Monocytes Contribute to Differential Immune Pressure on R5 versus X4 HIV through the Adipocytokine Visfatin/NAMPT

Background: The immune system exerts a diversifying selection pressure on HIV through cellular, humoral and innate mechanisms. This pressure drives viral evolution throughout infection. A better understanding of the natural immune pressure on the virus during infection is warranted, given the clinical interest in eliciting and sustaining an immune response to HIV which can help to control the infection. We undertook to evaluate the potential of the novel HIV-induced, monocyte-derived factor visfatin to modulate viral infection, as part of the innate immune pressure on viral populations. Results: We show that visfatin is capable of selectively inhibiting infection by R5 HIV strains in macrophages and resting PBMC in vitro, while at the same time remaining indifferent to or even favouring infection by X4 strains. Furthermore, visfatin exerts a direct effect on the relative fitness of R5 versus X4 infections in a viral competition setup. Direct interaction of visfatin with the CCR5 receptor is proposed as a putative mechanism for this differential effect. Possible in vivo relevance of visfatin induction is illustrated by its association with the dominance of CXCR4-using HIV in the plasma. Conclusions: As an innate factor produced by monocytes, visfatin is capable of inhibiting infections by R5 but not X4 strains, reflecting a potential selective pressure against R5 viruses. © 2012 Van den Bergh et al.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Increased visfatin in hemodialysis patients is associated with decreased demands for recombinant human erythropoietin

Background: Studies detected an association between visfatin and markers of iron metabolism in patients with insulin resistance. In this study, such a relation was evaluated in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Also relations between visfatin and hepcidin, demands for recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo), inflammation, and situations characterized by insulin resistance were evaluated. Methods: After a four-week washout period from iron treatment, 33 HD patients and 20 healthy volunteers enrolled in the study. Serum visfatin, hepcidin, and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were assessed by means of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Hemoglobin, serum iron, ferritin, and transferrin saturation (TSAT) were also measured. Results: Visfatin was markedly increased in HD patients. Visfatin levels did not differ between diabetics and non-diabetics. No relation was detected between visfatin and body mass index or IL-6 in HD patients. From the markers of iron metabolism, the hepcidin included, visfatin was related only to TSAT. A strong positive relation was revealed between visfatin and hemoglobin, whereas visfatin was inversely related to rHuEpo dose. Resistance to rHuEpo index was inversely and independently of TSAT related to visfatin. Conclusion: Visfatin is increased in HD patients and it is associated with decreased demands for rHuEpo