2 research outputs found

    Handover practices of nurses transferring trauma patients from intensive care units to the ward: A multimethod observational study

    No full text
    Poor-quality patient handover leads to adverse patient outcomes. Consequently, handover has been identified as a national and international priority for preventing patient harm. Risks are exacerbated during transfers of trauma intensive care unit (ICU) patients to a ward because of the complexity of their injuries coupled with a de-escalation in care and monitoring. This study assessed current handover practices for ICU trauma patients, identifying barriers and facilitators to best practice handover. A multimethod design was used, including naturalistic observations of clinical handover of trauma patients transferred to a ward and semistructured interviews with both the ICU and ward nurses caring for the trauma patient. The study was conducted at an Australian metropolitan public adult teaching hospital ICU. Purposive maximal sampling of patient handover opportunities was sought. Recruitment continued until data saturation was reached using thematic analysis. Ten ICU and ward nurses were recruited, with 10 observations of handover and 20 interviews conducted. Observations of the handovers identified multiple issues, including deficits and discrepancies in the information communicated that could impact patient safety, variable handover processes, and poor patient and family involvement. Interviews elicited two major themes around the handover: practices and processes. Nurses identified that interruptions, time, and workload pressures presented barriers to handover, whilst teamwork, using a structured and systematic approach, preparation time for handover, and communication before transfer facilitated effective handover and transfer. Nurses suggested a structured tool to aid handover. This study identified clinically significant deficits and discrepancies in the information communicated to the ward nurses. Nurses identified that interruptions, time, and workload pressures presented barriers to effective handover. Teamwork where preparation and the handover event are prioritised over other activities is needed. A minimum data set for handover in conjunction with patients and family members is recommended. © 2020 Australian College of Critical Care Nurses Lt

    No association between vitamin D levels around time of birth and later risk of developing oligo- and polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a Danish case–cohort study

    No full text
    <p><b>Objectives</b>: Basic and epidemiological studies on rheumatic autoimmune diseases have suggested an association between vitamin D levels around time of birth and disease risk. The literature on vitamin D and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is scarce. We hypothesized that low levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] around time of birth would be associated with increased risk of oligo- or polyarticular JIA.</p> <p><b>Method</b>: We conducted a case–cohort study of validated cases diagnosed with oligo- and polyarticular JIA (1993–2012) and controls matched on date of birth. Cases and controls were born in the period 1983–2010. Cases were diagnosed using international criteria. The concentration of 25(OH)D was assessed from neonatal dried blood spot (DBS) samples using high-sensitivity liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using conditional logistic regression and a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test for season and birth year 25(OH)D variations. A total of 300 matched pairs were included in the statistical analyses.</p> <p><b>Results</b>: No significant association was found between levels of 25(OH)D and JIA risk in the adjusted model [OR (per 25 nmol/L increase) 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9–1.6, p<i> </i>= 0.2]. 25(OH)D levels were found to fluctuate significantly with season (p < 0.0001) and year (p < 0.0001). The median level of 25(OH)D was 34.4 nmol/L in cases and 31.5 nmol/L in controls.</p> <p><b>Conclusions</b>: Our study does not support the hypothesis that a window of vulnerability exists around time of birth with regard to 25(OH)D levels and later JIA risk. Further studies should explore whether 25(OH)D levels during early pregnancy or infancy may influence JIA risk.</p
    corecore