8 research outputs found
Elastometry Indices of Unchanged Liver in Healthy Children
Two hundred healthy children aged 3β18Β years were included in the study to determine liver stiffness indices by means of shear wave elastometry. The difference is significant when we compared shear wave velocity in children aged 3β6Β years, on the one hand, and in children aged 7β18Β years, on the other (pΒ =Β 0.001). Liver stiffness indices in boys and girls were not different. As a result, liver stiffness indices in children in various age groups have been obtained, which can be recommended as normal ones for pediatric patients
Shear Wave Elastography in the Assessment of Liver Changes in Children with Cystic Fibrosis
A standard ultrasound examination of the liver was performed in 232 children. It was supplemented by a two-dimensional shear wave elastography. There were 200 healthy children aged 3 to 18 years (control group) and 32 patients with cystic fibrosis aged 2 to 17 years (study group) among them. The procedure was carried out by means of Aixplorer device (Supersonic Imagine, France) using a convex sensor operating in the 1β6 MHz frequency range. Ten measurements of Young modulus values were carried out in different segments of the right lobe of the liver followed by data averaging. In patients with cystic fibrosis, the values of Young modulus were significantly higher than in healthy children (Emean median: 6.50 and 5.00 kPa, interquartile range: 5.62β7.52 and 4.70β5.38 kPa, respectively (p < 0.001). In patients with severe cystic fibrosis, the values of Young modulus were significantly higher compared to patients suffering from moderate disease (Emean median: 7.30 and 5.90 kPa, interquartile range: 6.20β10.70 and 5.20β6.75 kPa, respectively (p < 0.002). Shear wave elastography is a non-invasive technique that can be successfully used in a comprehensive ultrasound assessment of the liver in children with cystic fibrosis to facilitate the diagnosis and monitoring of fibrous changes
ΠΠΠΠ‘Π’ΠΠ’Π£Π¦ΠΠΠΠΠΠ¬ΠΠ«Π Π ΠΠΠΠΠ§ΠΠ― ΠΠΠΠ©ΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠ ΠΠ‘Π’Π Π‘ ΠΠΠ Π’ΠΠΠ¬ΠΠ«ΠΠ ΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ Π Π‘ ΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ Π¨ΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠ‘Π’Π
This study revealed a marked constitutional differences among elderly women with trochanteric fractures and fractures of the femoral neck:β by classification of V.N. Shevkunenko β women with fractures of the femoral neck predominant proportion of dolihomorf type people and reduced the proportion of people with brachymorphic body type compared to women with trochanteric fractures.β by classification of V.M. Chernorutskii β women with trochanteric fractures predominant share of persons with hypersthenic body type and reduced the proportion of normostenik and astenik compared to women with femoral neck fracture.β by classification of L. Rees, H.J. Eisenk β endomorphs significantly more frequently diagnosed in women with trochanteric fractures, reduced the proportion of women normostenic and asthenic compared with the group with fractures of the femoral neck fractures.β by classification of V.P. Chtetsov β among women with fractures of the proximal femur not met subatletic and athletic somatotypes of megalosom constitution. It can be concluded that older women with these somatotypes have minimal risk of fractures of the proximal femur. Women with fractures of the femoral neck are predominantly stenoplastic somatype and in small amounts presented mezoplastic somatotype. Women with trochanteric fractures uniformly presented by mezoplastic, piknic and euriplastic somatotypes, considerably smaller proportion of people with stenoplastic somatotype.ΠΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ»ΠΎ Π²ΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈ ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½Β ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ° Ρ Π²Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΉΠΊΠΈ Π±Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈ:β ΠΏΠΎ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π.Π. Π¨Π΅Π²ΠΊΡΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΊΠΎ Ρ ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½ Ρ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈΒ ΡΠ΅ΠΉΠΊΠΈ Π±Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°Π΄Π°Π΅Ρ Π΄ΠΎΠ»Ρ Π»ΠΈΡ Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΈΠΏΠ° ΠΈ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½Π°Β Π΄ΠΎΠ»Ρ Π»ΠΈΡ Ρ Π±ΡΠ°Ρ
ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΒ Ρ Π²Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ.β ΠΏΠΎ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π.Π. Π§Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½Β Ρ Π²Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°Π΄Π°Π΅Ρ Π΄ΠΎΠ»Ρ Π»ΠΈΡ Ρ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΒ ΠΈ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½Π° Π΄ΠΎΠ»Ρ Π½ΠΎΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΈ Π°ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΒ Ρ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΉΠΊΠΈ Π±Π΅Π΄ΡΠ°.β ΠΏΠΎ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ L. Rees, H.J. Eisenk ΠΏΠΈΠΊΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΠΈΠΏ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎ ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Ρ ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½Β Ρ Π²Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ, ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½Π° Π΄ΠΎΠ»Ρ Π½ΠΎΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈ Π°ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½ Π²Β ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Ρ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠΎΠΉ Ρ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΉΠΊΠΈ Π±Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈ.β ΠΏΠΎ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈΒ Π.Π. Π§ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ²Π° Ρ ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½ Ρ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π° Π±Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉΒ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½Π΅ Π²ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΡ ΡΡΠ±Π°ΡΠ»Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ Π°ΡΠ»Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΏΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π³Π°Π»ΠΎΡΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΒ ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π°ΡΡ Π²ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ»ΡΠ΅ ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½Ρ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΒ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π° Π±Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ Π½Π΅ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΒ Π² Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ°. ΠΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½Ρ Ρ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΉΠΊΠΈ Π±Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΈΠΌΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΒ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΏ ΠΈ Π² Π½Π΅Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ Π»ΠΈΡΠ° ΠΌΠ΅Π·ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎΒ ΡΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΏΠ°. ΠΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½Ρ Ρ Π²Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Π·ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ, ΠΏΠΈΠΊΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΈΒ ΡΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΏΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°Ρ Π΄ΠΎΠ»Ρ Π»ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎ ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠΌ
COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF ANTHROPOMETRIC DATA OF OLDER WOMEN WITH HIP NECK FRACTURE AND WITH TROCHANTERIC FRACTURES
Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° Π°Π½ΡΡΠΎΠΏΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
250 ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½ ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ° (56-74 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π°) Ρ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π° Π±Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π² ΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π΅ ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΌΡ β 122 Π»ΠΈΡ Ρ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΉΠΊΠΈ Π±Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ 128 Ρ Π²Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ.ΠΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ»ΠΎ Π²ΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎ Π°Π½ΡΡΠΎΠΏΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΠΌ Ρ ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½ ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ° Ρ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΎΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΉΠΊΠΈ Π±Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΌΠΈ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π»ΠΈΡ Ρ Π²Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ.ΠΡΠΈ ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½Ρ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΡ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π»Π°, ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠΈΠΌΠΈ β Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈ ΠΆΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄ΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ, ΠΎΠ±Ρ
Π²Π°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ, Π³ΡΡΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π°, Π°Π±ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ, ΠΌΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΎΠΉ. ΠΡΠΈ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ° ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΎΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π° Π±Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ°Π½Π½Π΅ΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ Π°Π½Π°ΡΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΊ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ.The results of the comparative analysis of anthropometric data of 250 elderly women (56-74 years) withΒ fractures of the proximal femur in acute injuries β 122 people with fractures of the femoral neck and 128 with trochanteric fractures.The study found marked differences in anthropometric parameters in elderly women with low-energy fractures of the femoral neck compared with similar people with trochanteric fractures. These women differed significantly lower weight and body mass index, smaller β all the folds of fat, a girth limb, chest and pelvis, the absolute and relative fat, muscle mass and greater relative bone mass. These data can be used to stratify the risk of low-energy fractures of the proximal femur, forming groups to early prevention of disease and the development of an anatomically-based approach to treatmen