10 research outputs found
ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ² ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ
Π Π°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π·Π°Π΄Π°ΡΠ° ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ² ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ (ΠΠΠ) β ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ, ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΡ Π² ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΠΈ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ΅, Π²Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈ ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΅ Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΠΠ. ΠΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΠΠ ΠΏΠΎ Π½Π°Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π³Π»Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅Π±ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ, ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΌΡ Π»ΡΠ±Π°Ρ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ Π·Π°Π΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΊΠ° ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ° Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠΏΡΡΡΠΈΠΌΡ. ΠΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΡΠ²Π° Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ Π·Π°Π΄Π°ΡΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ Π±ΡΡΡ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ° Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ² ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π½Π΅ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΡΠΌ Π²ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΅ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΠΉΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² Π»ΠΈΠ±ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π²ΠΎΠ·Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Ρ ΠΈ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ. Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ² ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ. ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»Π°Π³Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΎΠ², ΠΏΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Ρ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ΅Π±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΡ
ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ΠΉ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. ΠΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΌ Π·Π°Π΄Π°ΡΠ° ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ, ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΠ°Ρ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΊΡ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½Π° Π·Π° ΡΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
, ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠ½ΠΎ-Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡ
Decrease of cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes: review of the common strategies and clinical studies
Military Medical Academy of S.M. Kirov, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Recent clinical trials about the cardiovascular safety of empagliflozin and liraglutide demonstrated a convincing lowering effect on mortality from cardiovascular causes among the patients with type 2 diabetes. These findings resulted in many questions about why this phenomenon was seen in two drugs with widely different mechanisms of functioning. It is important to note that the glucose-lowering effect was moderate, although a feature seen in both empagliflozin and liraglutide was their ability to increase insulin sensitivity. In many fundamental studies, this feature was associated with a reduction of cardiovascular risks. Insulin resistance, which has always been a pathophysiological base for the development of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes, is a topic for this report. Different methods to manage insulin resistance, including lifestyle changes, drug treatment and metabolic surgery, are discussed. Furthermore, the most common features of glucose-lowering drugs are analysed, including protective effects for cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes presented in randomised clinical trials. Studies include the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events (PROactive), Insulin Resistance Intervention After Stroke (IRIS), Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results (LEADER) and the Empagliflozin Cardiovascular Outcome Event Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients (EMPA-REG OUTCOME). The current study shows that the potential to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease is determined not only by effective lowering of glucose but also by the ability to lower insulin resistance, which causes a paradigm shift in the management of type 2 diabetes
ΠΡΠΈΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄Π½ΡΠ΅ Π°ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ±ΠΈΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡ ΡΠΏΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ Π·Π° ΡΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΡΠΎΡΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ² ΠΎΡΠ±ΠΈΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
Π Π°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π±Π°Π»Π»ΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ ΡΠΏΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·ΠΎΠ½Π΄ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΠ΅ΠΌΠ»ΠΈ. ΠΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΊ Π±Π°Π»Π»ΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΏΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ, ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠΊΠΎΠ», Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π·Π° ΡΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΊ Ρ ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Π³Π΅ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΈ Ρ ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠΌΠΈ Π½Π°ΠΊΠ»ΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π»ΠΎ ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ Π²Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π²ΡΠ΅Ρ
ΠΎΡΠ±ΠΈΡ. ΠΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡ Π·Π°Π΄Π°Ρ, ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΌ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎ ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΠΏΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ±ΠΈΡΠ°Ρ
ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΡΡ
Π²ΡΡΠΎΡ. ΠΠ»Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π°Π΄Π°ΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ΅Π±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΎΡΠ±ΠΈΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»Π°Π³Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄, Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ²ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π²ΡΡ
ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ±ΠΈΡ; ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ Π±Π°Π·ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΊΡΡΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ±ΠΈΡΡ; Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π±ΠΎΡ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
Π²Π°ΡΠΈΠ°Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΊΠ²Π°Π·ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Ρ
ΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ±ΠΈΡ; ΡΠΎΠ³Π»Π°ΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π° Π²Π΅ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ° Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊ ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΉ Π΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΌΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²Π°ΡΠΈΠ°Π½ΡΠ°, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΉ Π³Π°ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅Ρ Π·Π°Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠΈΠΊΠ»Π° Π·Π°ΠΌΡΠΊΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡ.
ΠΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»Π°Π³Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π° Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ² ΠΎΡΠ±ΠΈΡ, ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°Π²Π΅Π½ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΡΠΎΠΊ Π² Π·Π°Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ Π΄ΠΈΠ°ΠΏΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ½Π΅ Π²ΡΡΠΎΡ. ΠΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠ° Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠ° ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΊΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Ρ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ°Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅Ρ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ³Π½ΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠΊΠ»ΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ°Π΅ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡ ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ. Π₯Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ Π΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠ²Π°Π·ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Ρ
ΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ±ΠΈΡΡ, ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ· ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½Π° Π·Π°Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²Π°Π»Π΅. ΠΠ»Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΊ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΊΠΈ ΠΊ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΠΌ ΠΎΡΠ±ΠΈΡΡ, ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ· Π³ΡΠΈΠ½Π²ΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΎΡΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°Ρ.
ΠΠΏΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΌ, ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ·Π½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΡ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ, ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΒ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΎΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½ΠΎΡΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΊ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π²ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ³ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ.
ΠΠ½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π», ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠΌ, Π° ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π΅ΠΌΠ°Ρ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π·Π°Π΄Π°ΡΠ° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΡ ΠΊ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π·Π°Π΄Π°Ρ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΈΠ±Π΅ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ
SGLT2 inhibitors and kidneys: mechanisms and main effects in diabetes mellitus patients
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is the cause of the development of diabetic nephropathy β a complication that determines the high degree of disability and mortality of such patients. Until recently, approaches to normalizing glucose levels did not have a significant possibility of influencing the outcome of kidney damage in diabetes. Type 2 sodium glucose cotransporter inhibitors (SGLT2) are a new class of glucose-lowering drugs that improve glycemic control due to an insulin-independent mechanism of action associated with increased urinary glucose excretion. The review provides an analysis of the results of studies on the assessment of nephroprotective actions β one of the pleiotropic actions of this drugs group. These materials show the properties of SGLT2 inhibitors to reduce the risk of developing and the progression of albuminuria, to save glomerular filtration rate, to reduce the frequency of end-stage renal disease and the need for renal replacement therapy in patients with T2DM. The article gives and analyzes the currently existing hypotheses of the mechanism of action of these glucose-lowering drugs. The risk of the most common renal complications with the use of SGLT2 inhibitors is considered. The practical aspects of the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in modern algorithms for the care of patients with T2DM are indicated, as well as the prospects for new randomized clinical trials
Multiple effects of bariatric surgery on human biochemical status
Beneficial effect of bariatric surgery is expressed not only in reducing body weight, but also in improving the functioning of the body as a whole. On the one hand, numerous studies devoted to the investigations of specific mechanisms of the influence of bariatric surgery on the general condition of an organism testify to the enormous interest of scientists in this problem. On the other hand, the range of changes is so vast that it covers almost all physiological and biochemical processes. The most noticeable response to bariatric surgery is from the digestive (including the composition of the microbiota), immune (reducing the level of systemic and local inflammation), cardiovascular (reducing the risks of atherosclerosis and other diseases) systems. Partial or complete compensation of type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome also occurs. Among the variety of data, there is insufficient research on only standard biomarkers: leptin, C-reactive protein, interleukin 6, etc. A detailed study of the profiles of both circulating biomarkers and local ones is necessary. At the same time, it is obligate to continue to accumulate evidence on the positive effect of bariatric surgery, since this type of surgical intervention has come into practice relatively recently. Unfortunately, at the present time in Russia bariatric surgery is not an affordable and popular treatment for morbid obesity (MO). Nevertheless, it is extremely important to change the current situation, since bariatric treatment is an optimal and effective solution to socially significant diseases such as MO or type 2 diabetes mellitus
Omecamtiv mecarbil in chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, GALACTICβHF: baseline characteristics and comparison with contemporary clinical trials
Aims:
The safety and efficacy of the novel selective cardiac myosin activator, omecamtiv mecarbil, in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is tested in the Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac outcomes Through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure (GALACTICβHF) trial. Here we describe the baseline characteristics of participants in GALACTICβHF and how these compare with other contemporary trials.
Methods and Results:
Adults with established HFrEF, New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA)ββ₯βII, EF β€35%, elevated natriuretic peptides and either current hospitalization for HF or history of hospitalization/ emergency department visit for HF within a year were randomized to either placebo or omecamtiv mecarbil (pharmacokineticβguided dosing: 25, 37.5 or 50βmg bid). 8256 patients [male (79%), nonβwhite (22%), mean age 65βyears] were enrolled with a mean EF 27%, ischemic etiology in 54%, NYHA II 53% and III/IV 47%, and median NTβproBNP 1971βpg/mL. HF therapies at baseline were among the most effectively employed in contemporary HF trials. GALACTICβHF randomized patients representative of recent HF registries and trials with substantial numbers of patients also having characteristics understudied in previous trials including more from North America (n = 1386), enrolled as inpatients (n = 2084), systolic blood pressureβ<β100βmmHg (n = 1127), estimated glomerular filtration rate <β30βmL/min/1.73 m2 (n = 528), and treated with sacubitrilβvalsartan at baseline (n = 1594).
Conclusions:
GALACTICβHF enrolled a wellβtreated, highβrisk population from both inpatient and outpatient settings, which will provide a definitive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of this novel therapy, as well as informing its potential future implementation
Empagliflozin as a new management strategy on outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus have an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) complications. Although hyperglycaemia contributes to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and heart failure in these patients, glucose-lowering strategies did not have a significant effect on reducing CV risk, particularly in patients with a long duration of type 2 diabetes mellitus and prevalent CV disease (CVD). Sodium-glucose linked transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a new class of anti-hyperglycaemic medications that increase glycaemic control via insulin-dependent mechanism of action associated with increased urinary glucose excretion.
In this review, we present an analysis of the Empa-Reg Outcomes investigation, focussed on assessing the CV safety of empagliflozin, an inhibitor of SGLT2. We discuss the impressive results of trials that provide evidence on the cardiac and renal properties of empagliflozin. We present and analyse the current hypothesis on the mechanism of action of glucose-lowering medication, which has such a severe and complex impact on outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes at high CV risk
Possibilities of metabolic surgery for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients with grade 1 alimentary obesity
Many studies have demonstrated the high effectiveness of bariatric surgery in patients with grade 23 obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Currently, surgery is one of the most effective ways to decrease body mass, to maintain long-term weight loss and to manage type 2 diabetes mellitus. Particular interest has been generated by the strong influence of bariatric surgical interventions on the disruption of carbohydrate metabolism in patients who undergo surgery. This change leads to an improvement in the course of type 2 diabetes mellitus as well as its full remission. This review presents information on the mechanisms that are needed to improve glycaemic control in patients with obesity even after bariatric surgery. This review also contains a comparative analysis of how various surgical interventions influence the course of diabetes, the reasons for postbariatric glycaemia and predictors of the effectiveness of bariatric surgeries in terms of metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Until recently, the primary focus of the studies by bariatric surgeons was on patients with grade 23 obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, in this review, special attention is given to the patients with a body mass index that ranges from 30 to 35 kg/m. Gained experience of the bariatric surgeons leads to high effectiveness with respect to the influence on the course of diabetes in patients with grade 1 obesity, which allows us to significantly expand the range of patients who should be recommended for this surgery. In addition, some information concerning surgical and metabolic complications of bariatric surgical intervention is provided, which allows us to seriously consider this treatment
Atherosclerosis, Cardiovascular Disorders and COVID-19: Comorbid Pathogenesis
The article describes how atherosclerosis and coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) may affect each other. The features of this comorbid pathogenesis at various levels (vascular, cellular and molecular) are considered. A bidirectional influence of these conditions is described: the presence of cardiovascular diseases affects different individualsβ susceptibility to viral infection. In turn, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can have a negative effect on the endothelium and cardiomyocytes, causing blood clotting, secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and thus exacerbating the development of atherosclerosis. In addition to the established entry into cells via angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), other mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry are currently under investigation, for example, through CD147. Pathogenesis of comorbidity can be determined by the influence of the virus on various links which are meaningful for atherogenesis: generation of oxidized forms of low-density lipoproteins (LDL), launch of a cytokine storm, damage to the endothelial glycocalyx, and mitochondrial injury. The transformation of a stable plaque into an unstable one plays an important role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis complications and can be triggered by COVID-19. The impact of SARS-CoV-2 on large vessels such as the aorta is more complex than previously thought considering its impact on vasa vasorum. Current information on the mutual influence of the medicines used in the treatment of atherosclerosis and acute COVID-19 is briefly summarized
Cardiac myosin activation with omecamtiv mecarbil in systolic heart failure
BACKGROUND The selective cardiac myosin activator omecamtiv mecarbil has been shown to improve cardiac function in patients with heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction. Its effect on cardiovascular outcomes is unknown. METHODS We randomly assigned 8256 patients (inpatients and outpatients) with symptomatic chronic heart failure and an ejection fraction of 35% or less to receive omecamtiv mecarbil (using pharmacokinetic-guided doses of 25 mg, 37.5 mg, or 50 mg twice daily) or placebo, in addition to standard heart-failure therapy. The primary outcome was a composite of a first heart-failure event (hospitalization or urgent visit for heart failure) or death from cardiovascular causes. RESULTS During a median of 21.8 months, a primary-outcome event occurred in 1523 of 4120 patients (37.0%) in the omecamtiv mecarbil group and in 1607 of 4112 patients (39.1%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86 to 0.99; P = 0.03). A total of 808 patients (19.6%) and 798 patients (19.4%), respectively, died from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.11). There was no significant difference between groups in the change from baseline on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score. At week 24, the change from baseline for the median N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level was 10% lower in the omecamtiv mecarbil group than in the placebo group; the median cardiac troponin I level was 4 ng per liter higher. The frequency of cardiac ischemic and ventricular arrhythmia events was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection, those who received omecamtiv mecarbil had a lower incidence of a composite of a heart-failure event or death from cardiovascular causes than those who received placebo. (Funded by Amgen and others; GALACTIC-HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02929329; EudraCT number, 2016 -002299-28.)