Akibat Hukum Pelaksanaan Pengulangan Pemilukada Pati Berdasarkan Keputusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 82/PHPU.D-IX/2011

Direct elections is one step forward in realizing dilevel local democracy. But of course as a celebration of democracy, direct elections of local ditingkatan will face a very complicated issue, it happens when the political realities do not walk according to the substance and political ideals themselves. The fact is in accordance with the incidence of repetition Pati election by the Constitutional Court Decision No. 82/Phpu.D-Ix/2011. The issue that needs to be solved in this study is the What is the basic idea of repetition Election Starch Based Implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 82/PHPU.D-IX/2011, How to repeat execution Election Starch Based Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 82/PHPU.D- How IX/2011 and the impact of the Court's ruling on the issue 82/PHPU.D-IX/2011 No. repetition elections in Pati regency. Approach the problem in this research is empirical juridical. The required data are the primary data and data secunder. Data analysis method used in this study using the qualitative analysis method analyzes conducted to understand and structure the data has been obtained systematically in order to obtain an idea of the problem or situation under study. The results showed that the basic idea of the implementation of the election repetition Starch is the fault of the annulled Sunarwi Imam Suroso partner to advance the nomination of election Pati through the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle. In general, the implementation was satisfactory repeatability starch election although there still are a lot of weaknesses. Which has been caused by the impact of the elections including the elections positively Pati birthday July 26, 2012 is part of the process of political education that exist and run in Pati regency, while the negative impact of one of them is not a verdict for the repetition stage electoral process as a whole makes no the stage for the expectant couple Imam Suroso to conduct socialization opportunities that seem quite no justice

Pemberdayaan Lembaga Mediasi dalam Mengatasi Sengketa Pertanahan di Kabupaten Pati

Mediation land as part of an alternative dispute resolution through non-litigation have strategic positions. But the facts show Pati mediation of land in the district is not able to be maximized. Disputes in land in Pati regency from 2007 to 2011 a total of 39 cases consisted of ownership and control as many as 38 cases, the location of the land boundary disputes 1 case. The number of disputes as many as 39 cases were successfully resolved amicably as many as 13 cases (33%), while failing to (unsuccessfully) as many as 16 cases (67%). Departing from such conditions would no desire an empowerment to do so mediation can be accomplished with a maximum land. Issues that will be addressed in this study is whether the background Rear Mediation Needed Empowerment Land, whether that be the cause of empowerment of Land Mediation Maximum Yet the empowerment and how to model a more effective mediation to the parties that mediation can be actualized to the maximum land. The research method used was a qualitative approach, the type of descriptive analytical research and data sources used consisted of the primary data source and secondary data. The collection of primary data sources include interviews and observation. While the secondary data collection method is by collecting primary legal materials, legal materials and secondary legal materials tertiary. The method of analysis used was a qualitative analysis. The results describe that the mediation in dispute resolution in the areas of land need to be empowered as typologies or character of land disputes is always evolving as the dynamics of the community and efforts to reduce the burden of land cases in court. Some of the factors that are impeding problematic or can not be achieved to the maximum use of the mediation that is characteristic factors or root causes of disputes arising from the dispute in the land sector, internal and external factors of the parties to the dispute, the mediator factor that has not been empowered, facilities and infrastructure factors There are still minimal in institutions and others. The main element of the process of empowerment is giving authority and capacity development. These two elements can not be separated, because if the community has gained authority but does not yet have the capacity or authority to run the results are not optimal