An observational retrospective study on safety and functional outcomes of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using Sironix suture button and interference screw

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a persistent orthopaedic condition that affects a wide spectrum of people. ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) stands out as the primary treatment option. Graft fixation with suture buttons and interference screws has proven to be a highly successful and reliable method for ACL-R. In this context, our research aims to assess the safety and functional outcomes of patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL-R using the Sironix suture button and interference screw. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study. Patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL-R using Sironix suture button and interference screw (January 2018-March 2022) were included in the study. Functional outcomes of patients were evaluated using the international knee documentation committee (IKDC) assessment, the Tegner activity scale (TAS), the Lysholm knee scoring scale, the modified knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) quality of life subscale, and the single assessment numerical evaluation (SANE) score. Adverse events, if any, were recorded. Results: All patients achieved excellent outcome measures for IKDC, Tegner, Lysholm, KOOS, and SANE scores. The mean (SD) IKDC score was 88.76 (7.16), Tegner activity score was 5.9 (1.13), while the Lysholm score was 96.9 (6.56). The overall KOOS score was 93.7 (7.52), and the overall SANE score for the affected joint was 94.5 (7.22). Conclusions: Arthroscopic ACL-R using Sironix implants (Helysis titanium interference screw, Helysis PLDLA+β-TCP interference screw, Infiloop fixed loop UHMWPE suture titanium button, Proloop adjustable loop UHMWPE suture Titanium button, and Titanium suture disc) demonstrated safety and good functional outcomes

Biomechanical techniques to evaluate tibial rotation. A systematic review

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1665-z.Purpose: This article systematically reviewed the biomechanical techniques to quantify tibial rotation, for an overview of how to choose a suitable technique for specific clinical application. Methods: A systematic search was conducted and finally 110 articles were included in this study. The articles were categorized by the conditions of how the knee was examined: external load application, physical examination and dynamic task. Results: The results showed that two-thirds of the included studies measured tibial rotation under external load application, of which over 80% of the experiments employed a cadaveric model. The common techniques used included direct displacement measurement, motion sensor, optical tracking system and universal force moment sensor. Intra-operative navigation system was used to document tibial rotation when the knee was examined by clinical tests. For dynamic assessment of knee rotational stability, motion analysis with skin reflective markers was frequently used although this technique is less accurate due to the skin movement when compared with radiographic measurement. Conclusion: This study reports various biomechanical measurement techniques to quantify tibial rotation in the literatures. To choose a suitable measurement technique for a specific clinical application, it is suggested to quantify the effectiveness of a new designed surgical technique by using a cadaveric model before applying to living human subjects for intra-operative evaluation or long-time functional stability assessment. Attention should also be paid on the study's purpose, whether to employ a cadaveric model and the way of stress applied to the knee. Level of evidence: IV