Situation, Figuration und Gewalt. Versuch eines gewaltsoziologischen Dialoges zwischen Randall Collins und Norbert Elias am Beispiel sexueller Kriegsgewalt

Ebner J, Stopfinger M. Situation, Figuration und Gewalt. Versuch eines gewaltsoziologischen Dialoges zwischen Randall Collins und Norbert Elias am Beispiel sexueller Kriegsgewalt. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie. 2020;45(S1):43-67.In diesem Beitrag werden zwei in der soziologischen Gewaltforschung etablierte Ansätze – die mikrosoziologisch-situationistische Gewalttheorie von Randall Collins und die figurations- bzw. prozesssoziologische Perspektive von Norbert Elias – auf ihre Eignung für die Analyse von sexueller Kriegsgewalt überprüft. Nach einer kurzen Diskussion des Forschungsstandes zu sexueller Kriegsgewalt wird dieses Thema einmal mit Collins und einmal mit Elias beleuchtet. Danach werden die beiden Zugänge einander gegenübergestellt, um Unterschiede und Gemeinsamkeiten herauszuarbeiten. Darauf aufbauend wird versucht, die Fruchtbarkeit eines „pragmatischen Dialoges“ zwischen einem mikro- und einem figurationssoziologisch inspirierten Ansatz auszuloten. Abschließend wird diskutiert, welche Folgerungen sich daraus für die Forschung zu sexueller Kriegsgewalt ergeben.In this paper, two approaches established in sociological violence research – Randall Collins’ micro-sociological theory of violence and Norbert Elias’ figuration- and process-sociological perspective—are examined for their suitability for the analysis of sexual violence in war. After a brief discussion of the current state of research on sexual violence in war, this topic will be examined once with Collins and once with Elias. The two approaches are then juxtaposed in order to highlight differences and similarities. Building on this, the fruitfulness of a “pragmatic dialogue” between a micro- and a figuration-sociologically inspired approach will be explored. The concluding section discusses the implications for research on sexual violence in war

P3402Validation of the SCORE O.P. for prediction of cardiovascular disease mortality in a large population of elderly individuals

Abstract Background Estimation of absolute cardiovascular risk in apparently healthy individuals, using SCORE (Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation) is recommended by the ESC guidelines on cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention in clinical practice. Recently, the SCORE system has been extended by the SCORE O.P. aiming to improve estimates of cardiovascular risk specifically in older persons (65 years and older). Purpose The aim of this study was to validate the SCORE O.P. in an Austrian population of 34,909 healthy individuals aged between 65 and 80 years which were prospectively followed for a minimum of 10 years. Methods Predicted fatal CVD and coronary heart disease (CHD) event rates within 10 years were calculated using the “SCORE O.P. risk function for low risk regions” and compared to the actually observed rates, thereby assessing calibration. In addition, predicted probabilities were plotted against observed mortality by deciles of predicted risk. Regarding discrimination, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis and corresponding c-statistics were used. Results In 14,586 males, 1,509 deaths from CVD (10.4%) and 847 deaths from CHD (5.8%) occurred within 10 years of follow-up. SCORE O.P. predicted 1,699 fatal CVD (11.7%) and 872 CHD (6.0%) events. In male high risk individuals (10th decile), SCORE O.P. overestimated mortality from CVD and CHD. C-statistics were 0.68 (95% CI 0.67–0.70) for CVD and 0.67 (0.65–0.69) for CHD. In 20,323 females, 1,340 deaths from CVD (6.6%) and 672 deaths from CHD (3.3%) were observed. SCORE O.P. predicted 1,232 fatal CVD (6.1%) and 539 CHD events (2.7%). In female high risk individuals (8–10th deciles), SCORE O.P. underestimated mortality from CVD and CHD. C-statistics were 0.77 (0.75–0.78) for CVD and 0.77 (0.75–0.79) for CHD. Conclusion With regard to overall accuracy, the SCORE O.P. performed considerably well in this elderly Austrian population. However, in high-risk individuals, cardiovascular risk was overestimated for males and underestimated for females. SCORE O.P. was able to discriminate high-risk from low-risk individuals, better in women than in men. </jats:sec