34 research outputs found

    Gastric cancer is associated with NOS2 -954G/C polymorphism and environmental factors in a Brazilian population

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gastric cancer can progress from a chronic inflammation of the gastric mucosa resulting from <it>Helicobacter pylori </it>infection that activates the inflammatory response of the host. Therefore, polymorphisms in genes involved in the inflammatory response, such as inducible nitric oxide synthase (<it>NOS2</it>), have been implicated in gastric carcinogenesis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of <it>NOS2 </it>polymorphisms Ser<sup>608</sup>Leu (rs2297518) in exon 16, -954G/C and -1173C/T, both in the promoter region, with gastric cancer and chronic gastritis and the association of cancer with risk factors such as smoking, alcohol intake and <it>H. pylori </it>infection.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We conducted a population-based case-control study in 474 Southeast Brazilian individuals (150 with gastric cancer, 160 with chronic gastritis, and 164 healthy individuals), in which we performed <it>NOS2 </it>genotyping by PCR-RFLP.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>SNP Ser<sup>608</sup>Leu was not associated with risk of chronic gastritis or gastric cancer. The polymorphic allele -1173T was not found in the studied population. However, the frequency of -954GC+CC genotypes was significantly higher (p < 0.01) in the cancer group (48.7%) than in both the gastritis (28.1%) and the control (29.9%) groups. Multivariate logistic regression showed that the <it>NOS2 </it>SNP -954G/C was associated with higher risk of gastric cancer (OR = 1.87; 95% CI = 1.12-3.13). We also observed an association with risk factors such as smoking and alcohol intake in both the gastric cancer (OR = 2.68; 95% CI = 1.58-4.53; OR = 3.60; 95% CI = 2.05-6.32, respectively) and the chronic gastritis (OR = 1.93; 95% CI = 1.19-3.13; OR = 2.79; 95% CI = 1.55-5.02, respectively) groups. This is the first report of increased risk of gastric cancer in association with the -954G/C polymorphism. These findings show that several polymorphisms in the promoter region of the <it>NOS2 </it>gene may contribute to the susceptibility to gastric cancer.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Polymorphism <it>NOS2 </it>-954 G/C, along with alcohol intake and tobacco smoking, is associated with gastric cancer. However, the <it>NOS2 </it>Ser<sup>608</sup>Leu polymorphism was not associated with gastric carcinogenesis. The <it>NOS2 </it>-1173C/T polymorphism was absent in the studied population.</p

    Burden of disease attributable to risk factors in European countries: a scoping literature review

    Get PDF
    Objectives Within the framework of the burden of disease (BoD) approach, disease and injury burden estimates attributable to risk factors are a useful guide for policy formulation and priority setting in disease prevention. Considering the important differences in methods, and their impact on burden estimates, we conducted a scoping literature review to: (1) map the BoD assessments including risk factors performed across Europe; and (2) identify the methodological choices in comparative risk assessment (CRA) and risk assessment methods. Methods We searched multiple literature databases, including grey literature websites and targeted public health agencies websites. Results A total of 113 studies were included in the synthesis and further divided into independent BoD assessments (54 studies) and studies linked to the Global Burden of Disease (59 papers). Our results showed that the methods used to perform CRA varied substantially across independent European BoD studies. While there were some methodological choices that were more common than others, we did not observe patterns in terms of country, year or risk factor. Each methodological choice can affect the comparability of estimates between and within countries and/or risk factors, since they might significantly influence the quantification of the attributable burden. From our analysis we observed that the use of CRA was less common for some types of risk factors and outcomes. These included environmental and occupational risk factors, which are more likely to use bottom-up approaches for health outcomes where disease envelopes may not be available. Conclusions Our review also highlighted misreporting, the lack of uncertainty analysis and the under-investigation of causal relationships in BoD studies. Development and use of guidelines for performing and reporting BoD studies will help understand differences, avoid misinterpretations thus improving comparability among estimates
    corecore