35 research outputs found

    A Biased Random Key Genetic Algorithm Approach for Unit Commitment Problem

    Get PDF
    A Biased Random Key Genetic Algorithm (BRKGA) is proposed to find solutions for the unit commitment problem. In this problem, one wishes to schedule energy production on a given set of thermal generation units in order to meet energy demands at minimum cost, while satisfying a set of technological and spinning reserve constraints. In the BRKGA, solutions are encoded by using random keys, which are represented as vectors of real numbers in the interval [0, 1]. The GA proposed is a variant of the random key genetic algorithm, since bias is introduced in the parent selection procedure, as well as in the crossover strategy. Tests have been performed on benchmark large-scale power systems of up to 100 units for a 24 hours period. The results obtained have shown the proposed methodology to be an effective and efficient tool for finding solutions to large-scale unit commitment problems. Furthermore, from the comparisons made it can be concluded that the results produced improve upon some of the best known solutions

    Advanced Methods for Evolutionary Optimisation

    No full text
    In this paper we present two advanced methods for evolutionary optimisation. One method is based on Parallel Genetic Algorithms. It is called Co-operating Populations with Different Evolution Behaviours (CoPDEB), and allows each population to exhibit a different evolution behaviour. Results from two problems show the advantage of using different evolution behaviour on each population. The other method concerns application of GAs on constrained optimisation problems. It is called the Varying Fitness Function (VFF) method and implements a fitness function with varying penalty terms, added to the objective function for penalising infeasible solutions, in order to assist the GA to easily locate the area of the global optimum. Simulation results on two real world problems show that the VFF method outperforms the classic static fitness function implementations. 1. Introduction Using a serial Genetic Algorithm with a static quality function is a wise decision in a great number of optimisatio..

    Balancing Energy Flexibilities Through Aggregation

    No full text

    A Comparison of Decoding Strategies for the 0/1 Multi-objective Unit Commitment Problem

    Get PDF
    International audienceIn the single objective Unit Commitment Problem (UCP) the problem is usually separated in two sub-problems : the commitment problem which aims to fix the on/off scheduling of each unit and the dispatching problem which goal is to schedule the production of each turned on unit. The dispatching problem is a continuous convex prob-lem that can easily be solved exactly. For the first sub-problem genetic algorithms (GA) are often applied and usually handle binary vectors rep-resenting the solutions of the commitment problem.Then the solutions are decoded in solving the dispatching problem with an exact method to obtain the precise production of each unit. In this paper a multi-objective version of the UCP taking the emission of gas into account is presented. In this multi objective UCP the dispatching problem re-mains easy to solve whereas considering it separatly remains interesting. A multi-objective GA handling binary vectors is applied. However for a binary representation there is a set of solutions of the dispatching prob-lem that are pareto equivalent. Three decoding strategies are proposed and compared. The main contribution of this paper is the third decoding strategy which attaches an approximation of the Pareto front from the associated dispatching problem to each genotypic solution. It is shown that this decoding strategy leads to better results in comparison to the other ones
    corecore