29 research outputs found
Entre lâEurope, la Russie et lâAsie : la place de la Tachkent impĂ©riale telle quâelle fut perçue par ses colons tsaristes
Les administrateurs tsaristes et les intellectuels qui arrivĂšrent peu de temps aprĂšs la conquĂȘte de Tachkent en 1865 sâĂ©tablirent dans de nouveaux « quartiers russes » censĂ©s servir dâexemple dâurbanisme moderne. La Tachkent russe devait ĂȘtre la vitrine dâune nation et dâun empire rĂ©novĂ©s aprĂšs les Grandes rĂ©formes et faire la dĂ©monstration de la supĂ©rioritĂ© des Russes dans la diffusion des idĂ©es europĂ©ennes en Asie. Les Russes privilĂ©giĂ©s de Tachkent durent faire face Ă la fois au scepticisme et Ă lâapprobation de la Russie europĂ©enne, ainsi quâaux dĂ©fis inĂ©dits Ă relever face Ă la population locale. Les colons russes les plus pauvres estompaient la frontiĂšre entre colonisateurs et colonisĂ©s et portaient clairement prĂ©judice Ă la nouvelle ville coloniale. Les administrateurs du tsar les accueillaient avec mĂ©pris car ils leur rappelaient avec un certain malaise combien la Russie avait encore de chemin Ă parcourir pour sâĂ©lever au rang de nation europĂ©enne et moderne. L'imbrication des problĂšmes de race, de genre ou de classe rendait de plus en plus confuse la dĂ©finition de caractĂ©ristiques ethniques strictes. Au lieu de la consolider, l'effort colonial rendit plus confuse la place de la Russie entre Europe et Asie dans lâesprit des Russes de Tachkent aussi bien que dans ceux des Russes de Russie.Tsarist administrators and intellectuals arriving shortly after Tashkentâs 1865 conquest created a new âRussian sectionâ to serve as an example of modern urban planning. Russian Tashkent would showcase a nation and empire renovated following the Great Reforms, and demonstrate the Russiansâ superior qualities in peacefully spreading European ideas to Asian lands. Privileged Tashkent Russians faced scepticism as well as approbation from central Russia, as well as unforeseen challenges from the local population. Poor Russian settlers blurred the boundary between colonizer and colonized and ostensibly sullied the streets of the new colonial city. Tsarist administrators greeted their presence with scorn, as uncomfortable reminders that the Russian nation still had some distance to travel to acquire status as modern and European. Issues of gender, race, class, and religion became intertwined in an atmosphere of growing confusion over fixed ethnic characteristics. In the end, the colonial endeavour complicated instead of solidified Russiaâs place between Europe and Asia in the minds of Tashkent and central Russians alike
Peasant settlers and the âcivilizing missionâ in Russian Turkestan, 1865-1917
This article provides an introduction to one of the lesser-known examples of European settler colonialism, the settlement of European (mainly Russian and Ukrainian) peasants in Southern Central Asia (Turkestan) in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. It establishes the legal background and demographic impact of peasant settlement, and the role played by the state in organising and encouraging it. It explores official attitudes towards the settlers (which were often very negative), and their relations with the local Kazakh and Kyrgyz population. The article adopts a comparative framework, looking at Turkestan alongside Algeria and Southern Africa, and seeking to establish whether paradigms developed in the study of other settler societies (such as the âpoor whiteâ) are of any relevance in understanding Slavic peasant settlement in Turkestan. It concludes that there are many close parallels with European settlement in other regions with large indigenous populations, but that racial ideology played a much less important role in the Russian case compared to religious divisions and fears of cultural backsliding. This did not prevent relations between settlers and the ânativeâ population deteriorating markedly in the years before the First World War, resulting in large-scale rebellion in 1916
Fictions nationales: Cinéma, empire et nation en Ouzbékistan (19191937). By Cloé Drieu. Turquie, Balkans, Asie centrale au prisme des sciences sociales. Paris: Editions Karthala, 2013. 392 pp. Appendixes. Notes. Bibliography. Glossary. Index. Illustrations. Tables. Paper.
To the Tashkent Station: Evacuation and Survival in the Soviet Union at War. By Rebecca Manley. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2009. xvi, 282 pp. Notes. Index. Photographs. Maps. $45.00, hard bound.
The New Woman in Uzbekistan: Islam, Modernity, and Unveiling under Communism. By Marianne Kamp. Jackson School Publications in International Studies. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2006. xiii, 332 pp. Notes. Bibliography. Glossary. Index. Illustrations. Photographs. $50.00, hard bound.
Black snouts go home! migration and race in late Soviet Leningrad and Moscow
Over the last decades of the Soviet Union, darker-skinned or darker-haired Soviet southern or eastern migrants in Leningrad, Moscow, and other Slavic cities became the target of ra
Weâre exceptional too! power, Peripheries, And imperia l connections patterns of empire viewed from russiaâs borderlands
Nomadism and Colonialism: A Hundred Years of Baluchistan, 1872â1972. By Fred Scholz. Translated by Hugh Van Skyhawk. Karachi: Oxford University Press, 2002. xviii, 328 pp. $35.00 (cloth).
Recommended from our members
Cholera and Colonialism in Central Asia: The Tashkent Riot of 1892
A cholera epidemic that swept through Central Asia in 1892 transformed visions and practices of empire in Tashkent. Tsarist officials hoped that recent medical advances would allow their new imperial possession to halt the diseaseâs spread to Europe from Asia. Success would restore a sense of Russian scientific and medical dominance, shaken by the local populationâs superiority in curing water-borne diseases. Execution of anticholera measures, however, altered a colonial relationship, provoking unrest among the local population. Russian settlers joined soldiers in brutally repressing a cholera riot sparked by numerous attacks on Central Asian culture. The aftermath of the riot altered images and relationships of class as well as race, and marked the end of Russian efforts, and tsarist confidence, to attack the cholera bacterium in Islamic portions of Central Asia, as part of their "civilizing mission.