Deep Brain Stimulation: Current Applications and Future Prospects

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) has proven to be an effective and minimally invasive surgical treatment for a variety of neurological and psychiatric diseases such as Parkinson's Disease, essential tremor, dystonia, Tourette's Syndrome and depression. In contrast to early surgical lesioning procedures, DBS has a considerably lower side-effect rate and is usually reversible. Common targets include nuclei involved in the basal ganglia circuitry as well as its efferent and afferent pathways such as the subthalamic nucleus (STN), the globus pallidus internus (GPi) or the ventral striatal region. Despite the increasing application of DBS, the exact mechanism of action is still matter of debates. Current trials focus on establishing alternative targets, exploring new indications as well as on capturing cortical responses during DBS in order to improve individual stimulation parameters

Applications of radiomics and machine learning for radiotherapy of malignant brain tumors

BackgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and amino acid positron-emission tomography (PET) of the brain contain a vast amount of structural and functional information that can be analyzed by machine learning algorithms and radiomics for the use of radiotherapy in patients with malignant brain tumors.MethodsThis study is based on comprehensive literature research on machine learning and radiomics analyses in neuroimaging and their potential application for radiotherapy in patients with malignant glioma or brain metastases.ResultsFeature-based radiomics and deep learning-based machine learning methods can be used to improve brain tumor diagnostics and automate various steps of radiotherapy planning. In glioma patients, important applications are the determination of WHO grade and molecular markers for integrated diagnosis in patients not eligible for biopsy or resection, automatic image segmentation for target volume planning, prediction of the location of tumor recurrence, and differentiation of pseudoprogression from actual tumor progression. In patients with brain metastases, radiomics is applied for additional detection of smaller brain metastases, accurate segmentation of multiple larger metastases, prediction of local response after radiosurgery, and differentiation of radiation injury from local brain metastasis relapse. Importantly, high diagnostic accuracies of 80–90% can be achieved by most approaches, despite a large variety in terms of applied imaging techniques and computational methods.ConclusionClinical application of automated image analyses based on radiomics and artificial intelligence has a great potential for improving radiotherapy in patients with malignant brain tumors. However, a common problem associated with these techniques is the large variability and the lack of standardization of the methods applied

Differentiation of local tumor recurrence from radiation-induced changes after stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of brain metastasis: case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND: Structural follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases frequently displays local changes in the area of applied irradiation, which are often difficult to interpret (e.g., local tumor recurrence, radiation-induced changes). The use of stereotactic biopsy for histological assessment of these changes has a high diagnostic accuracy and can be considered as method of choice. In order to solve this relevant clinical problem non-invasively, advanced MRI techniques and amino acid positron-emission-tomography (PET) are increasingly used. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the long-term follow-up of a patient who had been treated with linear accelerator based SRS for cerebral metastases of a lung cancer. Fifty-eight months after SRS, the differentiation of local recurrent brain metastasis from radiation-induced changes using structural MRI was difficult. For further differentiation, perfusion-weighted MRI (PWI), proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), and (11)C-methyl-L-methionine (MET) PET was performed. Due to artifacts and technical limitations, PWI MRI and MRS findings were not conclusive. In contrast, MET PET findings were suggestive for radiation-induced changes. Finally, a stereotactic biopsy for histological assessment of these changes demonstrated clearly a radiation-induced necrosis and the absence of vital tumor. CONCLUSION: The use of stereotactic biopsy for histological assessment of indistinguishable lesions on structural MRI after SRS for treatment of brain metastasis represents a highly reliable method to differentiate local tumor recurrence from radiation-induced changes. In this field, results of studies with both advanced MRI techniques and amino acid PET suggest encouraging results. However, artifacts and technical limitations (e.g., lesion size) are still a problem and comparative studies are needed to investigate the relationship, diagnostic performance, and complementary character of advanced MRI techniques and amino acid PET

Update on the diagnostic value and safety of stereotactic biopsy for pediatric brainstem tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 735 cases

OBJECTIVE Recent studies have shed light on the molecular makeup of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas and led to the identification of potential treatment targets for these lesions, which account for the majority of pediatric brainstem tumors (pedBSTs). Therefore, stereotactic biopsy driven molecular characterization of pedBSTs may become an important prerequisite for the management of these fatal brain tumors. The authors conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis to precisely determine the safety and diagnostic success of stereotactic biopsy of pedBSTs. METHODS A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Web of Science yielded 944 potentially eligible abstracts. Meta-analysis was conducted on 18 studies (including the authors' own institutional series), describing a total of 735 biopsy procedures for pedBSTs. The primary outcome measures were diagnostic success and procedure-related complications. Pooled estimates were calculated based on the Freeman-Tukey double-arcsine transformation and DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Heterogeneity, sensitivity, and meta-regression analyses were also conducted. RESULTS The weighted average proportions across the analyzed studies were 96.1% (95% CI 93.5%-98.1%) for diagnostic success, 6.7% (95% CI 4.2%-9.6%) for overall morbidity, 0.6% (95% CI 0.2%-1.4%) for permanent morbidity, and 0.6% (95% CI 0.2%-1.3%) for mortality. Subgroup analyses at the study level identified no significant correlation between the outcome measures and the distribution of the chosen biopsy trajectories (transfrontal vs transcerebellar), age, year of publication, or the number of biopsy procedures annually performed in each center. CONCLUSION Stereotactic biopsy of pedBSTs is safe and allows successful tissue sampling as a prerequisite for the molecular characterization and the identification of potentially druggable targets toward more individualized treatment concepts to improve the outcome for children harboring such lesions

Stereotactic biopsy combined with stereotactic (125)iodine brachytherapy for diagnosis and treatment of locally recurrent single brain metastases

This paper reports on stereotactic biopsy combined with stereotactic 125 iodine brachytherapy (SBT) for locally recurrent, previously irradiated cerebral metastases, focusing on feasibility, complications, cerebral disease control, and survival. All patients with suspected locally recurrent metastases detected by MRI were selected for this combined procedure. After stereotactic biopsy, all patients with a verified vital tumor underwent SBT (50 Gy surface dose applied for 42 days) during the same surgical procedure. Histological results of biopsy, complications, treatment response, local and distant disease control, and survival were evaluated. Thirty patients underwent stereotactic biopsy, and 27 were treated with SBT for histologically proved tumor recurrence. There was no treatmen-trelated mortality, and morbidity was transient and low (6.6%). Median survival was 14.8 months. After one year the actuarial incidence of local and distant relapse was 6.7 and 45.5%, respectively. There was no grade 3 or 4 CNS toxicity, even among the 18.5% of patients with tumor >30 mm. For these patients stereotactic biopsy seems to be a safe and valuable means of differentiating between radiation-induced tissue changes and tumor recurrence/progression. SBT is a safe, minimally invasive, and highly effective treatment option for cerebral disease control and survival. Furthermore, it can be performed during the same stereotactic operation