A systematic evidence map of intervention evaluations to reduce gang-related violence

Objective: To identify and map evaluations of interventions on gang violence using innovative systematic review methods to inform future research needs. Methods: A previous iteration of this map (Hodgkinson et al., (2009). “Reducing gang-related crime: A systematic review of ‘comprehensive’ interventions.”) was updated in 2021/22 with inclusion of evaluations since the original searches in 2006. Innovative automatic searching and screening was used concurrently with a ‘conventional’ strategy that utilised 58 databases and other online resources. Data were presented in an online interactive evidence gap map. Results: Two hundred and forty-eight evaluations were described, including 114 controlled studies, characterised as comprehensive interventions, encompassing more than one distinct type of intervention. Conclusion: This suggests a substantial body of previously unidentified robust evidence on interventions that could be synthesised to inform policy and practice decision-making. Further research is needed to investigate the extent to which using automated methodologies can improve the efficiency and quality of systematic reviews

What helps to support people affected by Adverse Childhood Experiences? A review of evidence

Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) include physical, sexual or emotional abuse; neglect; domestic violence in the home; homelessness or living in care; parental mental health problems or substance abuse; and parents who are absent through imprisonment, separation or death. We sought to understand how people affected by ACEs can best be supported by conducting a review of evidence. The review involved three components: a qualitative synthesis of UK views studies; a systematic review of reviews which measured the effectiveness of interventions to support people affected by ACEs; and a stakeholder workshop with young people with lived experience of ACEs. The review was commissioned by the Department of Health and Social Care

How Do Contextual Factors Influence Implementation and Receipt of Positive Youth Development Programs Addressing Substance Use and Violence? A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis of Process Evaluations

Objective:Positive youth development (PYD) often aims to prevent tobacco, alcohol, and drugs use and violence. We systematically reviewed PYD interventions, synthesizing process, and outcomes evidence. Synthesis of outcomes, published elsewhere, found no overall evidence of reducing substance use or violence but notable variability of fidelity. Our synthesis of process evaluations examined how implementation varied and was influenced by context.Data Source:Process evaluations of PYD aiming to reduce substance use and violence.Study Inclusion Criteria:Overall review published since 1985; written in English; focused on youth aged 11 to 18 years; focused on interventions addressing multiple positive assets; reported on theory, process, or outcomes; and concerned with reducing substance use or violence. Synthesis of process evaluations examined how implementation varies with or is influenced by context.Data Extraction:Two reviewers in parallel.Data Synthesis:Thematic synthesis.Results:We identified 12 reports. Community engagement enhanced program appeal. Collaboration with other agencies could broaden the activities offered. Calm but authoritative staff increased acceptability. Staff continuity underpinned diverse activities and durable relationships. Empowering participants were sometimes in tension with requiring them to engage in diverse activities.Conclusion:Our systematic review identified factors that might help improve the fidelity and acceptability of PYD interventions. Addressing these might enable PYD to fulfill its potential as a means of promoting health

A cross sectional study of water quality from dental unit water lines in dental practices in the West of Scotland

OBJECTIVE: To determine the microbiological quality of water from dental units in a general practice setting and current practice for disinfection of units. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study of the water quality from 40 dental units in 39 general practices and a questionnaire of the disinfection protocols used in those practices. SETTING: NHS practices in primarydental care. SUBJECTS: Thirty-nine general practices from the West of Scotland. METHODS: Water samples were collected on two separate occasions from dental units and analysed for microbiological quality by the total viable count (TVC) method. Water specimens were collected from the triple syringe, high speed outlet, cup filler and surgery tap. Each participating practitioner was asked to complete a questionnaire. Results Microbial contamination was highest from the high speed outlet followed by the triple syringe and cup filler. On average, the TVC counts from the high speed water lines at 37 degrees C and for the high speed lines, triple syringe and cup filler at 22 degrees C were significantly higher than that from the control tap water specimens. The study included units from 11 different manufacturers with ages ranging from under one year to over eight years. The age of the dental unit analysed did not appear to influence the level of microbial contamination. Five of the practices surveyed used disinfectants to clean the dental units but these had no significant effect on the microbiological quality of the water. The majority of dental units (25 out of 40) were never flushed with water between patients. A number of different non-sterile irrigants were used for surgical procedures. CONCLUSION: The microbiological quality of water from dental units in general dental practice is poor compared with that from drinking water sources. Suitable sterile irrigants should be used for surgical procedures in dental practice. Further work is required for pragmatic decontamination regimens of dental unit water lines in a general dental practice setting

Depression, anxiety, pain and quality of life in people living with chronic hepatitis C: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives: Individuals infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) can develop extrahepatic conditions which may have a significant impact on life expectancy and quality of life. We conducted a systematic review to assess the causal relationship between HCV and extrahepatic conditions and the impact of HCV upon health-related quality of life of people in the UK. / Methods: HCV advocacy groups identified conditions that they thought most important to research, and the perspectives of various stakeholders informed the scope of the review. A comprehensive literature search of a range of electronic databases and websites was undertaken. Screening, quality assessment and data extraction were conducted using specialist software. The key criterion for inclusion in a synthesis was a study’s testing of the association between HCV and either quality of life or conditions specified as important by advocacy groups: depression, anxiety or painful conditions. Other criteria relating to study populations, measures and matching of study groups were also applied. Two reviewers assessed included studies, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer where necessary. Studies were assessed for methodological quality using standardised appraisal tools. Metaanalyses were performed. Based on the consistency and sufficiency of research evidence, the findings were graded as strong, promising, tentative or inconclusive. / Results: 71 studies were included in the review’s syntheses. All studies were judged to be at a moderate or high risk of bias. Only two UK studies met our inclusion criteria. / Quality of life: Evidence from 22 studies indicates that people with HCV have worse quality of life than ‘general’ or ‘healthy’ populations; meta-analysis of nine studies indicated\ud that the physical (PCS) and mental health (MCS) domains of quality of life on the Health-Related Quality of Life Scale were both statistically and clinically worse among HCV-infected people (PCS: MD 5.54, 95% CI 3.73-7.35, MCS: MD 3.81, 95% CI 1.97-5.64). Evidence from seven included studies suggests that people co-infected with HCV and HIV have worse quality of life than individuals with HIV only; metaanalysis of five studies indicated that both the physical and mental health domains of quality of life were significantly worse among people who were co-infected (PCS: MD 2.57, 95% CI 1.08-4.06, MCS: MD 1.88, 95% CI 0.06-3.69). / Depression and anxiety: Evidence from 22 studies indicates that depression and anxiety are more severe, and depression is more common among people with HCV compared to those without it. Meta-analysis of 12 studies identified the severity of depression in people with HCV to be significantly greater than in those without HCV (Mean difference 0.98, 95% CI 0.43-1.53). Meta-analysis of nine studies identified the severity of clinical anxiety to be significantly greater among people with HCV (Mean difference 0.47, 95% CI 0.09-0.86). Meta-analysis of seven studies identified participants with HCV to be approximately three times more likely to be depressed compared to those without HCV (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.62-4.74). No statistically significant evidence that anxiety is more common among people with HCV was found. / Pain: Evidence was appraised from 26 studies on painful conditions. A meta-analysis of four studies indicates that people with HCV are 17% more likely to suffer from arthralgia than those without HCV (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04-1.31). A meta-analysis of five studies suggested that people with HCV are significantly more likely to suffer from fibromyalgia; key differences across the studies in terms of the health status (co-morbidities) of HCV patients and comparison groups mean it is not possible to quantify the increased risk attributable to HCV. Other studies, including those on arthritis, were not amenable to meta-analysis. / Conclusions: Evidence suggests an association between HCV infection and depression, anxiety, fibromyalgia, arthralgia and health-related quality of life. However, the evidence was graded as ‘promising’ or ‘tentative’ rather than ‘strong’. More high-quality research on the association between HCV and these conditions is needed

Health system barriers to strengthening vaccine-preventable disease surveillance and response in the context of decentralization: evidence from Georgia

BACKGROUND: A critical challenge in the health sector in developing countries is to ensure the quality and effectiveness of surveillance and public health response in an environment of decentralization. In Georgia, a country where there has been extensive decentralization of public health responsibilities over the last decade, an intervention was recently piloted to strengthen district-level local vaccine-preventable disease surveillance and response activities through improved capacity to analyze and use routinely collected data. The purpose of the study is 1) to assess the effectiveness of the intervention on motivation and perceived capacity to analyze and use information at the district-level, and 2) to assess the role that individual- and system-level factors play in influencing the effectiveness of the intervention. METHODS: A pre-post quasi-experimental research design is used for the quantitative evaluation. Data come from a baseline and two follow-up surveys of district-level health staff in 12 intervention and 3 control Center of Public Health (CPH) offices. These data were supplemented by record reviews in CPH offices as well as focus group discussions among CPH and health facility staff. RESULTS: The results of the study suggest that a number of expected improvements in perceived data availability and analysis occurred following the implementation of the intervention package, and that these improvements in analysis could be attributable to the intervention package. However, the study results also suggest that there exist several health systems barriers that constrained the effectiveness of the intervention in influencing the availability of data, analysis and response. CONCLUSION: To strengthen surveillance and response systems in Georgia, as well as in other countries, donor, governments, and other stakeholders should consider how health systems factors influence investments to improve the availability of data, analysis, and response. Linking the intervention to broader health sector reforms in management processes and organizational culture will be critical to ensure that efforts designed to promote evidence-based decision-making are successful, especially as they are scaled up to the national level