25 research outputs found

    Descriptive statistics of study variables by childhood family settings.

    No full text
    <p>Descriptive statistics of study variables by childhood family settings.</p

    Unstandardized regression coefficients (B) and intercept for variables as predictor of general life satisfaction.

    No full text
    <p>Unstandardized regression coefficients (B) and intercept for variables as predictor of general life satisfaction.</p

    Growing up with a single mother and life satisfaction in adulthood: A test of mediating and moderating factors - Fig 1

    No full text
    <p>A. Association of general life satisfaction with childhood family settings across the adult life-span controlling for respondents’ sex and childhood SES. 1B. Association of adulthood life outcomes (adulthood SES, physical health, social integration, and romantic relationship success) with childhood family settings controlling for respondents’ sex, age, and childhood SES.</p

    Results of path model estimating indirect effects from childhood family settings to adult life-satisfaction via adulthood life circumstances.

    No full text
    <p>Indirect paths were estimated separately in individual models but illustrated here together in one model for presentational parsimony. All models controlled age, age2, age3, sex, and childhood SES. Values are unstandardized path coefficients with 95% confidence limits. Life satisfaction, occupational prestige and net income were standardized; employment status, physical health (number of doctor visits, reverse coded), number of friends, visits to/from family, partnership status, and having been divorced were centered.</p

    Sample characteristics and reliabilities, means, and standard deviations of study variables in both subsamples.

    No full text
    <p><i>Note</i>. <b><i>α</i></b> = Cronbach’s <b><i>α</i></b>.</p>a<p>comparison of mean values/frequencies between participants from the predominantly white American sample and the urban African American sample. Abbreviations: PSQI: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.</p>*<p><i>P</i><.05,</p>**<p><i>P</i><.01,</p>***<p><i>P</i><.001.</p

    Zero-order correlations between sleep indicators.

    No full text
    <p><i>Note</i>. Abbreviations: PSQI: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.</p>*<p><i>P</i><.05,</p>**<p><i>P</i><.01,</p>***<p><i>P</i><.001.</p

    OLS and FE models—SOEP.

    No full text
    OLS and FE models—SOEP.</p

    Appendix including all supporting information mentioned in the text.

    No full text
    The file includes S1 and S2 Figs as well as the S1 to S11 Tables which are mentioned in the text. (DOCX)</p

    Matching estimates for treatment effects–SOEP.

    No full text
    Matching estimates for treatment effects–SOEP.</p

    Means and standard errors for task performance for preterm children with birth weight ≤ 1500 g and > 1500 g, and full-term children in single-, dual-, and triple-task conditions.

    No full text
    <p>Measures were number of named animals (animals), recalled digits (digits), and how many times a button could be unfastened and fastened (button). Performance in the tray concurrent task was excluded from the figure as both groups showed no variance in this task. <i>P</i> values are presented for significant main effects of walking conditions (comparing single task vs. dual- and triple tasks) and for linear trends showing increasing gait performance from preterm children with birth weight ≤ 1500 g to preterm children with birth weight > 1500 g to full-term children. For statistical analyses log-transformed parameters of task performance were used.</p
    corecore