17 research outputs found
Unadjusted and adjusted Prevalence Risk Ratios (PRRs) of factors associated with modern FP use (N = 1688).
<p>* Seventh Day Advent/Traditionist,</p><p><sup>¶</sup> Construction/Mechanic/Government/Clerical</p><p><sup>Δ</sup> Luweero /Mubende,</p><p><sup>††</sup> statistically significant at p<0.05,</p><p><sup>†</sup> Borderline significant at p<0.10.</p><p>Unadjusted and adjusted Prevalence Risk Ratios (PRRs) of factors associated with modern FP use (N = 1688).</p
Reasons for non-use of modern FP (N = 1093).
<p>Reasons for non-use of modern FP (N = 1093).</p
Unadjusted and adjusted Prevalence Risk Ratios (PRRs) of factors associated with modern FP knowledge (N = 1688).
<p>* Seventh Day Advent/Traditionist,</p><p><sup>¶</sup> Construction/Mechanic/Government/Clerical,</p><p><sup>††</sup> statistically significant at p<0.05,</p><p><sup>†</sup> Borderline significant at p<0.10.</p><p>Unadjusted and adjusted Prevalence Risk Ratios (PRRs) of factors associated with modern FP knowledge (N = 1688).</p
Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents by gender (N = 1688).
<p>*Seventh Day Advent/Traditionist,</p><p><sup>¶</sup>Construction/Mechanic/Government/Clerical, Δ Luweero /Mubende.</p><p>Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents by gender (N = 1688).</p
HIV incidence and sex at each study site.
<p>*Cases per 100 person-years (95% CI). Stratified by sex only when the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05)</p><p>For more details, see [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0134438#pone.0134438.ref015" target="_blank">15</a>]</p><p>HIV incidence and sex at each study site.</p
Demographic characteristics of the suspected transmitting partners of incident cases reported to be in HIV discordant couple relationships.
<p>* Data or sample not available from one or both volunteers</p><p>** Transmitting partner reports use of antiretroviral therapy, EDI: Estimated date of infection in the incident case</p><p>°An additional 6 volunteers reported being on ART at or around the time of the transmission event, however their viral load was too low to sequence for linkage analysis</p><p><sup>▪</sup> Comparing linked vs. unlinked across volunteer characteristic</p><p><sup>▪▪</sup> Divorced, separated or widowed</p><p>Demographic characteristics of the suspected transmitting partners of incident cases reported to be in HIV discordant couple relationships.</p
First available CD4 count in 272 linked transmitting partners following HIV transmission. Vertical dashed line shows the analysis cut point of 90 days post EDI.
<p>First available CD4 count in 272 linked transmitting partners following HIV transmission. Vertical dashed line shows the analysis cut point of 90 days post EDI.</p
Polychromatic flow cytometry of GRIN-specific T cells.
a<p>All samples at baseline,</p>b<p>Samples at 2 weeks post second vaccination,</p>c<p>Frequency of positive cells.</p
IFN-γ ELISPOT Response Magnitude (SFC/10<sup>6</sup> PBMC) and Responder Rate (%) to Any HIV Antigen by Time Post Vaccination (X-axis) and Dose Groups.
<p>Gray dots: response below the cut-off to any of the 6 peptide pools; red dots: response above the cut-off to any of the 6 peptide pools. For the vaccine groups, the overlaid box plot summarizes the positive responses (i.e., the median, 1<sup>st</sup> and 3<sup>rd</sup> quartiles and minimum/maximum). For the baseline (BL) and placebo (Pbo) group, the box plot summarizes the negative responses and the red dot displays the single positive response at baseline.</p
Polychromatic flow cytometry of Env-specific T cells.
a<p>All samples at baseline,</p>b<p>Samples at 2 weeks post second vaccination,</p>c<p>Frequency of positive cells.</p