The comparison of psychological and social adaptation below elbow amputation men using a mechanical and myoelectric prosthesis by using of TAPES questionnaire

Design and manufacturing of the Myoelecterical prosthesis in compared to Mechanical prosthesis must also effectively, smart, light, strong and permanence. It is time consuming and expensive that ultimately leads to significant increases in the price of Myoelecterical prosthesis. Therefore, considering the high cost of these prostheses, hence, assessment of psychological and social adaptation between two groups must be clear and explicit. In this regards, present study was conducted on this topic. In this descriptive cross-sectional analytical study, two groups compared to each other from quality of life, participants was two groups of 20 below elbow amputation veterans that use from Mechanical or Myoelectrical prosthesis that refer to central technical orthopedic Kosar. For gathering the data we use TPEAS questionnaire. This questionnaire evaluates participants from 3 items: psychosocial adaptation, functional limitation and satisfaction of life. For data analysis use to t independent and ANOVA test. This research showed that there are significant differentiations in psychosocial adaptation between two groups. The findings identified that Myoelecterical group higher psychosocial and social adaptation in compare to Mechanical group. So that the hypothesis of this research in terms of higher psychological and social adaptation in the Myoelecterical group was accepted. Keyvani Hafshejani mA, Javanshir M, Kamali M., Ghasemi MS, Emami M, Esmaeeli SA, Langari A., Sattari Naeini M. The comparison of psychological and social adaptation below elbow amputation men using a mechanical and myoelectric prosthesis by using of TAPES questionnaire. Life Sci J 2012;9(4):5583-5587] (ISSN: 1097-8135). http://www.lifesciencesite.com. 82

Continuous Measurement of Matrix Suction and Degree of Saturation of Unsaturated Soils with a New Soil-Water Retention Curve Device

The relationship between matrix suction and degree of saturation within the soil is a fundamental parameter in studying many behavioral aspects of unsaturated soils and is referred to as the soil-water retention curve (SWRC). Due to difficulties associated with negative pore water pressure measurements in unsaturated soils, most SWRC measuring techniques benefit from suction controlling methods such as axis translation or osmosis techniques. These methods provide only a few data points on the matrix suction-degree of saturation relationship and cause a discrete measured soil-water characteristic curve. However, many SWRC elements like drying and wetting curve slopes, air entry, and air expulsion values are fundamental parameters in describing the hydro-mechanical behavior of unsaturated soils. Therefore, a realistic understanding of these parameters requires continuous measurement of the degree of saturation-matrix suction relationship at more points. To this end, this paper examines the performance of a new SWRC device developed for the continuous measurement of the soil-water retention curve of unsaturated deformable soils along drying paths. The new apparatus is equipped with new miniature tensiometers enabling direct measurement of soil suction without the need for an artificial increase in pore air pressure. The variation of the degree of saturation is calculated by contiguous weighing of soil samples along drying paths. The credibility of the new SWRC apparatus is examined to investigate the influence of initial compaction on the soil-water retention response of sandy soil along with drying. This was experimentally achieved by SWRC tests on compacted soil samples with a range of void ratios between maximum and minimum void ratios to examine the influence of compaction on the slope of SWRC along with drying and variation of air entry value. The results are thoroughly discussed and compared against other available data in the literature. Also, the results suggest the fast performance of newly developed tensiometers for direct measurement of soil suction with a minute without the need for the application of elevated pore air pressure, which leads to the continuous SWRC measurement of the soil samples within 3 to 5 days along drying paths. The credibility of the new SWRC device is also examined with additional suction measurement tests using conventional jet-fill tensiometers, showing consistent results