3 research outputs found
Hybrids of the bHLH and bZIP Protein Motifs Display Different DNA-Binding Activities In Vivo vs. In Vitro
Minimalist hybrids comprising the DNA-binding domain of bHLH/PAS (basic-helix-loop-helix/Per-Arnt-Sim) protein Arnt fused to the leucine zipper (LZ) dimerization domain from bZIP (basic region-leucine zipper) protein C/EBP were designed to bind the E-box DNA site, CACGTG, targeted by bHLHZ (basic-helix-loop-helix-zipper) proteins Myc and Max, as well as the Arnt homodimer. The bHLHZ-like structure of ArntbHLH-C/EBP comprises the Arnt bHLH domain fused to the C/EBP LZ: i.e. swap of the 330 aa PAS domain for the 29 aa LZ. In the yeast one-hybrid assay (Y1H), transcriptional activation from the E-box was strong by ArntbHLH-C/EBP, and undetectable for the truncated ArntbHLH (PAS removed), as detected via readout from the HIS3 and lacZ reporters. In contrast, fluorescence anisotropy titrations showed affinities for the E-box with ArntbHLH-C/EBP and ArntbHLH comparable to other transcription factors (Kd 148.9 nM and 40.2 nM, respectively), but only under select conditions that maintained folded protein. Although in vivo yeast results and in vitro spectroscopic studies for ArntbHLH-C/EBP targeting the E-box correlate well, the same does not hold for ArntbHLH. As circular dichroism confirms that ArntbHLH-C/EBP is a much more strongly α-helical structure than ArntbHLH, we conclude that the nonfunctional ArntbHLH in the Y1H must be due to misfolding, leading to the false negative that this protein is incapable of targeting the E-box. Many experiments, including protein design and selections from large libraries, depend on protein domains remaining well-behaved in the nonnative experimental environment, especially small motifs like the bHLH (60–70 aa). Interestingly, a short helical LZ can serve as a folding- and/or solubility-enhancing tag, an important device given the focus of current research on exploration of vast networks of biomolecular interactions
The bZIP Dimer Localizes at DNA Full-Sites Where Each Basic Region Can Alternately Translocate and Bind to Subsites at the Half-Site
Crystal structures of the GCN4 bZIP (basic region/leucine
zipper)
with the AP-1 or CRE site show how each GCN4 basic region binds to
a 4 bp cognate half-site as a single DNA target; however, this may
not always fully describe how bZIP proteins interact with their target
sites. Previously, we showed that the GCN4 basic region interacts
with all 5 bp in half-site TTGCG (termed 5H-LR) and that 5H-LR comprises
two 4 bp subsites, TTGC and TGCG, which individually are also target
sites of the basic region. In this work, we explore how the basic
region interacts with 5H-LR when the bZIP dimer localizes to full-sites.
Using AMBER molecular modeling, we simulated GCN4 bZIP complexes with
full-sites containing 5H-LR to investigate in silico the interface
between the basic region and 5H-LR. We also performed in vitro investigation
of bZIP–DNA interactions at a number of full-sites that contain
5H-LR versus either subsite: we analyzed results from DNase I footprinting
and electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and from EMSA titrations
to quantify binding affinities. Our computational and experimental
results together support a highly dynamic DNA-binding model: when
a bZIP dimer localizes to its target full-site, the basic region can
alternately recognize either subsite as a distinct target at 5H-LR
and translocate between the subsites, potentially by sliding and hopping.
This model provides added insights into how α-helical DNA-binding
domains of transcription factors can localize to their gene regulatory
sequences in vivo