Unadjusted and adjusted Prevalence Risk Ratios (PRRs) of factors associated with modern FP use (N = 1688).

<p>* Seventh Day Advent/Traditionist,</p><p>^¶ Construction/Mechanic/Government/Clerical</p><p>^Δ Luweero /Mubende,</p><p>^†† statistically significant at p<0.05,</p><p>^† Borderline significant at p<0.10.</p><p>Unadjusted and adjusted Prevalence Risk Ratios (PRRs) of factors associated with modern FP use (N = 1688).</p

Reasons for non-use of modern FP (N = 1093).

<p>Reasons for non-use of modern FP (N = 1093).</p

Unadjusted and adjusted Prevalence Risk Ratios (PRRs) of factors associated with modern FP knowledge (N = 1688).

<p>* Seventh Day Advent/Traditionist,</p><p>^¶ Construction/Mechanic/Government/Clerical,</p><p>^†† statistically significant at p<0.05,</p><p>^† Borderline significant at p<0.10.</p><p>Unadjusted and adjusted Prevalence Risk Ratios (PRRs) of factors associated with modern FP knowledge (N = 1688).</p

Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents by gender (N = 1688).

<p>*Seventh Day Advent/Traditionist,</p><p>^¶Construction/Mechanic/Government/Clerical, Δ Luweero /Mubende.</p><p>Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents by gender (N = 1688).</p

HIV incidence and sex at each study site.

<p>*Cases per 100 person-years (95% CI). Stratified by sex only when the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05)</p><p>For more details, see [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0134438#pone.0134438.ref015" target="_blank">15</a>]</p><p>HIV incidence and sex at each study site.</p

Demographic characteristics of the suspected transmitting partners of incident cases reported to be in HIV discordant couple relationships.

<p>* Data or sample not available from one or both volunteers</p><p>** Transmitting partner reports use of antiretroviral therapy, EDI: Estimated date of infection in the incident case</p><p>°An additional 6 volunteers reported being on ART at or around the time of the transmission event, however their viral load was too low to sequence for linkage analysis</p><p>^▪ Comparing linked vs. unlinked across volunteer characteristic</p><p>^▪▪ Divorced, separated or widowed</p><p>Demographic characteristics of the suspected transmitting partners of incident cases reported to be in HIV discordant couple relationships.</p

First available CD4 count in 272 linked transmitting partners following HIV transmission. Vertical dashed line shows the analysis cut point of 90 days post EDI.

<p>First available CD4 count in 272 linked transmitting partners following HIV transmission. Vertical dashed line shows the analysis cut point of 90 days post EDI.</p

Polychromatic flow cytometry of GRIN-specific T cells.

a<p>All samples at baseline,</p>b<p>Samples at 2 weeks post second vaccination,</p>c<p>Frequency of positive cells.</p

IFN-γ ELISPOT Response Magnitude (SFC/10⁶ PBMC) and Responder Rate (%) to Any HIV Antigen by Time Post Vaccination (X-axis) and Dose Groups.

<p>Gray dots: response below the cut-off to any of the 6 peptide pools; red dots: response above the cut-off to any of the 6 peptide pools. For the vaccine groups, the overlaid box plot summarizes the positive responses (i.e., the median, 1^st and 3^rd quartiles and minimum/maximum). For the baseline (BL) and placebo (Pbo) group, the box plot summarizes the negative responses and the red dot displays the single positive response at baseline.</p

Polychromatic flow cytometry of Env-specific T cells.

a<p>All samples at baseline,</p>b<p>Samples at 2 weeks post second vaccination,</p>c<p>Frequency of positive cells.</p