Überwindung der ABC-Transporter-vermittelten Chemoresistenz in Neuroblastomzellen

Im ersten Teil dieser Arbeit wurde der Einfluss des HIV-Protease-Inhibitors Saquinavir und seines Derivates Saquinavir-NO auf die ABC-Transporter vermittelte Chemoresistenz in Tumorzellen untersucht. Saquinavir-NO zeigte in drei verschiedenen Tumorentitäten stärkere zytotoxische Wirkung als Saquinavir. Weder die Expression der ABC-Transporter MDR1 oder BCRP1 noch der zelluläre p53-Status hatten einen Einfluss auf die Zellsensitivität. MDR1-exprimierende chemoresistente Tumorzellen wurden durch Saquinavir-NO stärker gegen ausgewählte Zytostatika resensitiviert als durch Saquinavir. An chemosensitiven MDR1-negativen Zellen wurden keine Effekte beobachtet. Des Weiteren wurde die Neuroblastomzelllinie UKF-NB-3 mit Hilfe lentiviraler Vektoren mit cDNA für MDR1 transduziert. In diesem MDR1-transduzierten Zellmodell wurde die Sensiti-vität gegen das MDR1-Substrat Vincristin durch Saquinavir-NO stärker erhöht als durch Saquinavir. Am Durchflusszytometer wurde der Einfluss von Saquinavir und Saquinavir-NO auf die intrazelluläre Akkumulation des fluoreszierenden MDR1-Substrates Rhodamin 123 untersucht. In MDR1-exprimierenden Zelllinien führte Saquinavir-NO zu einer deutlich stärkeren Akkumulation von Rhodamin 123 als Saquinavir. In MDR1-negativen Zellen wurden keine Effekte beobachtet. Mit Hilfe des MDR1-ATPase-Assays und Wash-Out-Kinetiken am Durchflusszytometer wurde die Frage geklärt, ob Saquinavir und Saquinavir-NO als Substrate oder als allosterische Inhibitoren für MDR1 fungieren. Die Ergebnisse beider Assays lassen den Schluss zu, dass sowohl Saquinavir als auch Saquinavir-NO jeweils ein Substrat für MDR1 darstellen. Um den Einfluss von Saquinavir und Saquinavir-NO auf den ABC-Transporter BCRP1 zu untersuchen, wurde die Neuroblastomzelllinie UKF-NB-3 mit Hilfe lentiviraler Vektoren mit cDNA für BCRP1 transduziert. Die BCRP1-transduzierten Zellen wurden durch Saquinavir und Saquinavir-NO in vergleichbarem Ausmaß zu dem BCRP1-Substrat Mitoxantron sensibilisiert. Saquinavir-NO ist somit im Vergleich zu Saquinavir der deutlich potentere MDR1-Inhibitor, während beide Substanzen gleichermaßen BCRP1 beeinflussten. Im zweiten Teil dieser Arbeit wurde der Einfluss des MDM2-Inhibitors Nutlin-3 auf die ABC-Transporter-vermittelte Chemoresistenz in Tumorzellen untersucht. Nutlin-3 zeigte aufgrund seiner Funktion als MDM2-Inhibitor an Zellen mit Wildtyp-p53 stark zytotoxische Effekte. An Zellen mit einer p53-Mutation oder an Zellen, die p53-negativ sind, waren diese Effekte nicht zu beobachten. Die Behandlung mit Nutlin-3 führte in p53-Wildtypzellen zur Induktion diverser p53-Zielgene (p21, MDM2, GADD). In Zellen mit mutiertem p53 blieb diese Induktion nach Nutlin-3-Behandlung aus. Chemoresistente MDR1-exprimierende Tumorzellen wurden durch Nutlin-3 stark gegen ausgesuchte Zytostatika resensitiviert. Des Weiteren wurde die chemosensitive, p53-mutierte (Nutlin-3-insensitive) und MDR1-negative Rhabdomyosarkomzelllinie RH30 mit Hilfe lentiviraler Vektoren mit cDNA für MDR1 transduziert. In diesem MDR1-transduzierten Zellmodell wurde die Sensitivität gegen das MDR1-Substrat Vincristin durch Nutlin-3 stark erhöht. Am Durchflusszytomter zeigte sich in MDR1-exprimierenden Zellen durch Behandlung mit Nutlin-3 eine signifikant erhöhte intrazelluläre Akkumulation des fluoreszierenden MDR1-Substrates Rhodamin 123. In MDR1-negativen Zellen wurde dieser Effekt nicht beobachtet. Mit Hilfe des ATPase-Assays und Wash-Out-Kinetiken am Durchflusszytometer wurde die Frage geklärt, ob Nutlin-3 als Substrat oder als allosterischer Inhibitor für MDR1 fungiert. Die Ergebnisse beider Assays lassen den Schluss zu, dass Nutlin-3 ein Substrat für MDR1 darstellt. Nutlin-3 ist ein Racemat und wurde in allen Versuchen als solches verwendet. Das Enantiomer Nutlin-3a hemmt die MDM2-p53-Interaktion als aktives Enantiomer ca. 150-fach stärker als Nutlin-3b. Im letzten Schritt der vorliegenden Arbeit wurde Nutlin-3 in seine Enantiomere Nutlin-3a und Nutlin-3b aufgetrennt und beide Enantiomere wurden im Hinblick auf ihre Wirkung auf MDR1 untersucht. Dabei wurden keine Unterschiede zwischen den beiden Enantiomeren festgestellt. Nutlin-3a und Nutlin-3b interferieren demnach zu gleichen Teilen mit MDR1. Um den Einfluss von Nutlin-3 auf den ABC-Transporter MRP1 zu untersuchen, wurde mit zwei verschiedenen Zellmodellen gearbeitet. In beiden Zellmodellen zeigte sich, dass Nutlin-3 auch den MRP1-vermittelten Efflux der fluoreszierenden Substrate Rhodamin 123 und Calcein-AM inhibiert. Der Befund, dass Nutlin-3 mit der MDR1- und MRP1 vermittelten Chemoresistenz interferiert, ist neu und eine wichtige Information für die Bewertung der beginnenden klinischen Studien zur Untersuchung von Nutlin-3 als antitumorale Substanz

Enzastaurin inhibits ABCB1-mediated drug efflux independently of effects on protein kinase C signalling and the cellular p53 status

The PKCβ inhibitor enzastaurin was tested in parental neuroblastoma and rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines, their vincristine-resistant sub-lines, primary neuroblastoma cells, ABCB1-transduced, ABCG2-transduced, and p53-depleted cells. Enzastaurin IC50s ranged from 3.3 to 9.5 μM in cell lines and primary cells independently of the ABCB1, ABCG2, or p53 status. Enzastaurin 0.3125 μM interfered with ABCB1-mediated drug transport. PKCα and PKCβ may phosphorylate and activate ABCB1 under the control of p53. However, enzastaurin exerted similar effects on ABCB1 in the presence or absence of functional p53. Also, enzastaurin inhibited PKC signalling only in concentrations ≥ 1.25 μM. The investigated cell lines did not express PKCβ. PKCα depletion reduced PKC signalling but did not affect ABCB1 activity. Intracellular levels of the fluorescent ABCB1 substrate rhodamine 123 rapidly decreased after wash-out of extracellular enzastaurin, and enzastaurin induced ABCB1 ATPase activity resembling the ABCB1 substrate verapamil. Computational docking experiments detected a direct interaction of enzastaurin and ABCB1. These data suggest that enzastaurin directly interferes with ABCB1 function. Enzastaurin further inhibited ABCG2-mediated drug transport but by a different mechanism since it reduced ABCG2 ATPase activity. These findings are important for the further development of therapies combining enzastaurin with ABC transporter substrates

Correlation from undiluted vitreous cytokines of untreated central retinal vein occlusion with spectral domain optical coherence tomography

Purpose: To correlate inflammatory and proangiogenic key cytokines from undiluted vitreous of treatment-naïve central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) patients with SD-OCT parameters. Methods: Thirty-five patients (age 71.1 years, 24 phakic, 30 nonischemic) underwent intravitreal combination therapy, including a single-site 23-gauge core vitrectomy. Twenty-eight samples from patients with idiopathic, non-uveitis floaterectomy served as controls. Interleukin 6 (IL-6), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A) levels were correlated with the visual acuity (logMar), category of CRVO (ischemic or nonischemic) and morphologic parameters, such as central macular thickness-CMT, thickness of neurosensory retina-TNeuro, extent of serous retinal detachment-SRT and disintegrity of the IS/OS and others. Results: The mean IL-6 was 64.7pg/ml (SD ± 115.8), MCP-1 1015.7 ( ± 970.1), and VEGF-A 278.4 ( ± 512.8), which was significantly higher than the control IL-6 6.2 ± 3.4pg/ml (P=0.06), MCP-1 253.2 ± 73.5 (P<0.0000001) and VEGF-A 7.0 ± 4.9 (P<0.0006). All cytokines correlated highly with one another (correlation coefficient r=0.82 for IL-6 and MCP-1; r=0.68 for Il-6 and VEGF-A; r=0.64 for MCP-1 and VEGF-A). IL-6 correlated significantly with CMT, TRT, SRT, dIS/OS, and dELM. MCP-1 correlated significantly with SRT, dIS/OS, and dELM. VEGF-A correlated not with changes in SD-OCT, while it had a trend to be higher in the ischemic versus the nonischemic CRVO group (P=0.09). Conclusions: The inflammatory cytokines were more often correlated with morphologic changes assessed by SD-OCT, whereas VEGF-A did not correlate with CRVO-associated changes in SD-OCT. VEGF inhibition alone may not be sufficient in decreasing the inflammatory response in CRVO therapy

The Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonist Eltrombopag Inhibits Human Cytomegalovirus Replication Via Iron Chelation

The thrombopoietin receptor agonist eltrombopag was successfully used against human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)-associated thrombocytopenia refractory to immunomodulatory and antiviral drugs. These effects were ascribed to the effects of eltrombopag on megakaryocytes. Here, we tested whether eltrombopag may also exert direct antiviral effects. Therapeutic eltrombopag concentrations inhibited HCMV replication in human fibroblasts and adult mesenchymal stem cells infected with six different virus strains and drug-resistant clinical isolates. Eltrombopag also synergistically increased the anti-HCMV activity of the mainstay drug ganciclovir. Time-of-addition experiments suggested that eltrombopag interfered with HCMV replication after virus entry. Eltrombopag was effective in thrombopoietin receptor-negative cells, and the addition of Fe3+ prevented the anti-HCMV effects, indicating that it inhibits HCMV replication via iron chelation. This may be of particular interest for the treatment of cytopenias after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, as HCMV reactivation is a major reason for transplantation failure. Since therapeutic eltrombopag concentrations are effective against drug-resistant viruses, and synergistically increase the effects of ganciclovir, eltrombopag is also a drug-repurposing candidate for the treatment of therapy-refractory HCMV disease

Key Players of Cisplatin Resistance: Towards a Systems Pharmacology Approach

The major obstacle in the clinical use of the antitumor drug cisplatin is inherent and acquired resistance. Typically, cisplatin resistance is not restricted to a single mechanism demanding for a systems pharmacology approach to understand a whole cell’s reaction to the drug. In this study, the cellular transcriptome of untreated and cisplatin-treated A549 non-small cell lung cancer cells and their cisplatin-resistant sub-line A549rCDDP2000 was screened with a whole genome array for relevant gene candidates. By combining statistical methods with available gene annotations and without a previously defined hypothesis HRas, MAPK14 (p38), CCL2, DOK1 and PTK2B were identified as genes possibly relevant for cisplatin resistance. These and related genes were further validated on transcriptome (qRT-PCR) and proteome (Western blot) level to select candidates contributing to resistance. HRas, p38, CCL2, DOK1, PTK2B and JNK3 were integrated into a model of resistance-associated signalling alterations describing differential gene and protein expression between cisplatin-sensitive and -resistant cells in reaction to cisplatin exposure

Testing of the Survivin Suppressant YM155 in a Large Panel of Drug-Resistant Neuroblastoma Cell Lines

The survivin suppressant YM155 is a drug candidate for neuroblastoma. Here, we tested YM155 in 101 neuroblastoma cell lines (19 parental cell lines, 82 drug-adapted sublines). Seventy seven (77) cell lines displayed YM155 IC$_{50}$s in the range of clinical YM155 concentrations. ABCB1 was an important determinant of YM155 resistance. The activity of the ABCB1 inhibitor zosuquidar ranged from being similar to that of the structurally different ABCB1 inhibitor verapamil to being 65-fold higher. ABCB1 sequence variations may be responsible for this, suggesting that the design of variant-specific ABCB1 inhibitors may be possible. Further, we showed that ABCC1 confers YM155 resistance. Previously, p53 depletion had resulted in decreased YM155 sensitivity. However, $TP53$-mutant cells were not generally less sensitive to YM155 than $TP53$ wild-type cells in this study. Finally, YM155 cross-resistance profiles differed between cells adapted to drugs as similar as cisplatin and carboplatin. In conclusion, the large cell line panel was necessary to reveal an unanticipated complexity of the YM155 response in neuroblastoma cell lines with acquired drug resistance. Novel findings include that ABCC1 mediates YM155 resistance and that YM155 cross-resistance profiles differ between cell lines adapted to drugs as similar as cisplatin and carboplatin

YM155-Adapted Cancer Cell Lines Reveal Drug-Induced Heterogeneity and Enable the Identification of Biomarker Candidates for the Acquired Resistance Setting

Survivin is a drug target and its suppressant YM155 a drug candidate mainly investigated for high-risk neuroblastoma. Findings from one YM155-adapted subline of the neuroblastoma cell line UKF-NB-3 had suggested that increased ABCB1 (mediates YM155 efflux) levels, decreased SLC35F2 (mediates YM155 uptake) levels, decreased survivin levels, and TP53 mutations indicate YM155 resistance. Here, the investigation of 10 additional YM155-adapted UKF-NB-3 sublines only confirmed the roles of ABCB1 and SLC35F2. However, cellular ABCB1 and SLC35F2 levels did not indicate YM155 sensitivity in YM155-naïve cells, as indicated by drug response data derived from the Cancer Therapeutics Response Portal (CTRP) and the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) databases. Moreover, the resistant sublines were characterized by a remarkable heterogeneity. Only seven sublines developed on-target resistance as indicated by resistance to RNAi-mediated survivin depletion. The sublines also varied in their response to other anti-cancer drugs. In conclusion, cancer cell populations of limited intrinsic heterogeneity can develop various resistance phenotypes in response to treatment. Therefore, individualized therapies will require monitoring of cancer cell evolution in response to treatment. Moreover, biomarkers can indicate resistance formation in the acquired resistance setting, even when they are not predictive in the intrinsic resistance setting

Trifluridine for treatment of mpox infection in drug combinations in ophthalmic cell models

The Mpox virus can cause severe disease in the susceptible population with dermatologic and systemic manifestations. Furthermore, ophthalmic manifestations of mpox infection are well documented. Topical trifluridine (TFT) eye drops have been used for therapy of ophthalmic mpox infection in patients, however, its efficacy against mpox virus infection in this scenario has not been previously shown. In the present study, we have established ophthalmic cell models suitable for the infection with mpox virus. We show, that TFT is effective against a broad range of mpox isolates in conjunctival epithelial cells and keratocytes. Further, TFT remained effective against a tecovirimat-resistant virus strain. In the context of drug combinations, a nearly additive effect was observed for TFT combinations with brincidofovir and tecovirimat in conjunctival epithelial cells, while a slight antagonism was observed for both combinations in keratocytes. Altogether, our findings demonstrate TFT as a promising drug for treatment of ophthalmic mpox infection able to overcome tecovirimat resistance. However, conflicting results regarding the effect of drug combinations with approved compounds warrant close monitoring of such use in patients

Resistance to nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel is mediated by ABCB1 in urothelial cancer cells

Nanoparticle albumin?bound (nab)-paclitaxel appears to exhibit better response rates in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer of the bladder whom are pretreated with nab-paclitaxel compared with conventional paclitaxel. Paclitaxel may induce multidrug resistance in patients with cancer, while the mechanisms of resistance against paclitaxel are manifold. These include reduced function of pro?apoptotic proteins, mutations of tubulin and overexpression of the drug transporter adenosine 5'?triphosphate?binding cassette transporter subfamily B, member 1 (ABCB1). To evaluate the role of ABCB1 in nab?paclitaxel resistance in urothelial cancer cells, the bladder cancer cell lines T24 and TCC?SUP, as well as sub?lines with acquired resistance against gemcitabine (T24rGEMCI20 and TCC?SUPrGEMCI20) and vinblastine (T24rVBL20 and TCC?SUPrVBL20) were examined. For the functional inhibition of ABCB1, multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors with ABCB1?inhibiting properties, including cabozantinib and crizotinib, were used. Additional functional assessment was performed with cell lines stably transduced with a lentiviral vector encoding for ABCB1, and protein expression was determined by western blotting. It was indicated that cell lines overexpressing ABCB1 exhibited similar resistance profiles to nab?paclitaxel and paclitaxel. Cabozantinib and crizotinib sensitized tumor cells to nab?paclitaxel and paclitaxel in the same dose?dependent manner in cell lines overexpressing ABCB1, without altering the downstream signaling of tyrosine kinases. These results suggest that the overexpression of ABCB1 confers resistance to nab?paclitaxel in urothelial cancer cells. Additionally, small molecules may overcome resistance to anticancer drugs that are substrates of ABCB1