22 research outputs found
One-step transversal palatal distraction and maxillary repositioning: technical considerations, advantages, and long-term stability.
One-step transversal palatal distraction and maxillary repositioning: technical considerations, advantages, and long-term stability.
Cortese A, Savastano M, Savastano G, Claudio PP.
Source
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Transversal maxillary hypoplasia in adolescence is a frequently seen pathology, which can be treated with a combination of surgery and orthodontic treatment to widen the maxilla in skeletally matured patients.We evaluated the advantages of a new surgical technique: Le Fort I distraction osteogenesis using a bone-borne device. Because relapse is one of the main problems in surgical maxillary expansion, long-term stability of this new technique was evaluated.
METHODS:
Data from 4 adult patients with maxillary restriction, class III malocclusion, or maxillary malposition were collected preoperatively, 4 months after distraction, and 5 years after distraction. Measurements were recorded on dental models to detect palatal expansion at dental level; cephalograms by lateral and posteroanterior plane were analyzed to detect maxillary movements.
RESULTS:
Maxillary measurements were substantially stable 5 years after distractions. Only minor dental movements occurred at the dental analysis after 5 years related to a lack of orthodontic contention without any compromise of the dental result (no crossbite relapse and class I stability).
CONCLUSIONS:
Le Fort I with down-fracture for expansion and repositioning by bone-borne distractor device cannot be used to simultaneously widen, advance, and vertically reposition the maxilla without causing healing problems, particularly using a rigid distraction device. Long-term stability can be achieved; however, further studies with a larger number of patients will be necessary for better evaluation.
PMID: 21959418 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE
Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary advancement and trasversal palatal distraction in 1 stage: five years follow up.
A new transpalatal distraction device: report of three cases with surgical and occlusal evaluations Riv. Ital. Chir. Maxillo-Facciale 2003;14:23-9
Fibrin glue and platelet-rich plasma in maxillo-facial surgery. Preparation method and clinical and radiological TC follow-up
Le Fort I Osteotomy for Maxillary Advancement and Transversal Palatal Distraction in 1 Stage: Five Years Follow up
Osteotomia di Le Fort I per avanzamento mascellare e distrazione palatale in unico tempo: follow up a 5 anni
The subcutaneous pedicled island flap: an alternative in facial skin reconstruction. Riv. It. Chir. Plastica-Clin. Exp. P.S. 34, 133-137, 2002
Le Fort I di avanzamento e distrazione palatale in un unico tempo chirurgico: report su quattro casi.
New technique: Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary advancement and palatal distraction in 1 stage.
nuova tecnica di avanzamenti e distrazione del mascellare in unico tempo chirurgic
New technique: Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary advancement and palatal distraction in 1 stage.
Transversal palatal distraction is a new method for
treating transversal maxillary hypoplasia using the osteodistraction
procedure, which has proven very
valuable in other surgical fields.1 For many years,
maxillary width discrepancies have been corrected in
pediatric patients solely by orthodontic therapies,
such as slow orthodontic expansion (SOE) and rapid
palatal expansion (RPE), and in adult patients by surgical
treatments such as surgically assisted rapid palatal
expansion (SARPE) and 2-segment Le Fort I-type
osteotomy with expansion (LFI-E).2 Although commonly
performed, these therapies present some problems
related to the tooth-borne appliances (ie, SOE,
RPE, SARPE),3 including alveolar bone bending, periodontal
membrane compression, root reabsorption,
and lateral tooth displacement and extrusion.4 Longterm
stability remains problematic as well.5 Relapse is
the main problem after a LFI-E maxillary osteotomy
combined with a midpalatal osteotomy,6 probably
due to the lack of a palatal retention appliance, fibrous
scar retraction, and palatal fibromucosal traction