Intensive follo w-up after liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: results of combined serial tumour marker estimations and computed tomography of the chest and abdomen – a prospective study

The aim of the study was to prospectively evaluate an intensive follow-up programme using serial tumour marker estimations and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the chest and abdomen in patients undergoing potentially curative resection of colorectal liver metastases. Seventy-six consecutive patients having undergone potentially curative resections of colorectal liver metastases in a single unit were followed up with a protocol of 3 monthly carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 estimations and contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the chest, abdomen and pelvis for the first 2 years following surgery and 6 monthly thereafter. The median period of follow-up was 24 months (range 18–60). Recurrent tumour was classed as early if within 6 months of liver resection. Thirty-seven of the 76 patients (49%) developed recurrence on follow-up. Nineteen recurrences were in the liver alone (51%), 16 liver and extrahepatic (43%) and two extrahepatic alone (6%). Of the 19 patients with isolated liver recurrence, eight developed within 6 months of liver resection none of which were resectable. Of the 11 recurrences after 6 months, five (45%) were resectable. Of the 37 recurrences, CT indicated recurrence despite normal tumour markers in 19 patients. Tumour markers suggested recurrence before imaging in 12 and concurrently with imaging in 6. In the 12 patients who presented with elevated tumour markers before imaging, there was a median lag period of 3 months (range 1–21) in recurrence being detected on further serial imaging. Seventeen patients who developed recurrence had normal tumour markers before initial resection of their liver metastases. Of these 17, 10 (58%) had an elevation of tumour markers associated with recurrence. Over a median follow-up of 2 years following liver resection, the use of CT or tumour markers alone would have failed to demonstrate early recurrence in 12 and 18 patients respectively. A combination of tumour markers and CT detected significantly more (P<0.05) recurrence than either modality alone. Tumour markers and CT should be used in combination in the follow-up of patients with resected colorectal liver metatases, including patients whose markers are normal at the time of initial liver resection

Resection of liver metastases in patients with breast cancer: Survival and prognostic factors

Aims: Patients with breast cancer metastasized to the liver have a median survival of 4-33 months and treatment options are usually restricted to palliative systemic therapy. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of resection of liver metastases from breast cancer and to identify prognostic factors for overall survival. Methods: Patients were identified using the national registry of histo- and cytopathology in the Netherlands (PALGA). Included were all patients who underwent resection of liver metastases from breast cancer in 11 hospitals in The Netherlands of the last 20 years. Study data were retrospectively collected from patient files. Results: A total of 32 female patients were identified. Intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in 3 and 11 patients, respectively. There was no postoperative mortality. After a median follow up period of 26 months (range, 0-188), 5-year and median overall survival after partial liver resection was 37% and 55 months, respectively. The 5-year disease-free survival was 19% with a median time to recurrence of 11 months. Solitary metastases were the only independent significant progn Conclusion: Resection of liver metastases from breast cancer is safe and might provide a survival benefit in a selected group of patients. Especially in patients with solitary liver metastasis, the option of surgery in the multimodality management of patients with disseminated breast cancer should be considered. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

Outcomes of Resectability Assessment of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group Liver Metastases Expert Panel

BACKGROUND: Decision making on optimal treatment strategy in patients with initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) remains complex because uniform criteria for (un) resectability are lacking. This study reports on the feasibility and short-term outcomes of The Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group Liver Expert Panel. STUDY DESIGN: The Expert Panel consists of 13 hepatobiliary surgeons and 4 radiologists. Resectability assessment is performed independently by 3 randomly assigned surgeons, and CRLM are scored as resectable, potentially resectable, or permanently unresectable. In absence of consensus, 2 additional surgeons are invited for a majority consensus. Patients with potentially resectable or unresectable CRLM at baseline are evaluated every 2 months of systemic therapy. Once CRLM are considered resectable, a treatment strategy is proposed. RESULTS: Overall, 398 panel evaluations in 183 patients were analyzed. The median time to panel conclusion was 7 days (interquartile range [IQR] 5-11 days). Intersurgeon disagreement was observed in 205 (52%) evaluations, with major disagreement (resectable vs permanently unresectable) in 42 (11%) evaluations. After systemic treatment, 106 patients were considered to have resectable CRLM, 84 of whom (79%) underwent a curative procedure. R0 resection (n = 41), R0 resection in combination with ablative treatment (n = 26), or ablative treatment only (n = 4) was achieved in 67 of 84 (80%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study analyzed prospective resectability evaluation of patients with CRLM by a panel of radiologists and liver surgeons. The high rate of disagreement among experienced liver surgeons reflects the complexity in defining treatment strategies for CRLM and supports the use of a panel rather than a single-surgeon decision. (C) 2019 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved

Progressive loss of endothelial P-selectin expression with increasing malignancy in colorectal cancer.

Contains fulltext : 47950.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)Adhesion of inflammatory cells to vascular endothelium is mediated by specific cell adhesion receptors on both leukocytes and endothelial cells. One of the adhesion molecules on the endothelium is P-selectin. Decreased vascular P-selectin expression has been associated with tumor progression in melanoma patients. We now report on the expression of endothelial P-selectin in colorectal cancer (CRC). We studied a colorectal tissue specimen series ranging from normal colorectal tissue via unmetastasized primary tumors to tumors with the same depth of invasion at the primary site but with liver metastases. Moreover, P-selectin expression levels in liver metastases were determined. The number of P-selectin positive vessels as a fraction of the total number of vessels, both intra- and peritumorally, was determined by staining for CD62P and CD34, respectively. Furthermore, by immunostaining for leukocytes (CD45) and macrophages (CD68), it was evaluated whether levels of P-selectin expression influenced infiltrate density and composition. The results showed that levels of peritumoral P-selectin expression were reciprocal to the degree of progression in CRC. This relation was even more pronounced intratumorally: in metastasized primary tumors and in the metastatic lesions, P-selectin expression was virtually absent. This distribution pattern was reflected in the numbers of leukocytes that accumulated in the various tissues, since in the primary tumors with metastases, and in the metastatic lesions, hardly any infiltrating cells were observed. In these lesions, leukocytes were present in the peritumoral zone, but seemed unable to enter the tumor tissue. In primary tumors without metastasis, the intratumoral leukocyte infiltration density was significantly higher. Recruitment levels of macrophages remained constant throughout the different tissues. We suggest that downregulation of endothelial P-selectin expression is a mechanism by which CRC lesions evade inflammatory regression and, thereby, progress to a more advanced stage of malignancy