were White, and 24% were females. Median follow-up was 2.1 years, 33% had HAART prior to first visit, 40% initiated first HAART during the study period, and 306 (17.9%) had an AIDS-defining event or died. Adjusting for gender, age, race, prior antiretroviral use, CD4 cell count, and HIV-1 RNA, patients with a history of injection drug use were more likely to advance to AIDS or death than nonusers (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.43-2.70, p \u3c .01). There was no statistically significant difference of disease progression between noninjection drug users and nonusers (HR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.92-1.56, p = .19). An analysis among the subgroup who initiated their first HAART during the study period (n = 687) showed a similar pattern (injection drug users: HR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.09-3.06, p = .02; noninjection drug users: HR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.81-1.80, p = .35). Seventy-four patients had active injection drug use during the study period, 768 active noninjection drug use, and 870 no substance use. Analyses based on active drug use during the study period did not substantially differ from those based on history of drug use. Conclusions: This study shows no relationship between noninjection drug use and HIV disease progression. This study is limited by using history of drug use and combining different types of drugs. Further studies ascertaining specific type and extent of noninjection drug use prospectively, and with longer follow-up, are needed. © 2011 Elsevier Inc

Multivariate logistic regression models of predictors of (A) ever receiving HAART and (B) receiving HAART ≥95% of follow-up time in the Johns Hopkins University study cohort.

a<p>Among those ever exposed to HAART.</p>b<p>CD4⁺ T cell counts and plasma HIV-1 RNA levels not available for all persons; data shown are for those persons with data available. Baseline laboratory values are defined as the first values obtained on or after the initial office visit, between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2004.</p><p>HAART  =  highly active antiretroviral therapy; OR  =  odds ratio; CI  =  confidence interval; IDU  =  injection drug use.</p

Clinical and demographic characteristics of the Johns Hopkins University study cohort, total and according to IDU risk category.^a

a<p>Data are median (interquartile range) or n (%).</p>b<p>P-values are for comparisons between IDU and no IDU history groups using Wilcoxon rank-sum or Fisher's exact tests.</p>c<p>CD4⁺ T cell counts and plasma HIV-1 RNA levels not available for all persons; data shown are for those persons with data available. Baseline laboratory values defined as the first value obtained on or after the initial office visit, between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2004.</p>d<p>Defined as at least 7 days of continuous HAART.</p>e<p>Among persons ever exposed to HAART.</p><p>IDU  =  injection drug use; HAART  =  highly active antiretroviral therapy.</p