Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Resection of a Todani Type II Choledochal Malformation

Choledochal malformation (CM) comprise various congenital cystic dilatations of the extrahepatic and/or intrahepatic biliary tree. CM is classified into five different types. Our case describes a 58-year-old man presenting with acute abdominal pain. Further examination showed a Todani type II CM. Treatment for type II is complete cyst excision without the need for an extrahepatic bile duct resection. A robot-assisted laparoscopic resection of the CM was performed and the patient recovered without complications. Pathology results showed a Todani type II malformation in which complete squamous metaplasia has occurred. In this paper, we report, to the best of our knowledge, the first description of a robot-assisted laparoscopic resection of a type II CM

Sequential Hypothermic and Normothermic Machine Perfusion Enables Safe Transplantation of High-risk Donor Livers

Ex situ normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) is increasingly used for viability assessment of high-risk donor livers, whereas dual hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (DHOPE) reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury. We aimed to resuscitate and test the viability of initially-discarded, high-risk donor livers using sequential DHOPE and NMP with two different oxygen carriers: an artificial hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier (HBOC) or red blood cells (RBC). In a prospective observational cohort study of 54 livers that underwent DHOPE-NMP, the first 18 procedures were performed with a HBOC-based perfusion solution and the subsequent 36 procedures were performed with an RBC-based perfusion solution for the NMP phase. All but one livers were derived from extended criteria donation after circulatory death donors, with a median donor risk index of 2.84 (IQR 2.52-3.11). After functional assessment during NMP, 34 livers (63% utilization), met the viability criteria and were transplanted. One-year graft and patient survival were 94% and 100%, respectively. Post-transplant cholangiopathy occurred in 1 patient (3%). There were no significant differences in utilization rate and post-transplant outcomes between the HBOC and RBC group. Ex situ machine perfusion using sequential DHOPE-NMP for resuscitation and viability assessment of high-risk donor livers results in excellent transplant outcomes, irrespective of the oxygen carrier used

Choledochal Malformation in Children: Lessons Learned from a Dutch National Study

Introduction: A choledochal malformation (CM) is a rare entity, especially in the Western world. We aimed to determine the incidence of CM in the Netherlands and the outcome of surgery for CM in childhood. Methods: All pediatric patients who underwent a surgical procedure for type I–IV CM between 1989 and 2014 were entered into the Netherlands Study group on choledochal cyst/malformation. Patients with type V CM were excluded from the present analysis. Symptoms, surgical details, short-term (30 days) complications were studied retrospectively. Results: Between January 1989 and December 2014, 91 pediatric patients underwent surgery for CM at a median age of 2.1 years (0.0–17.7 years). All patients underwent resection of the extrahepatic biliary tree with restoration of the continuity via Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Twelve patients (12%) were operated laparoscopically. Short-term complications, mainly biliary leakage and cholangitis, occurred in 20 patients (22%), without significant correlations with weight or age at surgery or surgical approach. Long-term postoperative complications were mainly cholangitis (13%) and anastomotic stricture (4%). Eight patients (9%) required radiological intervention or additional surgery. Surgery before 1 year of age (OR 9.3) and laparoscopic surgery (OR 4.4) were associated with more postoperative long-term complications. We did not observe biliary malignancies during treatment or follow-up. Conclusion: Surgery for CM carries a significant short- and long-term morbidity. Given the low incidence, we would suggest that (laparoscopic) hepatobiliary surgery for CM should be performed in specialized pediatric surgical centers with a wide experience in laparoscopy and hepatobiliary surgery

Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for resectable pancreatic cancer (DIPLOMA):an international randomised non-inferiority trial

Background: The oncological safety of minimally invasive surgery has been questioned for several abdominal cancers. Concerns also exist regarding the use of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer as randomised trials are lacking. Methods: In this international randomised non-inferiority trial, we recruited adults with resectable pancreatic cancer from 35 centres in 12 countries. Patients were randomly assigned to either MIDP (laparoscopic or robotic) or open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). Both patients and pathologists were blinded to the assigned approach. Primary endpoint was radical resection (R0, ≥1 mm free margin) in patients who had ultimately undergone resection. Analyses for the primary endpoint were by modified intention-to-treat, excluding patients with missing data on primary endpoint. The pre-defined non-inferiority margin of −7% was compared with the lower limit of the two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) of absolute difference in the primary endpoint. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN44897265). Findings: Between May 8, 2018 and May 7, 2021, 258 patients were randomly assigned to MIDP (131 patients) or ODP (127 patients). Modified intention-to-treat analysis included 114 patients in the MIDP group and 110 patients in the ODP group. An R0 resection occurred in 83 (73%) patients in the MIDP group and in 76 (69%) patients in the ODP group (difference 3.7%, 90% CI −6.2 to 13.6%; pnon-inferiority = 0.039). Median lymph node yield was comparable (22.0 [16.0–30.0] vs 23.0 [14.0–32.0] nodes, p = 0.86), as was the rate of intraperitoneal recurrence (41% vs 38%, p = 0.45). Median follow-up was 23.5 (interquartile range 17.0–30.0) months. Other postoperative outcomes were comparable, including median time to functional recovery (5 [95% CI 4.5–5.5] vs 5 [95% CI 4.7–5.3] days; p = 0.22) and overall survival (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.67–1.46, p = 0.94). Serious adverse events were reported in 23 (18%) of 131 patients in the MIDP group vs 28 (22%) of 127 patients in the ODP group. Interpretation: This trial provides evidence on the non-inferiority of MIDP compared to ODP regarding radical resection rates in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. The present findings support the applicability of minimally invasive surgery in patients with resectable left-sided pancreatic cancer. Funding: Medtronic Covidien AG, Johnson &amp; Johnson Medical Limited, Dutch Gastroenterology Society.</p

Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for resectable pancreatic cancer (DIPLOMA):an international randomised non-inferiority trial

Background: The oncological safety of minimally invasive surgery has been questioned for several abdominal cancers. Concerns also exist regarding the use of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer as randomised trials are lacking. Methods: In this international randomised non-inferiority trial, we recruited adults with resectable pancreatic cancer from 35 centres in 12 countries. Patients were randomly assigned to either MIDP (laparoscopic or robotic) or open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). Both patients and pathologists were blinded to the assigned approach. Primary endpoint was radical resection (R0, ≥1 mm free margin) in patients who had ultimately undergone resection. Analyses for the primary endpoint were by modified intention-to-treat, excluding patients with missing data on primary endpoint. The pre-defined non-inferiority margin of −7% was compared with the lower limit of the two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) of absolute difference in the primary endpoint. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN44897265). Findings: Between May 8, 2018 and May 7, 2021, 258 patients were randomly assigned to MIDP (131 patients) or ODP (127 patients). Modified intention-to-treat analysis included 114 patients in the MIDP group and 110 patients in the ODP group. An R0 resection occurred in 83 (73%) patients in the MIDP group and in 76 (69%) patients in the ODP group (difference 3.7%, 90% CI −6.2 to 13.6%; pnon-inferiority = 0.039). Median lymph node yield was comparable (22.0 [16.0–30.0] vs 23.0 [14.0–32.0] nodes, p = 0.86), as was the rate of intraperitoneal recurrence (41% vs 38%, p = 0.45). Median follow-up was 23.5 (interquartile range 17.0–30.0) months. Other postoperative outcomes were comparable, including median time to functional recovery (5 [95% CI 4.5–5.5] vs 5 [95% CI 4.7–5.3] days; p = 0.22) and overall survival (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.67–1.46, p = 0.94). Serious adverse events were reported in 23 (18%) of 131 patients in the MIDP group vs 28 (22%) of 127 patients in the ODP group. Interpretation: This trial provides evidence on the non-inferiority of MIDP compared to ODP regarding radical resection rates in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. The present findings support the applicability of minimally invasive surgery in patients with resectable left-sided pancreatic cancer. Funding: Medtronic Covidien AG, Johnson &amp; Johnson Medical Limited, Dutch Gastroenterology Society.</p

Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for resectable pancreatic cancer (DIPLOMA):an international randomised non-inferiority trial

Background: The oncological safety of minimally invasive surgery has been questioned for several abdominal cancers. Concerns also exist regarding the use of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer as randomised trials are lacking. Methods: In this international randomised non-inferiority trial, we recruited adults with resectable pancreatic cancer from 35 centres in 12 countries. Patients were randomly assigned to either MIDP (laparoscopic or robotic) or open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). Both patients and pathologists were blinded to the assigned approach. Primary endpoint was radical resection (R0, ≥1 mm free margin) in patients who had ultimately undergone resection. Analyses for the primary endpoint were by modified intention-to-treat, excluding patients with missing data on primary endpoint. The pre-defined non-inferiority margin of −7% was compared with the lower limit of the two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) of absolute difference in the primary endpoint. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN44897265). Findings: Between May 8, 2018 and May 7, 2021, 258 patients were randomly assigned to MIDP (131 patients) or ODP (127 patients). Modified intention-to-treat analysis included 114 patients in the MIDP group and 110 patients in the ODP group. An R0 resection occurred in 83 (73%) patients in the MIDP group and in 76 (69%) patients in the ODP group (difference 3.7%, 90% CI −6.2 to 13.6%; pnon-inferiority = 0.039). Median lymph node yield was comparable (22.0 [16.0–30.0] vs 23.0 [14.0–32.0] nodes, p = 0.86), as was the rate of intraperitoneal recurrence (41% vs 38%, p = 0.45). Median follow-up was 23.5 (interquartile range 17.0–30.0) months. Other postoperative outcomes were comparable, including median time to functional recovery (5 [95% CI 4.5–5.5] vs 5 [95% CI 4.7–5.3] days; p = 0.22) and overall survival (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.67–1.46, p = 0.94). Serious adverse events were reported in 23 (18%) of 131 patients in the MIDP group vs 28 (22%) of 127 patients in the ODP group. Interpretation: This trial provides evidence on the non-inferiority of MIDP compared to ODP regarding radical resection rates in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. The present findings support the applicability of minimally invasive surgery in patients with resectable left-sided pancreatic cancer. Funding: Medtronic Covidien AG, Johnson &amp; Johnson Medical Limited, Dutch Gastroenterology Society.</p

Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for resectable pancreatic cancer (DIPLOMA):an international randomised non-inferiority trial

Background: The oncological safety of minimally invasive surgery has been questioned for several abdominal cancers. Concerns also exist regarding the use of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer as randomised trials are lacking. Methods: In this international randomised non-inferiority trial, we recruited adults with resectable pancreatic cancer from 35 centres in 12 countries. Patients were randomly assigned to either MIDP (laparoscopic or robotic) or open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). Both patients and pathologists were blinded to the assigned approach. Primary endpoint was radical resection (R0, ≥1 mm free margin) in patients who had ultimately undergone resection. Analyses for the primary endpoint were by modified intention-to-treat, excluding patients with missing data on primary endpoint. The pre-defined non-inferiority margin of −7% was compared with the lower limit of the two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) of absolute difference in the primary endpoint. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN44897265). Findings: Between May 8, 2018 and May 7, 2021, 258 patients were randomly assigned to MIDP (131 patients) or ODP (127 patients). Modified intention-to-treat analysis included 114 patients in the MIDP group and 110 patients in the ODP group. An R0 resection occurred in 83 (73%) patients in the MIDP group and in 76 (69%) patients in the ODP group (difference 3.7%, 90% CI −6.2 to 13.6%; pnon-inferiority = 0.039). Median lymph node yield was comparable (22.0 [16.0–30.0] vs 23.0 [14.0–32.0] nodes, p = 0.86), as was the rate of intraperitoneal recurrence (41% vs 38%, p = 0.45). Median follow-up was 23.5 (interquartile range 17.0–30.0) months. Other postoperative outcomes were comparable, including median time to functional recovery (5 [95% CI 4.5–5.5] vs 5 [95% CI 4.7–5.3] days; p = 0.22) and overall survival (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.67–1.46, p = 0.94). Serious adverse events were reported in 23 (18%) of 131 patients in the MIDP group vs 28 (22%) of 127 patients in the ODP group. Interpretation: This trial provides evidence on the non-inferiority of MIDP compared to ODP regarding radical resection rates in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. The present findings support the applicability of minimally invasive surgery in patients with resectable left-sided pancreatic cancer. Funding: Medtronic Covidien AG, Johnson &amp; Johnson Medical Limited, Dutch Gastroenterology Society.</p

Reversal of secondary protein-losing enteropathy after surgical revision of a jejunal Roux-en-Y loop in a patient after liver transplantation

Secondary protein-losing enteropathy (PLE) is a rare complication following pediatric liver transplantation (LT), mostly related to venous outflow obstruction of the liver. Here, we discuss a thus far unknown cause of secondary PLE following pediatric LT. A 7-month-old boy underwent LT with biliary anastomosis using a Roux-en-Y jejunal loop. Eleven months later he developed PLE. Routine diagnostic workup was negative. No hepatic outflow obstruction was detected during catheterization. Although the hepatic venous pressure gradient was slightly increased (10 mm Hg), there were no clinical signs of portal hypertension. Albumin scintigraphy with specific early recordings suggested focal albumin intestinal entry in the jejunal Roux-en-Y loop. Local bacterial overgrowth or local lymphangiectasia, possibly due to (venous) congestion, was considered. Treatment with metronidazole did not improve albumin loss. Next, surgical revision of the jejunal Roux-en-Y loop was performed. The explanted loop contained a small abnormal area with a thin hyperemic mucosa, near the former anastomosis. Histopathological analysis showed changes both in the blood vessels and the lymphatic vessels with focal deeper chronic active inflammation resulting in congestion of vessels, hampering lymphatic outflow leading to lymphangiectasia and patchy distortion of lymphatic vessels. Following surgical revision, secondary PLE disappeared, up to now, 1.5 year post revision

Característica do ambiente comunitário nos níveis de atividade física de adolescentes de Curitiba, PR

Orientador : Prof. Dr. Rodrigo Siqueira ReisDissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Federal do Paraná, Setor de Ciências Biológicas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação Física. Defesa: Curitiba, 24/02/2017Inclui referências : f. 108-114Resumo: RESUMO As características ambientais tem se mostrado relacionadas aos hábitos da prática de atividade física da população. Grande parte da população mundial de adolescentes não atinge os níveis recomendados de atividade física. Recentemente tem sido estudado como as características ambientais podem auxiliar na melhoria destes indicadores. No entanto, a maior parte das evidências na literatura são de países de renda elevada, o que não permite representar as características de países de renda baixa e média. Além disso, as medidas são comumente avaliadas por Sistemas de Informações Geográficas. Mensurar as características ambientais a nível de microescala podem permitir compreender melhor as características do ambiente e a prática de atividade física e proporcionar mudanças com menor custo e maior rapidez. Portanto, o objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a associação entre atributos físicos do ambiente construído capturados pela microescala e atividade física de adolescentes de Curitiba-PR, Brasil. Os dados são oriundos de dois projetos, IPEN Adolescent (Projeto ESPAÇOS) e MAPS Global, caracterizados estudos de delineamento transversal. Foram selecionados apenas adolescentes que apresentaram informações de acelerômetro e/ou GPS válidas (n=356). Os dados da prática dos deslocamentos para a escola e pelo bairro foram autoreportados e a atividade física moderada a vigorosa obtida com dados coletados por meio de acelerômetros. As informações do ambiente construído a nível de microescala foram coletadas no projeto MAPS Global por meio de observação sistemática. As rotas avaliadas pela rede de ruas, possuíam, no mínimo 400 metros e, no máximo, 720 metros a partir da residência do adolescente até um conglomerado comercial mais próximo, distribuídas em quatro quadrantes da combinação de walkability e renda do bairro. Locais de alto walkability se mostraram positivos com a presença de locais comerciais, estética e qualidade das calçadas. O contexto da atividade física do deslocamento, para a escola ou de lazer, se mostraram associadas com a presença de características de locais não residenciais e melhor qualidade dos segmentos e de forma inversa para transportes motorizados. A atividade física moderada à vigorosa se mostrou associada apenas com a presença de "semáforos". Conclui-se que as características do bairro a nível de microescala são mais importantes para o deslocamento do que atividades de maior intensidade, que aparentemente são realizadas em locais mais específicos. Estudos com amostra representativa de adolescentes e do entorno das residências devem ser desenvolvidos para identificar as reais condições da cidade e quais domínios da atividade física podem ser associados com a microescala. Palavras-chave: Atividade motora, ambiente construído, adolescenteAbstract:Environmental characteristics showed related to the habits of the physical activity of the population. Most of the adolescents' population does not reach recommended levels of physical activity. Recently has been studied how the environmental characteristics can help to improve of these indicators. However, most of the evidence in the literature is from high-income countries, which does not allow us to represent the characteristics of low- and middle-income countries. In addition, the measurements are commonly evaluated by Geographic Information Systems (GIS). Measuring the environmental characteristics at the microscale can allow better understanding of the characteristics of the environment and the practice of physical activity and provide changes with lower costs and faster. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the association between physical attributes of the built environment captured by the microscale and physical activity of adolescents from Curitiba-PR, Brazil. The data come from two projects, IPEN Adolescent (Projeto ESPAÇOS) and MAPS Global, characterized as cross-sectional design. Only adolescents presenting valid accelerometer and / or GPS information (n=356) were selected. The data of the practice of the trips to the school and the neighborhood were self-reported and the moderate to vigorous physical activity obtained with data collected through accelerometers. Information on the environment built at the microscale level collected in the MAPS Global project through systematic observation. The routes evaluated by the street network had at least 400 meters and a maximum of 720 meters from the adolescent's residence to a nearby commercial cluster, distributed in four quadrants of the combination of walkability and income. Places of high walkability were positive with the presence of commercial sites, aesthetics and quality of the sidewalks. The context of the physical activity of the displacement, for the school or of leisure, showed to be associated with the presence of characteristics of non-residential places and better quality of the segments and of inverse form for motorized transports. Moderate to vigorous physical activity was associated only with the presence of traffic lights. Characteristics of the neighborhood at the microscale level are more important for commuting than activities of greater intensity, which apparently are performed in specific places. Studies with a representative sample of adolescents and the surroundings of the residences to identify the real conditions of the city and which domains of physical activity can be associated with the microscale. Keywords: Motor activity, built environment, adolescen