291 research outputs found

    Nonadherence to primary prophylaxis against Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia.

    Get PDF
    BackgroundDespite the effectiveness of prophylaxis, Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) continues to be the most common serious opportunistic infection among HIV-infected persons. We describe factors associated with nonadherence to primary PCP prophylaxis.Methodology/principal findingsWe used 2000-2004 data from the Supplement to HIV/AIDS Surveillance (SHAS) project, a cross-sectional interview project of HIV-infected persons >or=18 years conducted in 18 states. We limited the analysis to persons who denied having prior PCP, reported having a current prescription to prevent PCP, and answered the question "In the past 30 days, how often were you able to take the PCP medication(s) exactly the way your doctor told you to take them?" We used multivariable logistic regression to describe factors associated with nonadherence. Of 1,666 subjects prescribed PCP prophylaxis, 305 (18.3%) were nonadherent. Persons were more likely to be nonadherent if they reported using marijuana (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1-2.4), non-injection drugs other than marijuana (aOR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.0-2.1), or injection drugs (aOR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.3-4.1) in the past year; their mental health was "not good" for >or=1 day during the past month (aOR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.2-2.2); their most recent CD4 count was <200 cells/microL (aOR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.1-2.2); or taking ART usually (aOR = 9.6, 95% CI = 6.7-13.7) or sometimes/rarely/never (aOR = 18.4, 95% CI = 11.1-30.4), compared with always, as prescribed.Conclusion/significanceProviders should inquire about and promote strategies to improve adherence to PCP prophylaxis, particularly among persons who use illicit drugs, have mental health issues, and who are not compliant with ART to reduce the occurrence of PCP

    Fat Graft for Parotidectomy Defect Reconstruction in the Setting of Malignant Disease

    Get PDF
    Objectives: Currently, limited data examines the safety of utilizing fat transfers in the setting of malignant parotid disease. Here we evaluate the safety of fat graft reconstruction of parotidectomy defects in the setting of malignant disease. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study Methods: Electronic chart review of patients who underwent parotidectomy from 2012-2020 were reviewed. Results: Three hundred and sixty-one patients were identified at a single institution who underwent parotidectomy, and 113 (31.3%) were for malignancy. One hundred and thirty-two patients underwent fat graft reconstruction (49.2%, n=65 for umbilical, 50.8%, n=67 for dermal). One-third of patients had malignant pathology (34.8%, n=46). The most common malignant tumors were squamous cell carcinoma (n=15), acinic cell carcinoma (n=9), and mucoepidermoid carcinoma (n=6). Twenty patients (45.5%) received postoperative radiation therapy. Complications included: surgical site necrosis (13%), hematoma (4.3%), and infection (2.2%). Overall incidence of malignant recurrence was 4.4% with a mean time of follow-up of 10.3 (range 0 – 77.3) months. Incidence of malignant recurrence in the fat graft reconstruction subset was 0% with a mean follow-up of 9.8 (range 0.2 – 49.3) months. There was no association with use of fat graft and recurrence (p\u3e0.05). Conclusion: Parotidectomy defects for malignant neoplasms can be reconstructed with fat graft transfers with no impact on surveillance for disease recurrence.https://jdc.jefferson.edu/otoposters/1010/thumbnail.jp

    Intraoperative Evaluation of Nasal Valve Repair Interventions: A Prospective Analysis

    Get PDF
    Objectives: To allow for early identification and treatment of inadequate nasal valve repair interventions in the intraoperative setting, based on degree of nasal valve collapse quantified by suction-assisted pressure readings. Patient outcomes were measured by comparison of pre- and post-operative Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) surveys. Study Design: Prospective study. Methods: All enrolled patients undergo suction-assisted evaluation of nasal valve collapse before surgical intervention. Patients randomized into the experimental group underwent repeat assessment after various nasal valve interventions, compared to a control group where adequacy of interventions was assessed by palpation of the nasal ala. Results: 20 patients who underwent nasal valve repair were first randomized into control (10) or experimental (10) groups. Two patients in the control group did not receive nasal valve work due to pre-operative readings and were excluded from further analysis. Nasal valve interventions included alar rim grafts (5), spreader grafts (10), batten grafts (2), and nasal valve suture suspension (8). After nasal valve interventions, average suction reading at first sign of collapse increased by 92% (p \u3c 0.0001) and average suction reading at maximal collapse increased by 16% (p \u3c 0.0001). Pre-operative NOSE scores decreased by 55% (p \u3c 0.0001) at the first follow-up visit at 9.3±3.5 days. No patients in the experimental group required additional nasal valve interventions after repeat suction-assisted evaluations intraoperatively. Conclusion: Intraoperative suction-assisted evaluation of nasal valve collapse can help assess adequacy of nasal valve interventions and determine whether additional interventions are necessary to improve nasal valve integrity.https://jdc.jefferson.edu/otoposters/1011/thumbnail.jp
    • …
    corecore