1 research outputs found
What's Seneca to Him? Senecan Shakespeare
Although for Scaliger Seneca was even greater than Euripides, it has often been acknowledged that Romantic writers have bequeathed us a negative legacy that has debased him as second-rate, imitative, and inauthentic compared to Greek authors. Such harsh criticism has distorted for centuries âour understanding of Shakespeareâs engagement with Senecan tragedyâ, so much so that âeven if Shakespeareans now acknowledge Seneca to be important for early modern tragedy we remain unlikely to see his influence as an especially robust or interesting oneâ (Perry 2021, 2). If T.S. Eliot inaugurated an interpretation of the linkage between Seneca and Shakespeare through interest in inwardness and self-dramatisation, the foregrounding of the self (or of Bradenâs âautarkic selfhoodâ, 1985) is made possible only by situating this experience within the playworld, in spaces visualising and framing the surfacing of unconscious desires and repressed passions beyond plot structures. By focusing on questions of authorial construction, appropriation, domestication, but also âimprovementâ and expansion, this issue engages with these different threads of confluences, aware of, and dallying with, perspectival mobility about what constructing Senecan Shakespeare may mean