Feasibility and reliability of PRISMA-Medical for specialty-based incident analysis

Aims and objectives: In this study, the feasibility and reliability of the Prevention Recovery Information System for Monitoring and Analysis (PRISMA)-Medical method for systematic, specialty-based analysis and classification of incidents in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) were determined. Methods: After the introduction of a Neonatology System for Analysis and Feedback on Medical Events (NEOSAFE) in eight tertiary care NICUs and one paediatric surgical ICU, PRISMA-Medical was started to be used to identify root causes of voluntary reported incidents by multidisciplinary unit patient safety committees. Committee members were PRISMA-trained and familiar with the department and its processes. In this study, the results of PRISMA-analysis of incidents reported during the first year are described. At t¿=¿3 months and t¿=¿12 months after introduction, test cases were performed to measure agreement at three levels of root cause classification using PRISMA-Medical. Inter-rater reliability was determined by calculating generalised ¿ values for each level of classification. Results: During the study period, 981 out of 1786 eligible incidents (55%) were analysed for underlying root causes. In total, 2313 root causes were identified and classified, giving an average of 2.4 root causes for every incident. Although substantial agreement (¿ 0.70–0.81) was reached at the main level of root cause classification of the test cases (discrimination between technical, organisational and human failure) and agreement among the committees at the second level (discrimination between skill-based, rule-based and knowledge-based errors) was acceptable (¿ 0.53–0.59), discrimination between rule-based errors (the third level of classification) was more difficult to assess (¿ 0.40–0.47). Conclusion: With some restraints, PRISMA-Medical proves to be both feasible and acceptably reliable to identify and classify multiple causes of medical events in the NICU

Specialty-based, voluntary incident reporting in neonatal intensive care: description of 4846 incident reports

OBJECTIVES: To examine the characteristics of incidents reported after introduction of a voluntary, non-punitive incident reporting system for neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in the Netherlands; and to investigate which types of reported incident pose the highest risk to patients in the NICU. DESIGN: Prospective multicentre survey. METHODS: Voluntary, non-punitive incident reporting was introduced in eight level III NICUs and one paediatric surgical ICU. An incident was defined as any unintended event which (could have) reduced the safety margin for the patient. Multidisciplinary, unit-based patient safety committees systematically collected and analysed incident reports, and assigned risk scores to each reported incident. Data were centrally collected for specialty-based analysis. This paper describes the characteristics of incidents reported during the first year. Bivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify high-risk incident categories. RESULTS: There were 5225 incident reports on 3859 admissions, of which 4846 were eligible for analysis. Incidents with medication were most frequently reported (27%), followed by laboratory (10%) and enteral nutrition (8%). Severe harm was described in seven incident reports, and moderate harm in 63 incident reports. Incidents involving mechanical ventilation and blood products were most likely to be assigned high-risk scores, followed by those involving parenteral nutrition, intravascular lines and medication dosing errors. CONCLUSIONS: Incidents occur much more frequently in Dutch NICUs than has been previously observed, and their impact on patient morbidity is considerable. Reported incidents concerning mechanical ventilation, blood products, intravascular lines, parenteral nutrition and medication dosing errors pose the highest risk to patients in the NIC

Opportunities in EUcase law for achieving Dutch sustainable energy target. It's up to the Netherlands to seize them

This paper draws on recent case law of the European Court of Justice to examine the opportunities available in European Union law to promote the generating of electricity from renewable sources within the Dutch system for managing congestion in the electricity grid (CMS) and for allocating the costs of this system. EU law has been found to offer considerable scope for prioritising electricity generated from renewable sources. Unfortunately, the Dutch Minister of Economic Affairs has not given sufficient consideration to the opportunities available in EU law to justify the Dutch congestion management and cost-differentiation system and has provisionally maintained the principle of socialising the costs by passing them on to all Dutch energy consumers. In this respect, he has all too easily disregarded the other opportunities available in EU law for allocating the costs of the Dutch congestion management system

Toezicht op de wholesalemarkten voor energie en de bescherming van consumentenbelangen

Dit artikel analyseert aan de hand van concrete zaken wat de (on)mogelijkheden zijn van drie verschillende Europese regelgevingskaders (derde energiepakket, REMIT en Europese mededingingsregels) voor het toezicht op de wholesalemarkten voor energie. Het wordt kritisch bekeken of, en zo ja, hoe dit complexe samenspel van regels, dat een zware belasting zal zijn voor de toekomstige Autoriteit Consument en Markt, uiteindelijk kan bijdragen aan de centrale doelstelling van de Europese energierichtlijnen: de bescherming en bevordering van de positie van de energieconsument bij het sluiten van energieleveringscontracten

De verschillende gezichten van de energieconsument: naar een gedragseconomische benadering van de regulering van de energiesector

Deze bijdrage bekijkt op kritische wijze de juridische en economische aannames van de Europese wetgever over de vraag wie de energieconsument is en wat zijn rollen zijn. Bepleit wordt, dat een gedragseconomische benadering van de regulering van de energiesector - als aanvulling en nuancering op het rationele-keuzemodel - zorgt dat de wetgever en nationale toezichthouders beter kunnen inspelen op de kenmerken van het consumentengedrag in de praktijk