50 research outputs found
Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery
Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery of the infrarenal aorta: The early learning curve
Background Recently introduced robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) facilitates endoscopic surgical manipulation and thereby reduces
the learning curve for (advanced) laparoscopic surgery. We present our learning curve with RALS for aortobifemoral bypass
grafting as a treatment for aortoiliac occlusive disease.
Methods Between February 2002 and May 2005, 17 patients were treated in our institution with robot-assisted laparoscopic aorto-bifemoral
bypasses. Dissection was performed laparoscopically and the robot was used to make the aortic anastomosis. Operative time,
clamping time, and anastomosis time, as well as blood loss and hospital stay, were used as parameters to evaluate the results
and to compare the first eight (group 1) and the last nine patients (group2).
Results Total median operative, clamping, and anastomosis times were 365 min (range: 225–589 min), 86 min (range: 25–205 min), and
41 min (range: 22–110 min), respectively. Total median blood loss was 1,000 ml (range: 100–5,800 ml). Median hospital stay
was 4 days (range: 3–57 days). In this series 16/18 anastomoses were completed with the use of the robotic system. Three patients
were converted (two in group 1, one in group 2), and one patient died postoperatively (group 1). Median clamping and anastomosis
times were significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (111 min [range: 85–205 min] versus 57.5 min [range: 25–130 min],
p < 0.01 and 74 min [range: 40–110 min] versus 36 min [range: 22–69 min], p < 0.01, respectively) Total operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay showed no significant difference between groups
1 and 2.
Conclusions Robot-assisted aortic anastomosis was shown to have a steep learning curve with considerable reduction of clamping and anastomosis
times. However, due to a longer learning curve for laparoscopic dissection of the abdominal aorta, operation times were not
significantly shortened. Even with robotic assistance, laparoscopic aortoiliac surgery remains a complex procedure
Oncologic Long-Term Results of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Thoraco-Laparoscopic Esophagectomy with Two-Field Lymphadenectomy for Esophageal Cancer
Decreasing resection rates for nonmetastatic gastric cancer in Europe and the United States
Background: Resection is the cornerstone of curative treatment for many nonmetastatic gastric cancers (GCs), but the population treatment patterns remains
largely unknown. This large international population-based study aimed at
investigating the treatment patterns and trends for nonmetastatic GC in Europe
and the United States and at exploring factors associated with resection.
Methods: Data of patients with microscopically confirmed primary invasive GC without distant metastasis from the national cancer registries of the
Netherlands, Belgium, Sweden, Norway, Slovenia, and Estonia and the US
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-18 Program were retrieved.
Age-standardized treatment rates were computed and trends were evaluated using linear regression. Associations of resection with patient and tumor characteristics were analyzed using multivariable-adjusted log-binomial regression.
Analysis was performed in each country respectively without pooling.
Results: Together 65 707 nonmetastatic GC patients diagnosed in 2003-2016 were
analyzed. Age-standardized resection rates significantly decreased over years in
all countries (by 4-24%). In 2013-2014, rates varied greatly from 54 to 75%. Patients
with increasing ages, cardia cancers, or cancers invading adjacent structure were
significantly less frequently resected. Resection was further associated with sex,
performance status, comorbidities, tumor histology, tumor size, hospital type,
and hospital volume. Association patterns and strengths varied across countries.
After multivariable adjustment, resection rates remained decreasing (prevalence
ratio = 0.97-0.995 per year), with decreasing trends consistently seen in various
subgroups.
Conclusions: Nonmetastatic GCs were less frequently resected in Europe and
the United States in the early 21st century. Resection rates varied greatly across
countries and appeared not to be optimal. Various factors associated with resection were revealed. Our findings can help to identify differences and possibly
modifiable places in clinical practice and provide important novel references for
designing effective population-based GC management strategies.
∙ In Europe and the United States, nonmetastatic gastric cancers were less frequently resected in the early 21st century.
∙ Resection rates varied greatly across countries and appeared not optimal.
∙ Various factors associated with resection were revealed.
∙ Our findings identify differences and possibly modifiable places in clinical practice and provide important novel references for designing effective
population-based management strategies
The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review
BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) as surgical training tool has become a state-of-the-art technique in training and teaching skills for minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Although intuitively appealing, the true benefits of haptic (VR training) platforms are unknown. Many questions about haptic feedback in the different areas of surgical skills (training) need to be answered before adding costly haptic feedback in VR simulation for MIS training. This study was designed to review the current status and value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted MIS and training by using virtual reality simulation. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken using PubMed and MEDLINE. The following search terms were used: Haptic feedback OR Haptics OR Force feedback AND/OR Minimal Invasive Surgery AND/OR Minimal Access Surgery AND/OR Robotics AND/OR Robotic Surgery AND/OR Endoscopic Surgery AND/OR Virtual Reality AND/OR Simulation OR Surgical Training/Education. RESULTS: The results were assessed according to level of evidence as reflected by the Oxford Centre of Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence. CONCLUSIONS: In the current literature, no firm consensus exists on the importance of haptic feedback in performing minimally invasive surgery. Although the majority of the results show positive assessment of the benefits of force feedback, results are ambivalent and not unanimous on the subject. Benefits are least disputed when related to surgery using robotics, because there is no haptic feedback in currently used robotics. The addition of haptics is believed to reduce surgical errors resulting from a lack of it, especially in knot tying. Little research has been performed in the area of robot-assisted endoscopic surgical training, but results seem promising. Concerning VR training, results indicate that haptic feedback is important during the early phase of psychomotor skill acquisitio
Robotic surgery: disruptive innovation or unfulfilled promise? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the first 30 years
A standardized approach for the thoracic dissection in robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE)
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is increasingly being adopted as the preferred surgical treatment for esophageal cancer, as it is superior to open esophagectomy and a good alternative to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy. This paper addresses the technical details of the thoracoscopic phase of RAMIE, including the operating room set-up, patient positioning, port placement, and surgical steps