Cashew nut allergy: clinical relevance and allergen characterisation

Cashew plant (Anacardium occidentale L.) is the most relevant species of the Anacardium genus. It presents high economic value since it is widely used in human nutrition and in several industrial applications. Cashew nut is a well-appreciated food (belongs to the tree nut group), being widely consumed as snacks and in processed foods by the majority of world's population. However, cashew nut is also classified as a potent allergenic food known to be responsible for triggering severe and systemic immune reactions (e.g. anaphylaxis) in sensitised/allergic individuals that often demand epinephrine treatment and hospitalisation. So far, three groups of allergenic proteins have been identified and characterised in cashew nut: Ana o 1 and Ana o 2 (cupin superfamily) and Ana o 3 (prolamin superfamily), which are all classified as major allergens. The prevalence of cashew nut allergy seems to be rising in industrialised countries with the increasing consumption of this nut. There is still no cure for cashew nut allergy, as well as for other food allergies; thus, the allergic patients are advised to eliminate it from their diets. Accordingly, when carefully choosing processed foods that are commercially available, the allergic consumers have to rely on proper food labelling. In this sense, the control of labelling compliance is much needed, which has prompted the development of proficient analytical methods for allergen analysis. In the recent years, significant research advances in cashew nut allergy have been accomplished, which are highlighted and discussed in this review.This work was supported by FCT/MEC through national funds and co-financed by FEDER, under the Partnership Agreement PT2020 with grant no. UID/QUI/50006/2013–POCI/01/ 0145/FEDER/007265. Joana Costa is grateful to FCT post-doctoral grant (SFRH/BPD/102404/2014) financed by POPH-QREN (subsidised by FSE and MCTES).info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

An insight into the early mechanisms of allergen-specific immunotherapy

Evaluation of: Bussmann C, Xia J, Allam J-P, Maintz L, Bieber T, Novak N: Early markers for protective mechanisms during rush venom immunotherapy. Allergy 65, 1558-1565 (2010). The mechanisms governing the induction of peripheral tolerance as a result of specific immunotherapy are far from being clearly characterized. In the last 15 years, a number of studies have highlighted the tolerogenic role of regulatory T cells, blocking antibodies and anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-β; however, the best part of our knowledge is mostly limited to mechanisms underlying the maintenance phase. By contrast, little is known regarding the very early effects seen in rush and ultrarush immunotherapy protocols. In this article, Bussmann et al. provide evidence on the possible role, first, of inhibitory receptors of the leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor family and, second, of the upregulation of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and subsequent tryptophan starvation on the induction of specific tolerance within a few hours after the initial doses. They also suggest that the observed changes reflect the activation of protective mechanisms, which we are just beginning to understand. © 2011 Future Medicine Ltd