Aquilegia, Vol. 30 No. 3, June-July 2006, Newsletter of the Colorado Native Plant Society

https://epublications.regis.edu/aquilegia/1116/thumbnail.jp

A whole earth approach to nature-positive food: biodiversity and agriculture

Agriculture is the largest single source of environmental degradation, responsible for over 30% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, 70% of freshwater use and 80% of land conversion: it is the single largest driver of biodiversity loss (Foley JA, Science 309:570–574, 2005, Nature 478:337–342, 2011; IPBES. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES Secretariat, Bonn, 2019; Willett W et al. The Lancet 393:447–492, 2019). Agriculture also underpins poor human health, contributing to 11 million premature deaths annually. While too many still struggle from acute hunger, a growing number of individuals, including in low to middle-income countries (LMICs), struggle to access healthy foods. Greater consideration for, and integration of, biodiversity in agriculture is a key solution space for improving health, eliminating hunger and achieving nature-positive development objectives. This rapid evidence review documents the best available evidence of agriculture’s relationships with biodiversity, drawing on the contributions of leading biodiversity experts, and recommends actions that can be taken to move towards more biodiversity/nature-positive production through the delivery of integrated agricultural solutions for climate, biodiversity, nutrition and livelihoods. The analysis, which takes a whole-of-food-system approach, brings together a large body of evidence. It accounts for aspects not typically captured in a stand-alone primary piece of research and indicates where there are critical gaps.Fil: Declerck, Fabrice A.J.. The Alliance of Bioversity International and the International Center for Tropical Agriculture ; FranciaFil: Koziell, Izabella T.. The International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development; NepalFil: Benton, Tim. Chatham House; Reino UnidoFil: Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Centro Cientifico Tecnologico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones En Recursos Naturales, Agroecologia y Desarrollo Rural. - Universidad Nacional de Rio Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones En Recursos Naturales, Agroecologia y Desarrollo Rural.; ArgentinaFil: Kremen, Claire. University of British Columbia; CanadáFil: Maron, Martine. University of Queensland; AustraliaFil: Rumbaitis Del Rio, Cristina. World Resources Institute; Estados UnidosFil: Sidhu, Aman. The Alliance of Bioversity International and the International Center for Tropical Agricultura; FranciaFil: Wirths, Jonathan. The Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers ; Sri LankaFil: Clark, Michael. University of Oxford; Reino UnidoFil: Dickens, Chris. International Water Management Institute; Sri LankaFil: Estrada Carmona, Natalia. The Alliance of Bioversity International and the International Center for Tropical Agriculture ; FranciaFil: Fremier, Alexander K.. Washington State University; Estados UnidosFil: Jones, Sarah K.. The Alliance of Bioversity International and the International Center for Tropical Agriculture ; FranciaFil: Khoury, Colin K.. The Alliance of Bioversity International and the International Center for Tropical Agriculture ; FranciaFil: Lal, Rattan. Ohio State University; Estados UnidosFil: Obersteiner, Michael. University of Oxford; Reino UnidoFil: Remans, Roseline. The Alliance of Bioversity International and the International Center for Tropical Agriculture ; FranciaFil: Rusch, Adrien. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique; FranciaFil: Schulte, Lisa A.. Natural Resource Ecology and Management; Estados UnidosFil: Simmonds, Jeremy. University of Queensland; AustraliaFil: Stringer, Lindsay C.. University of York; Reino UnidoFil: Weber, Christopher. World Wide Fund For Nature; Estados UnidosFil: Winowiecki, Leigh. World Agroforestry Center; Keni

Integrating Ecology and Poverty Reduction : Ecological Dimensions

XX, 428 p.online resource

Integrating Ecology and Poverty ReductionThe Application of Ecology in Development Solutions /

XVI, 328 p.online resource

A Blueprint for Digital Climate-Informed Advisory Services: Building the Resilience of 300 Million Small-Scale Producers by 2030

In 2019, nearly 750 million people faced food insecurity, with that number expected to increase in the coming years. Climate change could significantly depress global crop yields, but adaptation efforts could help decrease this risk. The Blueprint for Digital Climate-Informed Advisory Services lays the conceptual foundation for building the climate resilience of at least 300 million small-scale agricultural producers by 2030. Digital climate-informed advisory services (DCAS) are tools and platforms that integrate climate information into agricultural decision-making. These services include digital mobile apps, radio and online platforms, as well as to digitally enabled printed bulletins based on climate models and extension services that use climate information platforms. DCAS can help agricultural producers and other value chain actors build resilience to climate impacts that threaten present and future agri-food systems. Scaling up efforts, while leaving no one behind, is critical to safeguarding the millions of small-scale producers vital to our global food security. This working paper outlines key principles for good practice, explores how to build the resilience of at least 300 million small-holder producers by 2030 and provides a preliminary typology of how to target investments so they reach the most vulnerable and under-resourced. Additionally, it puts forward potential next steps to accelerate growth in this community of practice and increase meaningful investment in these services. The blueprint was created by more than 150 stakeholders organized into three working groups on data quality and governance, equity and co-creation, and financially sustainable business models. These working groups were led by the International Research Institute for Climate and Society at Columbia University, the World Food Programme and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, respectively. In addition to working group reports, the blueprint was developed based on an extensive literature review and expert consultations undertaken by the World Resources Institute and the Global Center on Adaptation

A whole earth approach to nature positive food: biodiversity and agriculture

Agriculture is the largest single source of environmental degradation, responsible for over 30% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, 70% of freshwater use and 80% of land conversion: it is the single largest driver of biodiversity loss (Foley et al. 2011, 2005; IPBES 2019; Willett et al. 2019). Agriculture also underpins poor human health, contributing to 11 million premature deaths annually. While too many still struggle from acute hunger, a growing number of individuals, including in low to middle-income countries (LMICs), struggle to access healthy foods. Greater consideration for, and integration of, biodiversity in agriculture is a key solution space for improving health, eliminating hunger and achieving nature-positive development objectives. This rapid evidence review, documents the best available evidence of agriculture’s relationships with biodiversity, drawing on the contributions of leading biodiversity experts, and recommends actions that can be taken to move towards more biodiversity/nature-positive production through the delivery of integrated agricultural solutions on climate, biodiversity, nutrition and livelihoods. The analysis, which takes a whole-of-food- system approach, brings together a large body of evidence. It accounts for aspects not typically captured in a stand-alone primary piece of research and indicates where there are critical gaps