Atypical Femoral Fracture in Hypophosphatasia: A Systematic Review

Objective. To summarize the characteristics of all reported patients with hypophosphatasia (HPP) who sustained atypical femoral fracture (AFF) and identify all available evidence to quantify the rate of coexistence between HPP and AFF. Methods. Potentially eligible articles were identified from the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from its inception to September 2022, using a search strategy consisting of terms related to “Hypophosphatasia” and “Atypical femoral fracture.” Eligible articles must report one of the following information: (1) individual data of patients diagnosed with HPP and AFF, (2) prevalence of HPP among patients with AFF, or (3) prevalence of AFF among patients of HPP. Characteristics of patients reported in each study were extracted. Results. A total of 148 articles were identified. After the systematic review, 24 articles met the eligibility criteria. A total of 28 patients with AFF and HPP were identified. The mean ± SD age of the reported patients was 53.8 ± 12.5 years, and 22 patients (78.6%) were female. Nine patients (32.1%) received antiresorptive medication (bisphosphonate and/or denosumab), and two patients (7.1%) received teriparatide prior to the development of AFF. Seven (25.0%) and eighteen (64.3%) patients sustained unilateral and bilateral AFF, respectively (laterality not reported in three cases). Thirteen patients (46.4%) had a history of fractures at other sites. Four (14.3%) and seven (25.0%) patients received asfotase alfa and teriparatide after sustaining AFF. Two studies reported the prevalence of AFF among patients with HPP of approximately 10%. One study reported one HPP patient in a cohort of 72 patients with AFF. Conclusions. Based on the limited evidence, AFF occurred in up to 10% of patients with HPP. Based on the 28 case reports, about two-thirds did not receive antiresorptive treatment, suggesting that the HPP itself could potentially be a risk factor for AFF

Oral rivaroxaban for the treatment of symptomatic pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: A fixed-dose regimen of rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, has been shown to be as effective as standard anticoagulant therapy for the treatment of deep-vein thrombosis, without the need for laboratory monitoring. This approach may also simplify the treatment of pulmonary embolism. METHODS: In a randomized, open-label, event-driven, noninferiority trial involving 4832 patients who had acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism with or without deep-vein thrombosis, we compared rivaroxaban (15 mg twice daily for 3 weeks, followed by 20 mg once daily) with standard therapy with enoxaparin followed by an adjusted-dose vitamin K antagonist for 3, 6, or 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism. The principal safety outcome was major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. RESULTS: Rivaroxaban was noninferior to standard therapy (noninferiority margin, 2.0; P=0.003) for the primary efficacy outcome, with 50 events in the rivaroxaban group (2.1%) versus 44 events in the standard-therapy group (1.8%) (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 1.68). The principal safety outcome occurred in 10.3% of patients in the rivaroxaban group and 11.4% of those in the standard-therapy group (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.07; P=0.23). Major bleeding was observed in 26 patients (1.1%) in the rivaroxaban group and 52 patients (2.2%) in the standard-therapy group (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.79; P=0.003). Rates of other adverse events were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: A fixed-dose regimen of rivaroxaban alone was noninferior to standard therapy for the initial and long-term treatment of pulmonary embolism and had a potentially improved benefit-risk profile. (Funded by Bayer HealthCare and Janssen Pharmaceuticals; EINSTEIN-PE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00439777.)