6 research outputs found
Zinc-Porphyrin Based Dyes for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells
We have designed seven efficient
sensitizers based on the zinc-porphyrin
structure for dye sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). The geometries,
electronic properties, light harvesting efficiency (LHE), and electronic
absorption spectra of these sensitizers are studied using density
functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent density functional theory
(TD-DFT) calculations. We found that the designed sensitizers have
smaller HOMO–LUMO energy with broadened and red-shifted absorption
bands (300–1100 nm) having high molar extinction coefficient
compared to the so far known best sensitizer (YD2-o-C8). The position
of HOMO–LUMO energy level of these sensitizers ensures a positive
effect on the process of electron injection and dye regeneration.
Our theoretical calculations reveal that the new sensitizer can be
used as a potential sensitizer for DSSCs compared to YD2-o-C8
Structural Stability and Electronic Properties of CdS Condensed Clusters
First-principles calculations are carried out to understand
the
structural stability and electronic properties of 1-D condensed clusters
and their fundamental building blocks, Cd<sub><i>n</i></sub>S<sub><i>n</i></sub> (<i>n</i> = 1–6)
small clusters. By linear stacking of these stable isomers, the condensed
clusters, (Cd<sub><i>n</i></sub>S<sub><i>n</i></sub>)<sub><i>m</i></sub>, where <i>n</i> =
1–4 and <i>m</i> = 1–9, are modeled. The structural
stability of condensed clusters and their building blocks are obtained
from the electronic density of states, and it infers that s–p
hybridizations play a crucial role in stabilizing these clusters.
Electronic properties of all condensed clusters, with <i>m</i> > 4, are interesting in photocatalytic applications as they have
a lesser energy gap than that of bulk. Our calculations also show
that the (Cd<sub>3</sub>S<sub>3</sub>)<sub><i>m</i></sub> clusters are energetically more stable as compared with other-sized
condensed clusters, but such clusters can fragment into two smaller
clusters by an application of an external temperature, on the order
of 450 K
How Different Are Aromatic π Interactions from Aliphatic π Interactions and Non-π Stacking Interactions?
We compare aromatic π interactions with aliphatic π interactions of double- and triple-bonded π systems and non-π stacking interactions of single-bonded σ systems. The model dimer systems of acetylene (C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>, ethylene (C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>, ethane (C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>6</sub>)<sub>2</sub>, benzene (C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>6</sub>)<sub>2</sub>, and cyclohexane (C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>12</sub>)<sub>2</sub> are investigated. The ethylene dimer has large dispersion energy, while the acetylene dimer has strong electrostatic energy. The aromatic π interactions are strong with particularly large dispersion and electrostatic energies, which would explain why aromatic compounds are frequently found in crystal packing and molecular self-engineering. It should be noted that the difference in binding energy between the benzene dimer (aromatic–aromatic interactions) and the cyclohexane dimer (aliphatic–aliphatic interactions) is not properly described in most density functionals
Influence of the Substituents on the CH...π Interaction: Benzene–Methane Complex
Recently
we showed that the binding energy of the benzene...acetylene
complex could be tuned up to 5 kcal/mol by substituting the hydrogen
atoms of the benzene molecule with multiple electron-donating/electron-withdrawing
groups (<i>J. Chem. Theory Comput.</i> <b>2012</b>, <i>8</i>, 1935). In continuation, we have here examined
the influence of various substituents on the CH...Ï€ interaction
present in the benzene...methane complex using the CCSDÂ(T) method
at the complete basis set limit. The influence of multiple fluoro
substituents on the interaction strength of the benzene...methane
complex was found to be insignificant, while the interaction strength
linearly increases with successive addition of methyl groups. The
influence of other substituents such as CN, NO<sub>2</sub>, COOH,
Cl, and OH was found to be negligible. The NH<sub>2</sub> group enhances
the binding strength similarly to the methyl group. Energy decomposition
analysis predicts the dispersion energy component to be on an average
three times larger than the electrostatic energy component. Multidimensional
correlation analysis shows that the exchange-repulsion and dispersion
terms are correlated very well with the interaction distance (<i>r</i>) and with a combination of the interaction distance (<i>r</i>) and molar refractivity (MR), while the electrostatic
component correlates well when the Hammett constant is used in combination
with the interaction distance (<i>r</i>). Various recently
developed DFT methods were used to assess their ability to predict
the binding energy of various substituted benzene...methane complexes,
and the M06-2X, B97-D, and B3LYP-D3 methods were found to be the best
performers, giving a mean absolute deviation of ∼0.15 kcal/mol
Tuning the C–H···π Interaction by Different Substitutions in Benzene–Acetylene Complexes
The influence of substitutions in aromatic moieties on
the binding
strength of their complexes is a subject of broad importance. Using
a set of various substituted benzenes, Sherrill and co-workers (J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 13244; J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 8377) recently
showed that the strength of a stacking interaction (π···π
interaction) is enhanced by adding substituents regardless of their
nature. Although the binding strength of an activated C–H···π
interaction is comparable to that of a stacking interaction, a similar
systematic study is hitherto unknown in the literature. We have computed
the stabilization energies of the C–H···π
complex of acetylene and multiple fluoro-/methyl-substituted benzenes
at the coupled-cluster single and double (triple) excitation [CCSDÂ(T)]/complete
basis set (CBS) limit. The trend for interaction energies was found
to be hexafluorobenzene–acetylene < <i>sym</i>-tetrafluorobenzene–acetylene < <i>sym</i>-trifluorobenzene–acetylene
< <i>sym</i>-difluorobenzene–acetylene < benzene–acetylene
< <i>sym</i>-dimethylbenzene–acetylene < <i>sym</i>-trimethylbenzene–acetylene < <i>sym</i>-tetramethylbenzene–acetylene < hexamethylbenzene–acetylene.
Therefore, contrary to the case of stacking interaction (Hohenstein et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 13244), we show here that electron-withdrawing groups weaken the dimer
while electron-donating groups strengthen the interaction energy of
the dimer. Various recently developed density functional theoretic
(DFT) methods were assessed for their performance and the M05-2X,
M06-2X, and ωB97X-D methods were found to be the best performers.
These best DFT performers were employed in determining the influence
of other representative substituents (-NO<sub>2</sub>, -CN, -COOH,
-Br, -Cl, -OH, and -NH<sub>2</sub>) as an extension to the above work.
The results for the complex of acetylene and various para-disubstituted
benzenes revealed a trend in binding energies that is in accordance
with the ring-activating/deactivating capacity of each of these groups.
The stabilization energy was partitioned via the DFT symmetry-adapted
perturbation theory (SAPT) method, and both dispersion and electrostatic
interactions were seen to be major driving forces for the complex
stabilization. Interestingly, the sum of the energy contributors such
as dispersion, exchange, induction, etc., is close to zero and the
total energy follows the trend of the electrostatic energy. We observe
an excellent linear correlation between the optimized intermolecular
separation of the different complexes and the exchange/dispersion
interaction
Self-Assembly of Manganese(I)-Based Molecular Squares: Synthesis and Spectroscopic and Structural Characterization
Syntheses of manganeseÂ(I)-based molecular squares have
been accomplished
in facile one-pot reaction conditions at room temperature. Self-assembly
of eight components has resulted in the formation of M<sub>4</sub>L<sub>4</sub>-type metallacyclophanes [MnÂ(CO)<sub>3</sub>BrÂ(μ-L)]<sub>4</sub> (<b>1</b>–<b>3</b>) using pentacarbonylbromomanganese
as metal precursor and rigid azine ligands such as pyrazine, 4,4′-bipyridine,
and <i>trans</i>-1,2-bisÂ(4-pyridyl)Âethylene, respectively,
as bridging ligands. The metallacyclophanes have been characterized
on the basis of IR, NMR, and UV–vis spectroscopic techniques
and single-crystal X-ray diffraction methods