Revisiting the statistical isotropy of GRB sky distribution

The assumption of homogeneity and isotropy on large scales is one of the main hypotheses of the standard cosmology. In this paper, we test the hypothesis of isotropy from the two-point angular correlation function of 2626 gamma-ray bursts (GRB) of the FERMI GRB catalogue. We show that the uncertainties in the GRB positions induce spurious anisotropic signals in their sky distribution. However, when such uncertainties are taken into account no significant evidence against the large-scale statistical isotropy is found. This result remains valid even for the sky distribution of short-lived GRB, contrarily to previous reports.Comment: 9 pages, 10 figures, 2 tables, match accepted versio

Forecasting cosmological constraints from age of high-z galaxies

We perform Monte Carlo simulations based on current age estimates of high-z objects to forecast constraints on the equation of state (EoS) of the dark energy. In our analysis, we use two different EoS parameterizations, namely, the so-called CPL and its uncorrelated form and calculate the improvements on the figure of merit for both cases. Although there is a clear dependence of the FoM with the size and accuracy of the synthetic age samples, we find that the most substantial gain in FoM comes from a joint analysis involving age and baryon acoustic oscillation data.Comment: 4 pages, 13 figures, late

The dipole anisotropy of WISE x SuperCOSMOS number counts

We probe the isotropy of the Universe with the largest all-sky photometric redshift dataset currently available, namely WISE~$\times$~SuperCOSMOS. We search for dipole anisotropy of galaxy number counts in multiple redshift shells within the $0.10 < z < 0.35$ range, for two subsamples drawn from the same parent catalogue. Our results show that the dipole directions are in good agreement with most of the previous analyses in the literature, and in most redshift bins the dipole amplitudes are well consistent with $\Lambda$CDM-based mocks in the cleanest sample of this catalogue. In the $z<0.15$ range, however, we obtain a persistently large anisotropy in both subsamples of our dataset. Overall, we report no significant evidence against the isotropy assumption in this catalogue except for the lowest redshift ranges. The origin of the latter discrepancy is unclear, and improved data may be needed to explain it.Comment: 5 pages, 4 figures, 2 tables. Published in MNRA