Dermatan sulfate is the predominant antithrombotic glycosaminoglycan in vessel walls: Implications for a possible physiological function of heparin cofactor II

AbstractThe role of different glycosaminoglycan species from the vessel walls as physiological antithrombotic agents remains controversial. To further investigate this aspect we extracted glycosaminoglycans from human thoracic aorta and saphenous vein. The different species were highly purified and their anticoagulant and antithrombotic activities tested by in vitro and in vivo assays. We observed that dermatan sulfate is the major anticoagulant and antithrombotic among the vessel wall glycosaminoglycans while the bulk of heparan sulfate is a poorly sulfated glycosaminoglycan, devoid of anticoagulant and antithrombotic activities. Minor amounts of particular a heparan sulfate (<5% of the total arterial glycosaminoglycans) with high anticoagulant activity were also observed, as assessed by its retention on an antithrombin-affinity column. Possibly, this anticoagulant heparan sulfate originates from the endothelial cells and may exert a significant physiological role due to its location in the interface between the vessel wall and the blood. In view of these results we discuss a possible balance between the two glycosaminoglycan-dependent anticoagulant pathways present in the vascular wall. One is based on antithrombin activation by the heparan sulfate expressed by the endothelial cells. The other, which may assume special relevance after vascular endothelial injury, is based on heparin cofactor II activation by the dermatan sulfate proteoglycans synthesized by cells from the subendothelial layer

The costs of soil erosion

The aim of this study was a survey of the estimated costs of soil erosion, an issue of fundamental importance in view of the current worldwide discussions on sustainability. A list was drawn up of research papers on erosion (on-site and off-site effects) and their respective costs. The estimates indicate the amount of resources spent in the process of soil degradation, raising a general awareness of the need for soil conservation. On-site costs affect the production units directly, while off-site costs create a burden borne by the environment, economy and society. In addition, estimating the costs of soil erosion should be effective to alert the agricultural producers, society and government for the need for measures that can be implemented to bring erosion under control. Among the various estimates of soil erosion costs between 1933 a 2010, the highest figure was 45.5 billion dollars a year for the European Union. In the United States, the highest figure was 44 billion dollars a year. In Brazil, estimates for the state of Paraná indicate a value of 242 million dollars a year, and for the state of São Paulo, 212 million dollars a year. These figures show, above all, that conservation measures must be implemented if crop and livestock farming production are to be sustainable