20 research outputs found

    A review of the psychological and familial perspectives of childhood obesity

    Get PDF

    Preventing childhood obesity during infancy in UK primary care: a mixed-methods study of HCPs' knowledge, beliefs and practice

    Get PDF
    Background: There is a strong rationale for intervening in early childhood to prevent obesity. Over a quarter of infants gain weight more rapidly than desirable during the first six months of life putting them at greater risk of obesity in childhood. However, little is known about UK healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) approach to primary prevention. This study explored obesity-related knowledge of UK HCPs and the beliefs and current practice of general practitioners (GPs)and practice nurses in relation to identifying infants at risk of developing childhood obesity. Method: Survey of UK HCPs (GPs, practice nurses, health visitors, nursery, community and children’s nurses). HCPs (n = 116) rated their confidence in providing infant feeding advice and completed the Obesity Risk Knowledge Scale (ORK-10). Semi-structured interviews with a sub-set of 12 GPs and 6 practice nurses were audio recorded, taped and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was applied using an interpretative, inductive approach. Results: GPs were less confident about giving advice about infant feeding than health visitors (p = 0.001) and nursery nurses (p = 0.009) but more knowledgeable about the health risks of obesity (p < 0.001) than nurses (p = 0.009). HCPs who were consulted more often about feeding were less knowledgeable about the risks associated with obesity (r = -0.34, n = 114, p < 0.001). There was no relationship between HCPs’ ratings of confidence in their advice and their knowledge of the obesity risk. Six main themes emerged from the interviews: 1) Attribution of childhood obesity to family environment, 2) Infant feeding advice as the health visitor’s role, 3) Professional reliance on anecdotal or experiential knowledge about infant feeding, 4) Difficulties with recognition of, or lack of concern for, infants “at risk” of becoming obese, 5)Prioritising relationship with parent over best practice in infant feeding and 6) Lack of shared understanding for dealing with early years’ obesity. Conclusions: Intervention is needed to improve health visitors and nursery nurses’ knowledge of obesity risk and GPs and practice nurses’ capacity to identify and manage infants’ at risk of developing childhood obesity. GPs value strategies that maintain relationships with vulnerable families and interventions to improve their advice giving around infant feeding need to take account of this. Further research is needed to determine optimal ways of intervening with infants at risk of obesity in primary care

    Evaluation of an intervention to promote protective infant feeding practices to prevent childhood obesity : Outcomes of the NOURISH RCT at 14 months of age and 6 months post the first of two intervention modules

    Get PDF
    Objective: To evaluate a universal obesity prevention intervention, which commenced at infant age 4–6 months, using outcome data assessed 6 months after completion of the first of two intervention modules and 9 months from baseline. Design: Randomised controlled trial of a community-based early feeding intervention. Subjects and methods: Six hundred and ninety-eight first-time mothers (mean age 30±5 years) with healthy term infants (51% male) aged 4.3±1.0 months at baseline. Mothers and infants were randomly allocated to self-directed access to usual care or to attend two group education modules, each delivered over 3 months, that provided anticipatory guidance on early feeding practices. Outcome data reported here were assessed at infant age 13.7±1.3 months. Anthropometrics were expressed as z-scores (WHO reference). Rapid weight gain was defined as change in weight-for-age z-score (WAZ) of > +0.67. Maternal feeding practices were assessed via self-administered questionnaire. Results: There were no differences according to group allocation on key maternal and infant characteristics. At follow-up (n=598 (86%)), the control group infants had higher BMI-for-age z-score (BMIZ) (0.42±0.85 vs 0.23±0.93, P=0.009) and were more likely to show rapid weight gain from baseline to follow-up (odds ratio (OR)=1.5, confidence interval (CI) 95%=1.1–2.1, P=0.014). Mothers in the control group were more likely to report using non-responsive feeding practices that fail to respond to infant satiety cues such as encouraging eating by using food as a reward (15% vs 4%, P=0.001) or using games (67% vs 29%, P < 0.001). Conclusions: These results provide early evidence that anticipatory guidance targeting the ‘when, what and how’ of solid feeding can be effective in changing maternal feeding practices and, at least in the short term, reducing anthropometric indicators of childhood obesity risk. Analyses of outcomes at later ages are required to determine if these promising effects can be sustained
    corecore