14 research outputs found

    Fire Regimes and Ecoregions 1 Cumulative Watershed Effects of Fuel Management in the

    Get PDF
    The public land management agencies are phasing in a radically new approach to land management. They are shifting from their focus on individual resources to a more holistic approach of managing whole ecosystems. Fire-excluded systems are prone to changes in composition and density and are susceptible to catastrophic fire and invasio

    Estimates from the multiple linear regression showing the effects of the independent variables on the probability of participation in a syphilis PN program (range 0–1).

    No full text
    <p>Estimates from the multiple linear regression showing the effects of the independent variables on the probability of participation in a syphilis PN program (range 0–1).</p

    Comparison of the mean probability of participation in a syphilis PN program (range 0–1) between infected patient and sex partner of the infected patient participant groups by levels of independent variables.

    No full text
    <p>Comparison of the mean probability of participation in a syphilis PN program (range 0–1) between infected patient and sex partner of the infected patient participant groups by levels of independent variables.</p

    Summarized information of the studies included in meta-analysis.

    No full text
    a<p>The places where the study subjects were recruited.</p>b<p>SBR, snowballing recruitment; RDS, respondent-driven sampling recruitment; IBR, internet-based recruitment; and SNR, social network recruitment.</p>c<p>BED-CEIA, BED capture enzyme immunoassay; RT-PCR, pooled RNA reverse transcription-PCR amplification assay; EIA-WB, enzyme immunoassay screening followed by Western blot confirmation.</p>d<p>(1) and (2) represent different studies from the same article.</p>e<p>(1) and (2) represent different studies from the same first author.</p>f<p>NR, not reported in original paper.</p

    Quality assessment of the studies included in meta-analysis.

    No full text
    <p>Symbol ✓ indicates the measure was adequately addressed in the study; NR = not report; NA = not applicable.</p>a<p>Studies received a ✓ if the sample included all eligible HIV-negative men over a defined time period and defined area, or a random or systematic sample of those men (e.g., RDS);</p>b<p>Studies received a ✓ if the sample size was 456 or more which is the sample size required to estimate the incidence given α = 0.05, δ = 0.02, and expected rate = 5%.</p>c<p>Studies received a ✓ if the percentage participation was 80% or more;</p>d<p>Studies received a ✓ if the outcome (HIV infection) was based on blinded laboratory testing;</p>e<p>Studies received a ✓ if the percentage participants in the final analysis was 80% or more for cross-sectional studies;</p>f<p>Studies received a ✓ if the percentage participants under successful retention when the outcome was evaluated was 70% or more for cohort studies;</p>g<p>Studies received a ✓ if the follow-up duration was 6-month or more for cohort studies;</p>h<p>Studies received a ✓ if the identification of STI was based on laboratory testing rather than self-report.</p>i<p>(1) and (2) represent different studies from the same article.</p>j<p>(1) and (2) represent two different articles from the same first author.</p
    corecore