8 research outputs found

    Elastometry Indices of Unchanged Liver in Healthy Children

    Get PDF
    Two hundred healthy children aged 3–18Β years were included in the study to determine liver stiffness indices by means of shear wave elastometry. The difference is significant when we compared shear wave velocity in children aged 3–6Β years, on the one hand, and in children aged 7–18Β years, on the other (pΒ =Β 0.001). Liver stiffness indices in boys and girls were not different. As a result, liver stiffness indices in children in various age groups have been obtained, which can be recommended as normal ones for pediatric patients

    Shear Wave Elastography in the Assessment of Liver Changes in Children with Cystic Fibrosis

    No full text
    A standard ultrasound examination of the liver was performed in 232 children. It was supplemented by a two-dimensional shear wave elastography. There were 200 healthy children aged 3 to 18 years (control group) and 32 patients with cystic fibrosis aged 2 to 17 years (study group) among them. The procedure was carried out by means of Aixplorer device (Supersonic Imagine, France) using a convex sensor operating in the 1–6 MHz frequency range. Ten measurements of Young modulus values were carried out in different segments of the right lobe of the liver followed by data averaging. In patients with cystic fibrosis, the values of Young modulus were significantly higher than in healthy children (Emean median: 6.50 and 5.00 kPa, interquartile range: 5.62–7.52 and 4.70–5.38 kPa, respectively (p < 0.001). In patients with severe cystic fibrosis, the values of Young modulus were significantly higher compared to patients suffering from moderate disease (Emean median: 7.30 and 5.90 kPa, interquartile range: 6.20–10.70 and 5.20–6.75 kPa, respectively (p < 0.002). Shear wave elastography is a non-invasive technique that can be successfully used in a comprehensive ultrasound assessment of the liver in children with cystic fibrosis to facilitate the diagnosis and monitoring of fibrous changes

    ΠšΠžΠΠ‘Π’Π˜Π’Π£Π¦Π˜ΠžΠΠΠ›Π¬ΠΠ«Π• Π ΠΠ—Π›Π˜Π§Π˜Π― Π–Π•ΠΠ©Π˜Π ΠŸΠžΠ–Π˜Π›ΠžΠ“Πž Π’ΠžΠ—Π ΠΠ‘Π’Π Π‘ Π’Π•Π Π’Π•Π›Π¬ΠΠ«ΠœΠ˜ ΠŸΠ•Π Π•Π›ΠžΠœΠΠœΠ˜ И Π‘ ΠŸΠ•Π Π•Π›ΠžΠœΠΠœΠ˜ Π¨Π•Π™ΠšΠ˜ Π‘Π•Π”Π Π•ΠΠΠžΠ™ КОБВИ

    No full text
    This study revealed a marked constitutional differences among elderly women with trochanteric fractures and fractures of the femoral neck:– by classification of V.N. Shevkunenko – women with fractures of the femoral neck predominant proportion of dolihomorf type people and reduced the proportion of people with brachymorphic body type compared to women with trochanteric fractures.– by classification of V.M. Chernorutskii – women with trochanteric fractures predominant share of persons with hypersthenic body type and reduced the proportion of normostenik and astenik compared to women with femoral neck fracture.– by classification of L. Rees, H.J. Eisenk – endomorphs significantly more frequently diagnosed in women with trochanteric fractures, reduced the proportion of women normostenic and asthenic compared with the group with fractures of the femoral neck fractures.– by classification of V.P. Chtetsov – among women with fractures of the proximal femur not met subatletic and athletic somatotypes of megalosom constitution. It can be concluded that older women with these somatotypes have minimal risk of fractures of the proximal femur. Women with fractures of the femoral neck are predominantly stenoplastic somatype and in small amounts presented mezoplastic somatotype. Women with trochanteric fractures uniformly presented by mezoplastic, piknic and euriplastic somatotypes, considerably smaller proportion of people with stenoplastic somatotype.ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ исслСдованиС выявило Π²Ρ‹Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‚ΡƒΡ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Π΅ различия срСди ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ‰ΠΈΠ½Β ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ возраста с Π²Π΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ шСйки Π±Π΅Π΄Ρ€Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ кости:– ΠΏΠΎ классификации Π’.Н. Π¨Π΅Π²ΠΊΡƒΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΊΠΎ Ρƒ ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ‰ΠΈΠ½ с ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈΒ ΡˆΠ΅ΠΉΠΊΠΈ Π±Π΅Π΄Ρ€Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ кости ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°Π΄Π°Π΅Ρ‚ доля Π»ΠΈΡ† Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ…ΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ€Ρ„Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠ° ΠΈ сниТСна доля Π»ΠΈΡ† с Π±Ρ€Π°Ρ…ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡ€Ρ„Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠΌ тСлослоТСния ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡ€Π°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ с ТСнщинами с Π²Π΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ.– ΠΏΠΎ классификации Π’.М. Π§Π΅Ρ€Π½ΠΎΡ€ΡƒΡ†ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρƒ ТСнщин с Π²Π΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°Π΄Π°Π΅Ρ‚ доля Π»ΠΈΡ† с гипСрстСничСским Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠΌ тСлослоТСния и сниТСна доля нормостСников ΠΈ астСников ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡ€Π°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ с ТСнщинами с ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ шСйки Π±Π΅Π΄Ρ€Π°.– ΠΏΠΎ классификации L. Rees, H.J. Eisenk пикничСский Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏ тСлослоТСния Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΠΎ Ρ‡Π°Ρ‰Π΅ выявляСтся Ρƒ ТСнщин с Π²Π΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ, сниТСна доля нормостСничСских ΠΈ астСничСских ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ‰ΠΈΠ½ в сравнСнии с Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΠΎΠΉ с ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ шСйки Π±Π΅Π΄Ρ€Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ кости.– ΠΏΠΎ классификации В.П. Π§Ρ‚Π΅Ρ†ΠΎΠ²Π° Ρƒ ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ‰ΠΈΠ½ с ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡ‚Π΄Π΅Π»Π° бСдрСнной кости Π½Π΅ Π²ΡΡ‚Ρ€Π΅Ρ‡Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡŒ субатлСтичСский ΠΈ атлСтичСский соматотипы мСгалосомной конституции. ΠœΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΒ ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ Π²Ρ‹Π²ΠΎΠ΄, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ»Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ‰ΠΈΠ½Ρ‹ Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… соматотипов ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡŽΡ‚ ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΉ риск пСрСломов ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡ‚Π΄Π΅Π»Π° Π±Π΅Π΄Ρ€Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ кости ΠΈ ΠΈΡ… ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ Π½Π΅ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΒ Π² Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΡƒ риска. Π–Π΅Π½Ρ‰ΠΈΠ½Ρ‹ с ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ шСйки Π±Π΅Π΄Ρ€Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ кости ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΈΠΌΡƒΡ‰Π΅ΡΡ‚Π²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΒ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡŽΡ‚ стСнопластичСский соматотип ΠΈ Π² Π½Π΅Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΌ количСствС прСдставлСны Π»ΠΈΡ†Π° мСзопластичСского соматотипа. Π–Π΅Π½Ρ‰ΠΈΠ½Ρ‹ с Π²Π΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ прСдставлСны Ρ€Π°Π²Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π½ΠΎ мСзопластичСским, пикничСским и эурипластичСским соматотипами ΠΈ Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ мСньшая доля Π»ΠΈΡ† со стСнопластичСским соматотипом

    COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF ANTHROPOMETRIC DATA OF OLDER WOMEN WITH HIP NECK FRACTURE AND WITH TROCHANTERIC FRACTURES

    No full text
    Π’ ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΠ΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ‹ Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ ΡΡ€Π°Π²Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° антропомСтричСских Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… 250 ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ‰ΠΈΠ½ ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ возраста (56-74 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π°) с ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡ‚Π΄Π΅Π»Π° Π±Π΅Π΄Ρ€Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ кости Π² остром ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π΅ Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π²ΠΌΡ‹ – 122 Π»ΠΈΡ† с ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ шСйки Π±Π΅Π΄Ρ€Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ кости ΠΈ 128 с Π²Π΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ.ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ исслСдованиС выявило Π²Ρ‹Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ различия ΠΏΠΎ антропомСтричСским ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΌ Ρƒ ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ‰ΠΈΠ½ ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ возраста с низкоэнСргСтичСскими ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ шСйки Π±Π΅Π΄Ρ€Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ кости ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡ€Π°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ с показатСлями Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Π»ΠΈΡ† с Π²Π΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ.Π­Ρ‚ΠΈ ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ‰ΠΈΠ½Ρ‹ статистичСски Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΠΎ ΠΎΡ‚Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡŒ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ массой ΠΈ индСксом массы Ρ‚Π΅Π»Π°, мСньшими – всСми ΠΆΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ складками, ΠΎΠ±Ρ…Π²Π°Ρ‚Π°ΠΌΠΈ конСчностСй, Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ Ρ‚Π°Π·Π°, Π°Π±ΡΠΎΠ»ΡŽΡ‚Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ, ΠΌΡ‹ΡˆΠ΅Ρ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ большСй ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ костной массой. Π­Ρ‚ΠΈ Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡƒΡ‚ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΡΡ для стратификации риска развития низкоэнСргСтичСских ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡ‚Π΄Π΅Π»Π° Π±Π΅Π΄Ρ€Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ кости, формирования Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏ для Ρ€Π°Π½Π½Π΅ΠΉ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΈ этой ΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚ΠΊΠΈ анатомичСски обоснованного ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΊ Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ.The results of the comparative analysis of anthropometric data of 250 elderly women (56-74 years) withΒ fractures of the proximal femur in acute injuries – 122 people with fractures of the femoral neck and 128 with trochanteric fractures.The study found marked differences in anthropometric parameters in elderly women with low-energy fractures of the femoral neck compared with similar people with trochanteric fractures. These women differed significantly lower weight and body mass index, smaller – all the folds of fat, a girth limb, chest and pelvis, the absolute and relative fat, muscle mass and greater relative bone mass. These data can be used to stratify the risk of low-energy fractures of the proximal femur, forming groups to early prevention of disease and the development of an anatomically-based approach to treatmen
    corecore