Comparative characteristics of some methods for estimating energy expenditure in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients

Aim: To compare the energy expenditure (EE) assessed by ventilator-derived carbon dioxide production (EE–VCO2-ventilator) and the energy expenditure calculated from six predictive equations with the gold standard energy expenditure measured with indirect calorimetry (IC) in mechanically ventilated patients. Materials and methods: This is a prospective, non-randomized, one-month study which included six mechanically ventilated patients with FiO2 <60% and PEEP <10 mbar. Thirty-minute measurements were taken using a Cosmed Q-NRG+ metabolic monitor. The average ventilator-derived VCO2 from the Drager Evita Infinity V500 respirator (VʹCO2, ml/min) was calculated for the same period. The IC-measured EE (MEE-IC) was compared with EE–VCO2-ventilator by a formula proposed in ESPEN (8.19×VCO2) and with six predictive equations. Results: Mean MEE-IC was 1650±365 kcal. Mean measured EE–VCO2-ventilator was 1669±340 kcal. A statistically nonsignificant difference was found between the two measurements (p=0.84, correlation coefficient 0.98). Of the predictive equations we compared, the best correlation to the reference method was the Penn State 3 with mean EE of 1679±356 (p=0.81, correlation coefficient of 0.78). Conclusions: In critically ill mechanically ventilated patients, the assessment of EE based on a ventilator-derived VCO2 is an alternative to IC and is more accurate than most predictive equations

Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome Type IV - Anaesthetic Considerations

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) is a rare disorder that occurs due to genetic defect in the collagen synthesis. The vascular subtype of EDS (type IV) is defined by characteristic facial features, translucent skin, easy bruising, and spontaneous arterial rupture and visceral perforation of such organs as the uterus and intestines, with possible life-threatening consequences. We report a case of a 15-year-old male patient with no past medical history undergoing emergency laparotomy after a spontaneous sigmoid colon perforation. Post-operatively and during the ICU stay complications developed and several revision operations and invasive procedures were necessary. A chest CT angiography revealed a right subclavian artery aneurysm, which was treated by an endovascular stent grafting. Taking into consideration the family history and clinical presentation EDS type IV was discussed as a possible cause of the patient’s condition. DNA analysis confirmed the diagnosis. Due to the lack of evidence-based recommendations the anaesthetic management of these patients is still challenging

Surgical treatment of pneumothorax in patients with COVID-19 – results and management

Introduction: The new coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, provokes infection with different clinical presentation. It involves an asymptomatic condition, mild variants with fever and dry cough to severe pneumonia, adynamia and respiratory failure with lethal outcome. The fibrotic lung tissue after the inflammatory process is a background for development of a secondary pneumothorax. Although it rarely causes lethal outcomes in COVID-19 patients, pneumothorax requires early diagnosis and adequate treatment to prevent any complications and decrease mortality rate.Aim: The aim of this study was to analyse the results of surgical treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients with pneumothorax in terms of demographic data, concomitant diseases, complications, and outcome.Materials and methods: Longitudinal prospective study was carried out with 26 patients with pneumothorax as a result of SARS-CoV-2 infection. They were treated at the Intensive Care Unit of the Infectious Disease Clinic and at the Second Clinic of Surgery, St George University Hospital in Plovdiv over a 6-month period from September 2020 to February 2021.Results: Seventeen of the patients were men and nine – women. Twenty-four of all patients underwent thoracentesis and two of them had a video-assisted thoracoscopy. The mean age of the studied patients with pneumothorax and COVID-19 was 66.77±12.61 years, which shows that it is the patients of advanced age with concomitant diseases that are at a higher risk of serious complications and adverse outcome. Of the hospitalized 1245 patients with COVID-19, 385 (30.92%) passed away. Of all hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2, 26 (2.08%) developed pneumothorax. Sixteen of them (62%) passed away. The possibility of a lethal outcome for intubated patients increased more than twice.Conclusions: The pneumothorax as a complication of COVID-19 carries high mortality and severely worsens the prognosis for these patients

Effect of a Recombinant Human Soluble Thrombomodulin on Mortality in Patients With Sepsis-Associated Coagulopathy The SCARLET Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance: Previous research suggested that soluble human recombinant thrombomodulin may reduce mortality among patients with sepsis-associated coagulopathy. Objective: To determine the effect of human recombinant thrombomodulin vs placebo on 28-day all-cause mortality among patients with sepsis-associated coagulopathy. Design, Setting, and Participants: The SCARLET trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational, multicenter phase 3 study conducted in intensive care units at 159 sites in 26 countries. All adult patients admitted to one of the participating intensive care units between October 2012 and March 2018 with sepsis-associated coagulopathy and concomitant cardiovascular and/or respiratory failure, defined as an international normalized ratio greater than 1.40 without other known etiology and a platelet count in the range of 30 to 150 × 10 9/L or a greater than 30% decrease in platelet count within 24 hours, were considered for inclusion. The final date of follow-up was February 28, 2019. Interventions: Patients with sepsis-associated coagulopathy were randomized and treated with an intravenous bolus or a 15-minute infusion of thrombomodulin (0.06 mg/kg/d [maximum, 6 mg/d]; n = 395) or matching placebo (n = 405) once daily for 6 days. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary end point was 28-day all-cause mortality. Results: Among 816 randomized patients, 800 (mean age, 60.7 years; 437 [54.6%] men) completed the study and were included in the full analysis set. In these patients, the 28-day all-cause mortality rate was not statistically significantly different between the thrombomodulin group and the placebo group (106 of 395 patients [26.8%] vs 119 of 405 patients [29.4%], respectively; P =.32). The absolute risk difference was 2.55% (95% CI, -3.68% to 8.77%). The incidence of serious major bleeding adverse events (defined as any intracranial hemorrhage; life-threatening bleeding; or bleeding event classified as serious by the investigator, with administration of at least 1440 mL [typically 6 units] of packed red blood cells over 2 consecutive days) was 23 of 396 patients (5.8%) in the thrombomodulin group and 16 of 404 (4.0%) in the placebo group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with sepsis-associated coagulopathy, administration of a human recombinant thrombomodulin, compared with placebo, did not significantly reduce 28-day all-cause mortality. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01598831

Effect of a Recombinant Human Soluble Thrombomodulin on Mortality in Patients With Sepsis-Associated Coagulopathy The SCARLET Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance: Previous research suggested that soluble human recombinant thrombomodulin may reduce mortality among patients with sepsis-associated coagulopathy. Objective: To determine the effect of human recombinant thrombomodulin vs placebo on 28-day all-cause mortality among patients with sepsis-associated coagulopathy. Design, Setting, and Participants: The SCARLET trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational, multicenter phase 3 study conducted in intensive care units at 159 sites in 26 countries. All adult patients admitted to one of the participating intensive care units between October 2012 and March 2018 with sepsis-associated coagulopathy and concomitant cardiovascular and/or respiratory failure, defined as an international normalized ratio greater than 1.40 without other known etiology and a platelet count in the range of 30 to 150 × 10 9/L or a greater than 30% decrease in platelet count within 24 hours, were considered for inclusion. The final date of follow-up was February 28, 2019. Interventions: Patients with sepsis-associated coagulopathy were randomized and treated with an intravenous bolus or a 15-minute infusion of thrombomodulin (0.06 mg/kg/d [maximum, 6 mg/d]; n = 395) or matching placebo (n = 405) once daily for 6 days. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary end point was 28-day all-cause mortality. Results: Among 816 randomized patients, 800 (mean age, 60.7 years; 437 [54.6%] men) completed the study and were included in the full analysis set. In these patients, the 28-day all-cause mortality rate was not statistically significantly different between the thrombomodulin group and the placebo group (106 of 395 patients [26.8%] vs 119 of 405 patients [29.4%], respectively; P =.32). The absolute risk difference was 2.55% (95% CI, -3.68% to 8.77%). The incidence of serious major bleeding adverse events (defined as any intracranial hemorrhage; life-threatening bleeding; or bleeding event classified as serious by the investigator, with administration of at least 1440 mL [typically 6 units] of packed red blood cells over 2 consecutive days) was 23 of 396 patients (5.8%) in the thrombomodulin group and 16 of 404 (4.0%) in the placebo group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with sepsis-associated coagulopathy, administration of a human recombinant thrombomodulin, compared with placebo, did not significantly reduce 28-day all-cause mortality. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01598831

Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in hospitalised medically ill patients The ENDORSE Global Survey

Limited data are available regarding the risk for venous thromboembolism (VIE) and VIE prophylaxis use in hospitalised medically ill patients. We analysed data from the global ENDORSE survey to evaluate VTE risk and prophylaxis use in this population according to diagnosis, baseline characteristics, and country. Data on patient characteristics, VIE risk, and prophylaxis use were abstracted from hospital charts. VTE risk and prophylaxis use were evaluated according to the 2004 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify factors associated with use of ACCP-recommended prophylaxis. Data were evaluated for 37,356 hospitalised medical patients across 32 countries. VIE risk varied according to medical diagnosis, from 31.2% of patients with gastrointestinal/hepatobiliary diseases to 100% of patients with acute heart failure, active noninfectious respiratory disease, or pulmonary infection (global rate, 41.5%). Among those at risk for VTE, ACCP-recommended prophylaxis was used in 24.4% haemorrhagic stroke patients and 40-45% of cardiopulmonary disease patients (global rate, 39.5%). Large differences in prophylaxis use were observed among countries. Markers of disease severity, including central venous catheters, mechanical ventilation, and admission to intensive care units, were strongly associated with use of ACCP-recommended prophylaxis. In conclusion, VIE risk varies according to medical diagnosis. Less than 40% of at-risk hospitalised medical patients receive ACCP-recommended prophylaxis. Prophylaxis use appears to be associated with disease severity rather than medical diagnosis. These data support the necessity to improve implementation of available guidelines for evaluating VIE risk and providing prophylaxis to hospitalised medical patients

Venous Thromboembolism Risk and Prophylaxis in the Acute Care Hospital Setting (ENDORSE Survey) Findings in Surgical Patients

Objective: To evaluate venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk in patients who underwent a major operation, including the use of, and factors influencing, American College of Chest Physicians-recommended types of VTE prophylaxis