14 research outputs found

    Relationship between plasma triiodothyronine concentrations and plasma inorganic iodide concentrations of alligators.

    No full text
    <p>Merritt Island β€Š=β€Š black circles and black line, Lake Woodruff β€Š=β€Š white circles and dotted line, Lake Apopka β€Š=β€Š gray diamonds and gray line. A. Neonates B. Juveniles.</p

    Plasma thyroid hormone concentrations from different sites and life stages of American alligators from Florida.

    No full text
    <p>Merritt Island β€Š=β€Š black, Lake Woodruff β€Š=β€Š white, Lake Apopka β€Š=β€Š gray. Letters represent statistical differences among sites within age groups. Numbers within bars represent sample size. Error bars are Β± SE. A. Mean plasma thyroxine concentrations. B. Mean plasma triiodothyronine concentrations.</p

    Thyroid follicular cell hyperplasia.

    No full text
    <p>Mean proportions of follicular cell layers per thyroid gland of alligators from three sites in Florida. Merritt Island β€Š=β€Š black, Lake Woodruff β€Š=β€Š white, Lake Apopka β€Š=β€Š gray. A. Neonatal alligators. (AP: Nβ€Š=β€Š16; MINWR: Nβ€Š=β€Š11; LWNWR: Nβ€Š=β€Š13) B. Juvenile alligators (Nβ€Š=β€Š18 for all sites). Error bars are Β± SEM. Letters represent significant differences among sites within follicular cell layer classifications.</p

    Thyroid gland histology from neonatal alligators.

    No full text
    <p>Thyroids were rated from 0 to 3 according to hyperplasia severity, hyperplasia area, and hypertrophy. A. All ratings of 1 (mild). B. All ratings of 2 (moderate). C. All ratings of 3 (severe). D. An example of follicular cell involution. F β€Š=β€Š follicular cell, C β€Š=β€Š colloid, L β€Š=β€Š lumen, IN β€Š=β€Š involution.</p

    Growth comparisons of alligators from three sites in Florida.

    No full text
    <p>Merritt Island β€Š=β€Š black circles and black line, Lake Woodruff β€Š=β€Š white circles and dotted line, Lake Apopka β€Š=β€Š gray diamonds and gray line. Letters represent significant differences among sites. Numbers within bars represent sample size. Error bars are Β± SE. A. Snouth-vent length (SVL) measurements at hatching. B. Body mass measurements at hatching. C. Linear regression of body mass growth rates and mean body mass of captive reared juvenile alligators from three central Florida sites. R<sup>2</sup> values were 0.997 for Lake Apopka, 0.993 for Merritt Island, and 0.997 for Lake Woodruff. D. Linear regression of snout-to-vent- length (SVL) growth rates and mean SVL mass of captive reared juvenile alligators from three central Florida sites. R<sup>2</sup> values were 0.705 for Lake Apopka, 0.383 for Merritt Island, and 0.623 for Lake Woodruff respectively. E. Analysis of mean body mass adjusted rate of body mass gain in captive juvenile alligators from three different sites. F. ANCOVA of mean SVL adjusted rate of SVL gain in captive juvenile alligators from Lake Woodruff and Lake Apopka.</p

    Mean classification for thyroid histological markers of American alligators.

    No full text
    *<p>Indicates statistically different from the reference (LWNWR)</p><p>Number in parenthesis is standard error</p

    Examination of Metals from Aerospace-Related Activity in Surface Water Samples from Sites Surrounding the Kennedy Space Center (KSC), Florida

    No full text
    Metal contamination from Space Shuttle launch activity was examined using inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy in a two-tier study sampling surface water collected from several sites at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) and associated Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge in east central Florida. The primary study examined both temporal changes in baseline metal concentrations (19 metals) in surface water (1996 to 2009, 11 sites) samples collected at specific long-term monitoring sites and metal deposition directly associated with Space Shuttle launch activity at two Launch Complexes (LC39A and LC39B). A secondary study examined metal concentrations at additional sites and increased the amount of elements measured to 48 elements. Our examination places a heavy focus on those metals commonly associated with launch operations (e.g., Al, Fe, Mn, and Zn), but a brief discussion of other metals (As, Cu, Mo, Ni, and Pb) is also included. While no observable accumulation of metals occurred during the time period of the study, the data obtained postlaunch demonstrated a dramatic increase for Al, Fe, Mn, and Zn. Comparing overall trends between the primary and secondary baseline surface water concentrations, elevated concentrations were generally observed at sampling stations located near the launch complexes and from sites isolated from major water systems. While there could be several natural and anthropogenic sources for metal deposition at KSC, the data in this report indicate that shuttle launch events are a significant source

    Animal-Borne Imaging Reveals Novel Insights into the Foraging Behaviors and Diel Activity of a Large-Bodied Apex Predator, the American Alligator (<i>Alligator mississippiensis</i>)

    Get PDF
    <div><p>Large-bodied, top- and apex predators (e.g., crocodilians, sharks, wolves, killer whales) can exert strong top-down effects within ecological communities through their interactions with prey. Due to inherent difficulties while studying the behavior of these often dangerous predatory species, relatively little is known regarding their feeding behaviors and activity patterns, information that is essential to understanding their role in regulating food web dynamics and ecological processes. Here we use animal-borne imaging systems (Crittercam) to study the foraging behavior and activity patterns of a cryptic, large-bodied predator, the American alligator (<i>Alligator mississippiensis</i>) in two estuaries of coastal Florida, USA. Using retrieved video data we examine the variation in foraging behaviors and activity patterns due to abiotic factors. We found the frequency of prey-attacks (meanβ€Š=β€Š0.49 prey attacks/hour) as well as the probability of prey-capture success (meanβ€Š=β€Š0.52 per attack) were significantly affected by time of day. Alligators attempted to capture prey most frequently during the night. Probability of prey-capture success per attack was highest during morning hours and sequentially lower during day, night, and sunset, respectively. Position in the water column also significantly affected prey-capture success, as individuals’ experienced two-fold greater success when attacking prey while submerged. These estimates are the first for wild adult American alligators and one of the few examples for any crocodilian species worldwide. More broadly, these results reveal that our understandings of crocodilian foraging behaviors are biased due to previous studies containing limited observations of cryptic and nocturnal foraging interactions. Our results can be used to inform greater understanding regarding the top-down effects of American alligators in estuarine food webs. Additionally, our results highlight the importance and power of using animal-borne imaging when studying the behavior of elusive large-bodied, apex predators, as it provides critical insights into their trophic and behavioral interactions.</p></div
    corecore