Task-Dependent Interaction between Parietal and Contralateral Primary Motor Cortex during Explicit versus Implicit Motor Imagery

Both mental rotation (MR) and motor imagery (MI) involve an internalization of movement within motor and parietal cortex. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) techniques allow for a task-dependent investigation of the interhemispheric interaction between these areas. We used image-guided dual-coil TMS to investigate interactions between right inferior parietal lobe (rIPL) and left primary motor cortex (M1) in 11 healthy participants. They performed MI (right index-thumb pinching in time with a 1 Hz metronome) or hand MR tasks, while motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from right first dorsal interosseous. At rest, rIPL conditioning 6 ms prior to M1 stimulation facilitated MEPs in all participants, whereas this facilitation was abolished during MR. While rIPL conditioning 12 ms prior to M1 stimulation had no effect on MEPs at rest, it suppressed corticomotor excitability during MI. These results support the idea that rIPL forms part of a distinct inhibitory network that may prevent unwanted movement during imagery tasks

The contribution of neurophysiology in the diagnosis and management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a review

Study design: Topical review of the literature. Objective: The objective of this review article was to assess indications and usefulness of various neurophysiological techniques in diagnosis and management of cervical spondylogenic myelopathy (CSM). Methods: The MEDLINE, accessed by Pubmed and EMBASE electronic databases, was searched using the medical subject headings: 'compressive myelopathy', 'cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM)', 'cervical spondylogenic myelopathy', 'motor evoked potentials (MEPs)', 'transcranial magnetic stimulation', 'somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs)', 'electromyography (EMG)', 'nerve conduction studies (NCS)' and 'cutaneous silent period (CSP)'. Results: SEPs and MEPs recording can usefully supplement clinical examination and neuroimaging findings in assessing the spinal cord injury level and severity. Segmental cervical cord dysfunction can be revealed by an abnormal spinal N13 response, whereas the P14 potential is a reliable marker of dorsal column impairment. MEPs may also help in the differential diagnosis between spinal cord compression and neurodegenerative disorders. SEPs and MEPs are also useful in follow-up evaluation of sensory and motor function during surgical treatment and rehabilitation. EMG and NCS improve the sensitivity of cervical radiculopathy detection and may help rule out peripheral nerve problems that can cause symptoms that are similar to those of CSM. CSP also shows a high sensitivity for detecting CSM. Conclusion: Neuroimaging, especially magnetic resonance imaging, represents the procedure of choice for the diagnosis of CSM, but a correct interpretation of morphological findings can be achieved only if they are correlated with functional data. The studies reported in this review highlight the crucial role of the electrophysiological studies in diagnosis and management of CSM

Central motor conduction studies in patients with spinal cord disorders: a review.

Study design:Topical review of the literature.Objectives:The evaluation of patients with myelopathies requires radiological investigations; however, for the correct interpretation of the neuroimaging findings, the functional assessment of corticospinal conduction is helpful or even mandatory in many conditions. The objective of this review article was to assess the utility of the motor evoked potentials ( MEPs) in diagnosis and management of the most frequent spinal cord disorders.Setting:Salzburg ( Austria) and Merano ( Italy).Methods:A MEDLINE search was performed using following terms: 'motor evoked potentials', 'transcranial magnetic stimulation', 'central motor conduction', 'compressive myelopathy', 'spinal cord infarction', 'spinal cord injury', 'syringomyelia', 'myelitis', 'hereditary spastic paraparesis', 'subacute combined degeneration' and 'hepatic myelopathy'.Results:Central motor conduction abnormalities can be detected also in the absence of neuroradiological abnormalities-for example, in patients with subacute combined degeneration or hepatic myelopathy. In the most frequent patients with compressive myelopathies, MEPs were found to be very helpful in determining the functional significance of neuroimaging findings. MEP recording can supplement clinical examination and neuroimaging findings also in the assessment of the spinal cord injury level. In patients with spinal cord infarction, the MEP study can demonstrate spinal involvement even when radiological evidence for spinal cord damage is absent or equivocal, thus allowing an important early diagnosis.Conclusion:MEPs represent a highly sensitive and accurate diagnostic tool in many different spinal cord disorders. MEPs can also be useful in follow-up evaluation of motor function during treatment and rehabilitation